BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Kwarciński Tomasz (Cracow University of Economics, Poland), Ulman Paweł (Cracow University of Economics, Poland)
Tytuł
A Hybrid Version of Well-being : an Attempt at Operationalisation
Źródło
Zarządzanie Publiczne / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, 2018, nr 4 (46), s. 30-49, rys., tab., bibliogr. 22 poz.
Public Governance
Słowa kluczowe
Kwantyfikacja dobrobytu, Operacjonalizacja, Dobrobyt, Dobrobyt społeczny, Dobrostan
Quantification of prosperity, Operationalization, Prosperity, Social welfare, Well-being
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: I31, I39
summ.
Publication of this paper is financially supported by Narodowy Bank Polski under the economic education program, NBP-DEW-WPE-AB-066-0237-2017.
Abstrakt
Objectives: This paper aims to investigate the possibility of constructing a hybrid version of well-being and making an attempt at its operationalisation.
Research Design & Methods: The theoretical framework is based on the capability approach of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, while the empirical part of the paper refers to a fuzzy set theory.
Findings: We propose three measures of hybrid well-being, referring to (1) the minimum formula, (2) a mobility index, and (3) the concept of internalities.
Implications / Recommendations: We are convinced that it is not only possible to create a philosophically informed measure of well-being, but also that this kind of measure can be crucial in the context of public policy due to its sensitivity to autonomy and adaptation problems.
Contribution / Value Added: Findings of this research can be seen as an attempt to merge philosophical investigation with economics theories and applications. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka SGH im. Profesora Andrzeja Grodka
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Alexandrova, A. (2017). A Philosophy for the Science of Well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), 181-205.
  3. Betti, G. et al. (2006). On the construction of fuzzy measures for the analysis of poverty and social exclusion. Statistica & Applicazioni, 4(1), 77-97.
  4. Boelhouwer, J. & Noll, H. (2014). Objective quality of life. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht - Heidelberg - New York - London: Springer.
  5. Cerioli, A. & Zani, S. (1990). A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In C. Dagum (Ed.), Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty (pp. 272-284). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
  6. Cheli, B. (1995). Totally fuzzy and relative measures of poverty in dynamic context. Metron, LIII(3-4), 183-205.
  7. Cummins, R. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52(1), 55-72.
  8. Dolan, P. & Peasgood, T. (2008). Measuring well-being for public policy: Preferences or experiences? The Journal of Legal Studies, 37(S2), S5-S31.
  9. Kagan, S. (2009). Well-being as enjoying the good. Philosophical Perspectives, 23(1), 253-272.
  10. Kraut, R. (2007). What is Good, and Why. The Ethics of Well-Being. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  11. Kraut, R. (2013). Desire and the human good. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Ethical Theory: An Anthology (pp. 286-293). Wiley-Blackwell.
  12. Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2), 33-59.
  13. Panek, T. (2011). Ubóstwo, wykluczenie społeczne i nierówności. Teoria i praktyka pomiaru. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
  14. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press.
  15. Raj, Ch. (2015). Behavioral economics and public policy: A pragmatic perspective. American Economic Review, 105(5), 1-33.
  16. Seligman, M. (2011), Flourish. North Sydney, Australia: William Heinemann.
  17. Sen, A. (2005). Commodities and Capabilities. Delhi - New York: Oxford University Press.
  18. Tatarkiewicz, W. (1976). Analysis of Happiness. Warsaw: PWN.
  19. Tiberius, V. (2014). Well-being, philosophical theories of. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht - Heidelberg - New York - London: Springer.
  20. Ulman, P. & Soltes E. (2015). The monetary and nonmonetary aspects of poverty in Poland and Slovakia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 3(1), 61-73.
  21. Woodard, C. (2015). Hybrid theories. In G. Fletcher (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being (pp. 161-174). Abingdon: Routledge.
  22. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1898-3529
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/ZP.2018.46.4.03
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu