- Autor
- Mačiulienė Monika (Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania), Skaržauskienė Aelita (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania), Botteldooren Dick (Ghent University, Belgium)
- Tytuł
- Developing a Digital Co-Creation Assessment Methodology
- Źródło
- Contemporary Economics, 2018, vol. 12, nr 4, s. 399-407, rys., bibliogr. 29 poz.
- Tytuł własny numeru
- Digital Transformations and Value Creation in International Markets
- Słowa kluczowe
- Przestrzeń publiczna, Innowacje społeczne
Public space, Social innovations - Uwagi
- Klasyfikacja JEL: Q55, L38, O35
summ.
The C3PLACES Project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 693443. - Abstrakt
- Digitally enhanced public open spaces are ideal environments for the social innovations to emerge due to the involvement of the entire community and ICT (Information and Communication Tools) in knowledge creation and aggregation. This research paper presents an early-stage methodological digital co-creation assessment framework that considers a variety of aspects to transform public open places into co-created spaces: socio-cultural contexts, multi-stakeholder perspective, diversity in needs, incentives for participation of different groups and cooperation capabilities. The framework incorporates these aspects and proposes a suitable community-wide co-creation model employing the creative, innovative and cooperative applications of ICT. The assessment methodology is developed using a pragmatic mixed-method research design where the theoretical framework summarizes current research progress on the topic and the expert interviews allow to condense the complex and multi-dimensional realities for decision-makers seeking social innovations in the public spaces. The methodological assessment framework presented in this paper strengthens the scientific evidence regarding the potential of co-creation in developing social innovations and provides a managerial framework for developing co-creative initiatives. (original abstract)
- Pełny tekst
- Pokaż
- Bibliografia
-
- Baldersheim, H., & Kersting, N. (2012). The wired city: A new face of power? A citizien perspective. In: J. Peter, K. Mossberger, S. E. Clarke (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban politics (pp. 590-606). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Bason, C. (2015). Leading public sector innovation: Cocreating for a better society. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press.
- Bobenberg, W. (2014). A Method of Assessing Public Space Attractiveness with Use of Google Maps. Case of Poznan MA. In: J. Charytonowicz (Ed.), Advances in Human Factors and Sustainable Infrastructure 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 119-127). Orlando, FL: Springer.
- Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209104824
- Bulc, V. (2012). New organizational and social paradigm: From cooperation to co-creation and sustainable coexistence. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, 9(1), 29-39. doi: 10.1386/jots.9.1.29_1.
- Certomà, C., Dyer, M., Pocatilu, L., & Rizzi, F. (Eds.). (2017). Citizen Empowerment and Innovation in the Data-Rich City. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
- Cheliotis, K. (2015). Capturing real-time public space activity using publicly available digital traces. (Technical Report No. 16-16). The Workshops of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c147/a4fcfeef9b5fb6e032bfd-895b35e442bfe3e.pdf
- Dabbish, L., Stuart, C., Tsay, J., & Herbsleb, J. (2012). Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. In: CSCW '12 Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1277-1286). New York, NY: ACM.
- De Lange, M., & De Waal, M. (2013). Owning the city: New media and citizen engagement in urban design. First Monday, 18(11), 1-14. http://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i11.4954
- Franz, Y. (2015). Designing social living labs in urban research. Info, 17(4), 53-66. http://doi.org/10.1108/info-01-2015-0008
- Griggs, K., & Wild, R. (2013). A Social Networking Adoption Model for Communication and Collaboration in e-Government (Vol. 1). In: W. Castelnovo, E. Ferrari (Eds.), Proceedings of 13th European Conference on eGovernment (pp. 221-229). Como: Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences. University of Insubria.
- Hoelscher, M., Mildenberger, G., & Bund, E. (2015). A Methodological Framework for Measuring Social Innovation. Historical Social Research, 40(3), 49-78. http://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.40.2015.3.48-78
- Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406
- Krippendorff, K. (2003). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Lester, F. (2005). On the conceptual and philosophical foundations of research in mathematics education. ZDM, 37(6), 457-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655854
- Luo, S., Xia, H., Yoshida, T., & Wang, Z. (2009). Toward Collective Intelligence of Online Communities: A Primitive Conceptual Model. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 18(2), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-009-5095-0
- Mačiulienė, M. (2018). Mapping Digital Co-Creation for Urban Communities and Public Places. Systems, 6(14), 1-11. http://doi.org/10.3390/systems6020014
- Martinus, K. (2014). Can Public Space be a Platform for Social Innovation? A Study of Sannomiya, Kobe, Japan. Japan Social Innovation Journal, 4(1), 44-54.
- Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: What is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4), 192-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732632
- Millard, J. (2013). ICT-enabled public sector innovation: Trends and prospects. In: ICEGOV '13 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 77-86). New York, NY: ACM.
- Mulder, I. (2012). Living Labbing the Rotterdam Way: Co-Creation as an Enabler for Urban Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2, 39-43.
- Mulder, I., & Stappers, P. J. (2009). Co-creating in Practice : Results and Challenges. In: Technology Management Conference (ICE), 2009 IEEE International (pp. 1-8). Leiden: IEEE.
- Nouri, A. S., & Costa, J. P. (2017). Placemaking and climate change adaptation: New qualitative and quantitative considerations for the Place Diagram. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Place Diagram, 10(3), 356-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2017.1295096
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Poplin, A. (2012). Playful public participation in urban planning: A case study for online serious games. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(3), 195-206. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.10.003
- Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Cocreating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, 32(3), 4-9. http://doi.org/10.1108/10878570410699249
- Project for Public Spaces. (2009). What Makes a Successful Place? Available at https://www.pps.org/reference/grplacefeat
- Skaržauskienė, A., Ewart, J., Krzywosz-Rynkiewicz, B., Zalewska, A., Leichteris, E., Mačiulis, A., ... Valys, T. (2015). Social technologies and collective intelligence. Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University.
- Stewart-Weeks, M. (2010). Social Innovation & The City: What is the Connection between Social Innovation and Urban Innovation ... and Why Does it Matter ? What is the connection between Social Innovation & Urban Innovation ... and Why Does it Matter? Social Spaces. Available at https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lien_research/49
- Cytowane przez
- ISSN
- 2084-0845
- Język
- eng
- URI / DOI
- http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.285






