BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Głuc Krzysztof (Cracow University of Ekonomics, Poland)
Tytuł
The Neo-Weberian State Paradigm in the Water and Sewage Sector in Poland
Źródło
Zarządzanie Publiczne / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, 2018, nr 4 (46), s. 50-64, tab., bibliogr. 31 poz.
Public Governance
Słowa kluczowe
Nowe zarządzanie publiczne, Neoweberyzm, Paradygmaty zarządzania, Gospodarka wodno-ściekowa, Zarządzanie publiczne
New public management, Neo-Weberian state, Management paradigms, Water and wastewater management, Public governance
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: H400, H410
summ.
Abstrakt
Objectives: The main objective of this article is to investigate the current stage of the public management paradigm in the area of the water and sewage sector in Poland.
Research Design & Methods: A thorough examination of the current stage of research of the post-New Public Management concepts is followed by empirical analysis of public management paradigms present in the water and sewage sector in Poland. The research hypothesis focuses on a shift from the NPM model towards other paradigms closer to Neo-Weberian State or a hybrid. Analysis of statistical data is supported by additional arguments related to recent publications and legal changes in the sector.
Contribution/Value Added: This article is one of the first analyses of the applications of post-NPM paradigms in the water and sewage sector in Poland. A special emphasis is put on the discussion of NWS elements in the paradigm shift taking place in this sector.
Implications/Recommendations: The results of the research conducted prove that the NPM model is still in place in the water and sewage sector in Poland, but gradually, in particular as a result of recent changes to legislation and the introduction of more centralised procedures, the NPM model is being supplemented by new elements that are clearly of a NWS origin. While it is visible that these paradigms co-exist at this point, it is necessary to continue research and thorough observations of the sector to investigate the future development of public management in this area. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka SGH im. Profesora Andrzeja Grodka
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Białynicki-Birula, P., Ćwiklicki, M., Głowacki, J. & Klich, J. (2016). The conceptualisation of the Neo-Weberian state in the literature. In: S. Mazur (Ed.), The Neo-Weberian State. Towards a New Paradigm of Public Management? Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House.
  2. Bourgon, J. (2007). Responsive, responsible and respected government: Towards a New Public Administration theory. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(1), 7-26.
  3. Bourgon, J. (2011). A New Synthesis of Public Administration: Serving in the 21st Century. Montreal and Kingston: McGill- Queen's University Press.
  4. Central Statistical Office. (2018a). Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland 2017. Warsaw: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
  5. Central Statistical Office. (2018b). Structural Changes of Groups of Entities in the National Economy in the REGON Register, 2017. Warsaw: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
  6. Christensen, T. & Laegreid, P. (2011). Complexity and hybrid public administration - theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407-423. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225361657_Complexity_and_Hybrid_Public_Administration_Theoretical_and_Empirical_Challenges (last accessed: 5 January 2019).
  7. Chudziński, P. (Ed.) (2018a). Zarządzanie przedsiębiorstwem wodociągowym. Uwarunkowania funkcjonowania i współczesne koncepcje zarządzania. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
  8. Chudziński, P. (Ed.) (2018b). Zarządzanie przedsiębiorstwem wodociągowym. Społeczne aspekty funkcjonowania i pomiar efektywności. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
  9. Denhardt, J.V. & Denhardt, R.B. (2011). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. 3rd Edition. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
  10. Drechsler, W. (2005a). The rise and demise of the New Public Management. Post-autistics Economic Review, 33, 17-28. Retrieved from http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue33/Drechsler33.htm (last accessed 28 December 2018).
  11. Drechsler, W. (2005b). The re-emergence of 'Weberian' public administration after the fall of New Public Management: The Central and Eastern European perspective. Halduskultuur - Administrative Culture, 6, 94-108.
  12. Drechsler, W. & Kattel, R. (2008). Towards the Neo-Weberian state? Perhaps, but certainly adieu, NPM! NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), 95-99.
  13. Dunn, W. & Miller, D. (2007). A critique of the New Public Management and the Neo-Weberian state: Advancing a critical theory of administrative reform. Public Organization Review, 7(4), 345-358.
  14. Emery, Y. & Giauque, D. (2014). The hybrid universe of public administration in the 21st century. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(1), 23-32.
  15. Kostakis, V. (2011). Commons-Based Peer Production and the Neo-Weberian State" Synergies and Interdependencies. Halduskultuur - Administrative Culture, 12(2), 146-161.
  16. Levitas, A. (2018). Local government reform as state building: What the Polish case says about "decentralisation". Zarządzanie Publiczne - Public Governance, 3(45), 5-25.
  17. Lynn, L. (2008). What is a Neo-Weberian state? Reflections on a concept and its implications. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), 17-30.
  18. Najwyższa Izba Kontroli. (2016). Kształtowanie cen usług za dostarczanie wody i odprowadzanie ścieków. Warszawa: Najwyższa Izba Kontroli.
  19. Mazur, S. (ed.) (2016). The Neo-Weberian State: Towards a New Paradigm of Public Management? Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House.
  20. Osborne, S.P. (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-388. Retrieved from http://spp.xmu.edu.cn/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/the-New-Public-Governance.pdf (last accessed 29 December 2018).
  21. Osborne, S.P. (2010). The New Public Governance. London: Routledge.
  22. Peters, B.G. (2001). The Future of Governing, 2nd rev. edn, Kansas UP: Lawrence.
  23. Pollitt, Ch. (2008). An overview of the papers and propositions of the first Trans-European Dialogue (TEDI). NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), 9-16.
  24. Pollitt, Ch. & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. Pollitt, Ch. & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Randma-Liiv, T. (2008). New Public Management versus the Neo-Weberian State in Central and Eastern Europe. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), 69-81.
  27. Robinson, M. (2015). From Old Public Administration to the New Public Service Implications for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. Singapore: UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence.
  28. Sejm. (1990). Ustawa o samorządzie gminnym. Dz. U.1990 Nr 16 poz. 95.
  29. Sejm. (2018a). Prawo wodne. Dz. U. 2018 poz. 2268.
  30. Sejm. (2018b). Ustawa o zbiorowym zaopatrzeniu w wodę i zbiorowym odprowadzaniu ścieków. Dz. U. 2018 poz. 650.
  31. Weber, E.P. & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334-349.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1898-3529
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/ZP.2018.46.4.04
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu