BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Zalewski Janusz (Florida Gulf Coast University, USA), Gonzales Fernando (Florida Gulf Coast University, USA), Guo Dahai (Florida Gulf Coast University, USA), Kirche Elias (Florida Gulf Coast University, USA), Rodrigez Walter (Florida Gulf Coast University, USA)
Tytuł
Internet of things and its potential impact on business
Internet Rzeczy i jego potencjalny wpływ na biznes
Źródło
Rocznik Naukowy Wydziału Zarządzania w Ciechanowie, 2017, t. 11, nr 1-4, s. 147-166, rys., tab., bibliogr. 37 poz.
Research Yearbook Faculty of Management in Ciechanów
Słowa kluczowe
Modele biznesowe, Internet rzeczy, Chmura obliczeniowa, Bezpieczeństwo danych
Business models, Internet of Things (IoT), Cloud computing, Data security
Uwagi
streszcz., summ.
Abstrakt
W artykule przedstawiono powstawanie Internetu Rzeczy (IoT), jego główne właściwości, włącznie z rolą czujników i systemów łączności, połączenia z chmurą, jak również wpływ na powstawanie nowych modeli biznesowych. Omówiono również konfiguracje systemowe IoT, z przykładami rozwiązań technicznych i potencjalnymi korzyściami dla gospodarki. Ponadto, naszkicowano główne wyzwania i czynniki ryzyka wynikające z wprowadzenia tej technologii, włączając zagadnienia ochrony danych, prywatności i problemy prawne. Artykuł koncentruje się na omówieniu podstaw tej technologii i jedynie pobieżnie odnosi się do bardziej zaawansowanych problemów technicznych lub badawczych.(abstrakt oryginalny)

This paper discusses the emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT), its major technical characteristics, including sensors and device connectivity, merging with the cloud, as well as its impact on creating new business models. IoT's configurations are presented, with examples of basic technical solutions, and benefits for the economy are discussed. In addition, several challenges and risks involved with the introduction of this technology are outlined, such as security, privacy and legal issues. The paper's emphasis is on discussing the background of the technology, so the depth of discussing technical aspects and addressing the re- search issues is limited.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. IEEE Standards Association (2016) P2413 - Standard for an Architectural Frame- work for the Internet of Things (IoT). New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
  2. IEEE Standards Association (2014) IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Internet of Things (IoT) Ecosystem Study. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
  3. Rose K., Eldridge S., Chapin L. (2015) The Internet of Things: An Overview. Geneva, Switzerland: Internet Society.
  4. Voas J. (2016) Networks of Things. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Stand- ards and Technology.
  5. LaPlante A. (2016) Analyzing Data in the Internet of Things. Sebastopol, Calif.: O'Reilly.
  6. Kraemer B. (2016) P2413 - Standard for an Architectural Framework for the Internet of Things. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
  7. Doukas C. (2012) Building Internet of Things with Arduino. Athens, Greece: self- published.
  8. Norris D. (2015) Internet of Things: Do-It-Yourself at Home Projects for Arduino, Raspberry Pi and BeagleBone Black. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  9. Weaver J., Chin S. (2015) Raspberry Pi with Java: Programming the Internet of Things. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  10. Laney D. (2001) 3D Data Management: Controlling Data Volume, Velocity, and Vari- ety. Stamford, Conn.: META Group, Inc.
  11. Stonebraker M. (2010) SQL Databases vs. NoSQL Databases. "Communications of the ACM", 53 (4): 10-11.
  12. Mell P, Grance T. (2011) The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, Special Publica- tion 800-145, Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  13. Amazon Web Services (2016) URL: https://aws.amazon.com/
  14. Microsoft Azure (2016) URL: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/
  15. HIT Consultant (2015) AWS, Philips Strengthens Partnership to Unleash Digital Health IoT. URL: http://hitconsultant.net/2015/10/09/aws-philips-strengthens-digi- tal-health-iot/
  16. Amiot E. et al. (2015) The Internet of Things: Disrupting Traditional Business Mod- els. New York: Oliver Wyman Group.
  17. Barkai J. (2016) The Outcome Economy: How the Industrial Internet of Things Is Transforming Every Business. CreateSpace.
  18. Norton D. (2016) Digital Context 2.0: Seven Lessons in Business Strategy, Consumer Behavior, and the Internet of Things. Gifted Press.
  19. Wright K. (2015) What Key Disruptive Effects Have and Will the Internet of Things or Physical Computing Have on Business and Our Daily Lives? GRIN Verlag GmbH.
  20. Porter M.E., Heppelmann J.E. (2014) How smart, connected products are transform- ing competition. "Harvard Business Review", 92 (11): 64-88.
  21. Mishler C. (2015) The Future of the Internet of Things, "Strategic Finance", 96 (11): 62-63.
  22. Kindstrom D. (2010) Towards a service-based business model - Key aspects for future competitive advantage. "European Management Journal", 28 (6): 479-490.
  23. Fleisch E., Weinberger M., Wortmann F. (2014) Business Models and the Internet of Things. St. Gallen, Switzerland: Bosch Internet of Things & Services Lab.
  24. Gassmann O., Frankenberger K., Csik M. (2015) The Business Model Navigator: 55 Models That Will Revolutionise Your Business. Indianapolis, Ind.: FT Press.
  25. ABB Ltd (2016) Smart Grids - Highlights. Zurich, Switzerland. URL: http://new.abb. com/smartgrids
  26. Hayku (2016) SenseME Technology: The Brains Behind Haiku Home. Lexington, Kentucky, USA. URL: http:www.haikuhome.com/senseme
  27. O'Marah K. (2016) Beyond Supply Chain. SCM World, May 13.
  28. Ellis S., Morris H.D., Santagate J. (2015) loT-enabled analytic applications revolu- tionize supply chain planning and execution. IDC White Paper #259697. Framing- ham, Mass.: International Data Corporation.
  29. Iansiti M., Lakhani K.R. (2014) Digital Ubiąuity: How Connections, Sensors, and Data Are Revolutionizing Business (Digest Summary). "Harvard Business Review", 92 (11): 91-99.
  30. Ganzha M., Paprzycki M., et al. (2016) Semantic Technologies for the loT - An Inter- loT Perspective. Proc. IoTDI-2016, First IEEE Intern. Conf. on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation, Berlin, April 4-8, 2016, pp. 271-276.
  31. ABI Research (2014) The Internet of Robotic Things. Technology Analysis Report AN-1818. New York.
  32. Shein E. (2016) The Beginning of the Internet of Robot Things, ACM News, August 11.
  33. Gonzalez F.G. (2013) Real-Time Simulation and Control of Large Scale Distributed Discrete Event Systems, Proc. CSER'13, 2013 Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Atlanta, GA, March 19-22, 2013, pp. 177-186.
  34. Gonzalez F., Guo D., Nowicki A., Zalewski J. (2017) Senior Lab Projects for Teach- ing the Internet-of-Things in a Software Engineering Program. Proc. eTEE'201, 4th Intern. Conference on e-Technologies in Engineering Education, Gdańsk, Poland, April 27-28, 2017.
  35. Castro D., New J., McQuinn A. (2016) How is the Federal Government Using the Internet of Things? Washington, DC: Center for Data Innovation.
  36. Andrews C. et al. (2016) The Internet of Things: What the loT Means for the Public Sector. Washington, DC: GovLoop.
  37. SRI Consulting Business Intelligence (2008) Disruptive Civil Technologies. Six Technologies with Potential Impacts on US Interests out to 2025. Appendix F. The Internet of Things (Background). Washington, DC: National Intelligence Council.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1897-4716
Język
eng
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu