BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Procházka David (University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic)
Tytuł
The Unintended Consequences of Accounting Harmonization in a Transition Country : a Case Study of Management Accounting of Private Czech Companies
Źródło
Contemporary Economics, 2017, vol. 11, nr 4, s. 443-457, tab., bibliogr. 49 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Międzynarodowe Standardy Sprawozdawczości Finansowej (MSSF), Proces dostosowania, Przedsiębiorstwo prywatne, Rachunkowość
International Financial Reporting Standard, Adjustment process, Private enterprise, Accounting
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: M41
summ.
The paper is supported by the Czech Science Foundation under the research project "Economic Impacts of the IFRS Adoption in Selected Transition Countries" (No. 15-01280S); the support is gratefully acknowledged.
Kraj/Region
Republika Czeska
Czech Republic
Abstrakt
The paper addresses the impact of adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards on the mutual relations between financial and management accounting of private Czech companies under foreign control. Being acquired by a parent company, a subsidiary loses its independence and faces institutional duality, as it must respond to the parent's directives and is simultaneously confronted with local pressures. Using data from a survey, the logistic regression model provides evidence that subsidiaries under foreign control steadily integrate IFRS-based principles into their management accounting subsystems. The study extends current research on the integration of management and financial accounting by identifying a special case from a transition country where management accounting of subsidiaries converges with financial accounting of parents. A radical change in the traditional organization of management accounting is the strategic response of subsidiaries to the constraints of the local regulatory framework for financial reporting and taxation. However, aligning subsidiary practices with the parent's goals is conditioned by the existence of a functioning compensation scheme of the subsidiary's management with reference to IFRS-based results. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Albu C.N., Albu N., & Alexander D. (2014). When Global Accounting Standards Meet the Local Context: Insights from an Emerging Economy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(6), 489-510.
  2. Albu N., & Albu C.N. (2014). IFRS Application in Central and South-Eastern European Countries. Accounting & Management Information Systems, 13(2), 182-197.
  3. Albu N., Lupu I., & Sandu R. (2014). Multinationals as Vectors of Corporate Governance Improvement in Emerging Economies in Eastern Europe: A Case Study. In: S. Boubaker & D.K. Nguyen (Eds.), Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets (pp. 331-349). Berlin: Springer.
  4. Alon A. (2013). Complexity and Dual Institutionality: The Case of IFRS Adoption in Russia. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(1), 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00927.x
  5. Angelkort H., Sandt J., & Weißenberger B.E. (2008). Controllership under IFRS: Some Critical Observations from a German-speaking Country (Working Paper No. 1). Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen. Retrieved from http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2008/5397/pdf/ApapIMC_2008_01.pdf
  6. Birkinshaw J., & Hood N. (1998). Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 773-795. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.1255638
  7. Brüggemann U., Hitz J.-M., & Sellhorn T. (2013). Intended and Unintended Consequences of Mandatory IFRS Adoption: A Review of Extant Evidence and Suggestions for Future Research. European Accounting Review, 22(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2012.718487
  8. Colwyn Jones T., & Luther R. (2005). Anticipating the Impact of IFRS on the Management of German Manufacturing Companies: Some Observations from a British Perspective. Accounting in Europe, 2(1), 165-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180500379160
  9. Daske H., Hail L., Leuz C., & Verdi R. (2013). Adopting a Label: Heterogeneity in the Economic Consequences around IAS/IFRS Adoptions. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(3), 495-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12005
  10. Delios A., & Beamish P.W. (2001). Survival and Profitability: The Roles of Experience and Intangible Assets in Foreign Subsidiary Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1028-1038. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069446
  11. Ernest J. (2014). Český průmysl je "náš" jen z poloviny [Only Half of the Czech Industry Is "Ours"]. Statistika&My [Statistics&We], 4(10), 18-19.
  12. Fang Y., Jiang G.-L.F., Makino S., & Beamish P.W. (2010). Multinational Firm Knowledge, Use of Expatriates, and Foreign Subsidiary Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1), 27-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00850.x
  13. Fang Y., Wade M., Delios A., & Beamish P.W. (2007). International Diversification, Subsidiary Performance, and the Mobility of Knowledge Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 1053-1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.619
  14. Fey C.F., & Björkman I. (2001). The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on MNC Subsidiary Performance in Russia. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490938
  15. Firth D. (1993). Bias Reduction of Maximum Likelihood Estimates. Biometrika, 80(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/80.1.27
  16. Gaur A.S., Delios A., & Singh K. (2007). Institutional Environments, Staffing Strategies, and Subsidiary Performance. Journal of Management, 33(4), 611-636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307302551
  17. Gooderham P., Fenton-OCreevy M., Croucher R., & Brookes M. (2015). A Multilevel Analysis of the Use of Individual Pay-for-Performance Systems. Journal of Management, Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315610634
  18. Granlund M., & Lukka K. (1998). It's a Small World of Management Accounting Practices. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10(1), 153-179.
  19. Guerreiro M.S., Rodrigues L.L., & Craig R. (2012). Voluntary Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards by Large Unlisted Companies in Portugal - Institutional Logics and Strategic Responses. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(7), 482-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.05.003
  20. Harris M., & Raviv A. (1979). Optimal Incentive Contracts with Imperfect Information. Journal of Economic Theory, 20(2), 231-259.
  21. Heinze G. (2006). A Comparative Investigation of Methods for Logistic Regression with Separated or Nearly Separated Data. Statistics in Medicine, 25(24), 4216-4226. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2687
  22. Heinze G., & Ploner M. (2004). A SAS Macro, SPLUS Library and R Package to Perform Logistic Regression without Convergence Problems. Medical University of Vienna, Vienna. Retrieved from http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/user/georg.heinze/techreps/tr2_2004.pdf
  23. Hemmer T., & Labro E. (2008). On the Optimal Relation between the Properties of Managerial and Financial Reporting Systems. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1209-1240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00303.x
  24. Holmstrom B., & Milgrom P. (1991). Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 7, 24-52.
  25. Holmstrom B., & Milgrom P. (1994). The Firm as an Incentive System. The American Economic Review, 84(4), 972-991.
  26. Ittner C.D., & Larcker D.F. (2001). Assessing Empirical Research in Managerial Accounting: A Value-Based Management Perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 349-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00026-X
  27. Kaplan R.S. (1984). The Evolution of Management Accounting. The Accounting Review, 59(3), 390-418.
  28. Kosmidis I., & Firth D. (2009). Bias Reduction in Exponential Family Nonlinear Models. Biometrika, 96(4), 793-804. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asp055
  29. Kostova T., & Roth K. (2002). Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069293
  30. Král B. (2006). Manažerské účetnictví: vývoj ve světle změn podnikatelského prostředí a manažerských potřeb [Managerial Accounting: Developments in the light of changes in the business environment and managerial needs]. Politická ekonomie [Political Economy], 54(1), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.549
  31. Lantto A.-M., & Sahlström P. (2009). Impact of International Financial Reporting Standard Adoption on Key Financial Ratios. Accounting & Finance, 49(2), 341-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2008.00283.x
  32. Luo Y. (2003). Market-seeking MNEs in an Emerging Market: How Parent Subsidiary Links Shape Overseas Success. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(3), 290-309. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400027
  33. Matonti G., & Iuliano G. (2012). Voluntary Adoption of IFRS by Italian Private Firms: A Study of the Determinants. Eurasian Business Review, 2(2), 43-70. https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353812
  34. Mejzlík L. (2006). Možnosti a rizika technologického řešení převodu českých účetních závěrek do IFRS [Possibilities and risks of the technological solution of the transfer of Czech financial statements into IFRS]. Český finanční a účetní časopis [Czech Financial and Accounting Magazine], 1(1), 84-98.
  35. Nobes C. (2010). On Researching into the Use of IFRS by Private Entities in Europe. Accounting in Europe, 7(2), 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2010.511889
  36. Oliver C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1991.4279002
  37. Ozkan N., Singer Z., & You H. (2012). Mandatory IFRS Adoption and the Contractual Usefulness of Accounting Information in Executive Compensation: IFRS and Contractual Usefulness of Accounting Information. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(4), 1077-1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00453.x
  38. Popesko B., Novák P., Papadaki Š., & Hrabec D. (2015). Are the Traditional Budgets Still Prevalent: The Survey of the Czech Firms Budgeting Practices. Transformation in Business & Economics, 14(3C), 373-388.
  39. Procházka D. (2011). Benefits and Costs of Preparing IFRS Statements by Non-Listed Companies: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Proceedings of the International Conference Accounting and Management Information Systems, 6(1), 211-228.
  40. Procházka D. (2014). Implementace IFRS a její vliv na vzájemné postavení finančního a manažerského účetnictví. Český finanční a účetní časopis, 9(1), 50-60.
  41. Procházka D. (2016). Vynucené přijetí IFRS českými nekótovanými podniky: hodnocení přínosů a nákladů [Forced adoption of IFRS by Czech non-listed enterprises: benefit and cost evaluation]. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 2016(2), 46-62. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aop.528
  42. Procházka D. (2017). The Specifics of Forced IFRS Adoption by Czech Private Companies: A pilot field study. European Financial Systems 2017, 199-206.
  43. PwC. (2013). Kapesní průvodce IFRS a rozdíly proti českému účetnictví 2012 [IFRS Pocket Guide and Differences against Czech Accounting 2012]. Praha: PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit. Retrieved from http://www.pwc.com/cz/cs/ucetnictvi/ifrs-publikace/ifrs-pocket-guide-cz-gaap-rozdily-2013.pdf
  44. Roth K., & O'Donnell S. (1996). Foreign Subsidiary Compensation Strategy: An Agency Theory Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 678-703. https://doi.org/10.2307/256659
  45. Taipaleenmäki J., & Ikäheimo S. (2013). On the Convergence of Management Accounting and Financial Accounting - The Role of Information Technology in Accounting Change. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 14(4), 321-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2013.09.003
  46. Weißenberger B.E., & Angelkort H. (2011). Integration of Financial and Management Accounting Systems: The Mediating Influence of a Consistent Financial Language on Controllership Effectiveness. Management Accounting Research, 22(3), 160-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2011.03.003
  47. Wu J.S., & Zhang I.X. (2009). The Voluntary Adoption of Internationally Recognized Accounting Standards and Firm Internal Performance Evaluation. The Accounting Review, 84(4), 1281-1309. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.4.1281
  48. Yang Q., Mudambi R., & Meyer K.E. (2008). Conventional and Reverse Knowledge Flows in Multinational Corporations. Journal of Management, 34(5), 882-902. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321546
  49. Yazdifar H., Zaman M., Tsamenyi M., & Askarany D. (2008). Management Accounting Change in a Subsidiary Organisation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(3), 404-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2006.08.004
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2300-8814
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.255
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu