BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Kuźnar Andżelika (Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie), Menkes Jerzy (Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie)
Tytuł
Brexit From Different Perspectives
Brexit z różnych perspektyw
Źródło
Unia Europejska.pl, 2017, nr 6 (247), s. 31-41, rys., bibliogr. 42 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Integracja gospodarcza i polityczna Europy, Geoekonomia, Brexit
Economic and political integration of Europe, Geoeconomic, Brexit
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: F15, F50
streszcz., summ.
Abstrakt
Przedmiotem badania są konsekwencje Brexitu postrzegane z perspektywy Unii Europejskiej, Wielkiej Brytanii i Polski. Opracowanie ma charakter interdyscyplinarnego studium z zakresu ekonomicznej analizy prawa. W konkluzji stwierdzamy, że bilans dla UE jest ujemny. Wyjście Wielkiej Brytanii z UE zmienia wewnętrzną i zewnętrzną percepcję i atrakcyjność integracji, która nie będzie już postrzegana jako droga bez powrotu, co może skutkować kolejnymi wystąpieniami. Osłabia tożsamość europejską. Również ujemne będzie saldo dla Wielkiej Brytanii. Gospodarczych kosztów wyjścia z UE nie rekompensują ani oszczędności na wpłatach do budżetu UE, ani wątpliwe korzyści z wolnych od gorsetu prawa europejskiego stosunków gospodarczych z państwami trzecimi. Dla Polski Brexit jest wyłącznie niekorzystny. Polska potrzebuje silnej Unii Europejskiej, wspierającej jej podstawowe interesy, w realizacji których Wielka Brytania jest strategicznym partnerem. Wystąpienie Wielkiej Brytanii z UE oznacza także mniejsze wpłaty do budżetu UE, a co za tym idzie - spadek korzyści finansowych dla Polski.(abstrakt oryginalny)

The subject of the research is consequences of Brexit perceived from the perspective of the European Union, the United Kingdom and Poland. The research is an interdisciplinary law and economics study. The results show that the balance for the EU is negative. Brexit changes the internal and external perception and attractiveness of integration, which will no longer be perceived as a road with no return, which may result in subsequent withdrawals. It weakens the European identity. It closes the era of bargaining and concessions to the UK. The balance for the United Kingdom will also be negative. The economic costs of leaving the EU can neither be compensated by savings on EU budget payments nor by the dubious benefits stemming from the economic relations with third countries free of the European regulatory restrictions. At the same time, Brexit ends the era of controversy around EU membership and therefore forces the formulation of internal programmes and the implementation of a policy based on realities, not on nostalgia. For Poland, Brexit is also unfavourable. Poland needs a strong European Union to support its basic interests in which the UK is a strategic partner. UK's withdrawal means also lower EU budget and therefore decrease of financial benefits for Poland.(original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Alternatives to membership: possible models for the United Kingdom outside the European Union (2016). UK Government, March, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/504661/Alternatives_to_membership_possible_models_for_the_UK_outside_the_EU_Accessible.pdf [access: 10.03.2017].
  2. Ashworth-Hayes S. (2016). Norwegians pay about as much as Brits to access EU. https://infacts.org/norwegians-pay-same-brits-eu-access/ ([access: 10.05.2017].
  3. Babin J. (25.10.2016). Brexit: l'Australie refroidit le Royaume-Uni. Les Echos. https://www.lesechos.fr/monde/enjeux-internationaux/ 0211429623702-accord-de-libre-echange-laustralie-met-le-hola-au-royaume-uni-2037801.php [access: 10.03.2017].
  4. Baldwin R.E. (ed.) (2016). Brexit Beckons: Thinking ahead by leading economists. CEPR Press, London.
  5. Barnier M. (2016). Introductory comments by Michel Barnier. Press briefing. https://ec.europa.eu/info/news/introductory-comments- michel-barnier_en [access: 10.03.2017].
  6. BBC News (2016). Five models for post-Brexit UK trade. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36639261 [access: 5.03.2017].
  7. Campos N. F., Coricelli F., Moretti L. (2014). Economic Growth and Political Integration: Synthetic Counterfactuals Evidence from Europe, "Discussion Paper Series", IZA DP No. 8162.
  8. Campos N. F., Coricelli F. (eds.). (2017). The Economics of UK-EU Relations. From the Treaty of Rome to the Vote for Brexit, Palgrave.
  9. Crisp J., Tampest M. (2016). EU Brexit boss sets October 2018 deadline for UK divorce talks. http://www.euractiv.com/section/ uk-europe/news/eu-brexit-boss-sets-october-2018-deadline-for-end-of-uk-divorce-talks/ [10.03.2017].
  10. Dixon H. (2017). The EU budget. https://infacts.org/briefings/ eu-budget/ [access: 10.05.2017].
  11. Draft Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community highlighting the progress made in the negotiation round with the UK of 16-19 March 2018, 19 March 2018, TF50(2018) 35.
  12. EC Guidelines (2017). European Council (Art. 50) meeting (15 December 2017) - Guidelines, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/32236/15-euco-art50-guidelines-en.pdf [access: 16.12.2017].
  13. EU referendum: UK's EU reform negotiations and the Tusk package (2016). http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/ Summary/CBP-7497 [access: 12.02.2017].
  14. FCA letter (2016). Letter from Financial Conduct Authority to Committee Chair regarding passports, 17 August. Retrieved from http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/treasury/Correspondence/AJB-to-Andrew-Tyrie-Passporting.PDF [access: 20.03.2018].
  15. Giles Ch. (2017), What has the EU done for the UK? Financial Times, 31 March, https://www.ft.com/content/202a60c0-cfd8-11e5-831d- 09f7778e7377 [access: 10.02.2018].
  16. Goodwin M. J., Heath O. (2016). The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind: An Aggregate-level Analysis of the Result. "The Political Quarterly". 87(3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12285.
  17. Hansard's Parliamentary Debates, 3rd series, Vol. 97, col. 122.
  18. Herszenhorn D.M. (2018). Eastern countries commit to bigger EU budget after Brexit, Politico, 2 February, https://www.politico.eu/ article/gunther-oettinger-eastern-countries-commit-to-bigger-eu-budget-after-brexit/ [4.04.2018].
  19. HM Treasury (Feb 2017). European Union Finances 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/european-union-finances-2016 [access: 10.05.2017].
  20. Honley J. (2017). Can the UK adopt the "Norway model" as its Brexit solution? "The Guardian". https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/dec/01/can-the-uk-adopt-the-norway-model-as-its-brexit-solution [access: 10.03.2017].
  21. https://www.rand.org/about/glance.html [access: 10.12.2017].
  22. https://www.rand.org/randeurope/research/projects/brexit- economic-implications/calculator.html#notes-on-differences-in-data-b- , [access: 10.12.2017].
  23. Full Fact (2017), https://fullfact.org/europe/uk-eu-trade/ [access: 15.02.2018].
  24. Hughes L. (2017). What is the Great Repeal Bill? The only explanation you need to read. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/great-repeal-bill-explanation-need-read/, [access: 15.07.2017].
  25. Institute for Government (2017). The EU Divorce Bill, https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/ eu-divorce-bill, [access: 4.04.2018]).
  26. Jensen M. D., Snaith H. (2016). When politics prevails: the political economy of a Brexit. "Journal of European Public Policy". 23(9). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1174531
  27. Joint Report from the Negotiators of the European Union and the United Kingdom Government on progress during Phase 1 of Negotiations under Article 50 TEU on the United Kingdom's orderly withdrawal from the European Union, (2017, 8 December), https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/665869/Joint_report_on_progress_during_phase_1_of_negotiations_under_Article_50_TEU_on_the_United_Kingdom_s_orderly_withdrawal_from_the_European_Union.pdf [access: [access: 10.12.2017].
  28. Khan M. (2018). Juncker calls for EU budget boost after Brexit, Financial Times, 8 January, https://www.ft.com/content/49ab12f9- ff13-3745-ba33-7c7102591f31 [access:4.04.2018].
  29. Kuźnar A. (2017). Międzynarodowy handel produktami wiedzy. Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH. Warszawa.
  30. Media Mole (2017). Watch: The evidence Nigel Farage said money sent to the EU should go to the NHS, http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2016/06/watch-evidence-nigel-farage-said-money-sent-eu-should-go-nhs [access: 1.03.2017].
  31. Menkes J., Wasilkowski A. (2017). Organizacje międzynarodowe. Prawo instytucjonalne. PWN, Warszawa.
  32. Menon A., Fowler B. (2016). Hard or Soft? The Politics of Brexit. "National Institute Economic Review". 238(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002795011623800110
  33. Modzelewski K. (2017). Dojdzie do głosu gen konformizmu, https://wiadomo.co/prof-karol-modzelewski-dojdzie-do-glosu-gen-konformizmu/ [access: 10.12.2017]
  34. Morris Ch. (2017). Brexit: Does the UK owe the EU money?, BBC News, 17 October.
  35. Powell J. M., Thyne C. L. (2011). Global instances of coups from 1950 to 2010: A new data set, "Journal of Peace Research", No 48(2).
  36. Ries Ch., Hafner M., Smith T. D., Burwell F. G, Egel D., Han E., Stepanek M., Shatz H. J. (2017). After Brexit: Alternate forms of Brexit and their implications for the United Kingdom, the European Union and the United States, Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation, https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2200.html [access: 10.12.2017].
  37. The Conference Board Total Economy Database (2017). https://www.conference-board.org [access:10.02.2018].
  38. The Economist (2016). The Brexit delusion. 27 February, https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21693568-david-cameron-will-struggle-win-referendum-britains-eu-membership-if-he-loses [access:5.03.2017].
  39. The Royal Society (2015). UK research and the European Union. The role of the EU in funding UK research, https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/uk-research-and-european-union/role-of-EU-in-funding-UK-research/how-much-funding-does-uk-get-in-comparison-with-other-countries/ [access: (15.02.2018].
  40. Uberoi E. (2016). European Union Referendum 2016. "Commons Briefing Papers", CBP-7639. http://researchbriefings.files. parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7639/CBP-7639.pdf [access: 10.02.2017].
  41. UK Parliament (2017). Brexit and the EU budget, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201617/ldselect/ ldeucom/125/12511.htm
  42. UNDP (2016). Human Development Report, http://hdr.undp.org [access:11.01.2018].
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2084-2694
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu