BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Elexa Ľuboš (Matej Bel University, Slovakia), Lesáková Ľubica (Matej Bel University, Slovakia), Klementová Vladimíra (Matej Bel University, Slovakia), Klement Ladislav (Matej Bel University, Slovakia)
Identification of Prospective Industrial Clusters in Slovakia
Engineering Management in Production and Services, 2019, nr 2, s. 31-42, rys., tab., bibliogr. 50 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Klastry, Polityka regionalna, Rozwój regionalny, Analiza przesunięć udziałów
Business cluster, Regional policy, Regional development, Shift-share analysis
Republika Słowacka
Slovak Republic
Clusters became an integral part of regional policies intended to build and strengthen competitive advantages within specifically identified geographical areas. They are still considered crucial for economic development and employment, although their orientation has slightly changed as the distance and geographical boundaries lost their importance. This article analyses crucial regional data that indicates potentially beneficial economic concentrations as an assumption for the preparation of prospective clusters in Slovakia. Potential clusters were identified based on significant employment concentrations of particular regional industries that appear extraordinary when compared with national employment and the dynamic development within the selected time frame. Prospective clusters were identified, and opportunities of their development were described, including the harmonisation with the current regional and urban strategy. Analysing absolute and relative quantities in employment, sections and divisions of SK NACE were used for the proper identification of industries. The location quotient served as a tool for the spatial concentration of employment in the Banská Bystrica region, the threshold value for the selection of cluster candidates was set to 2. The shift-share analysis was used for the identification of long-term changes in employment, and 10% of the most dynamic industries were presented at the level of divisions once and then, at the level of sections of SK NACE. Forestry and logging, the manufacture of wood products and the manufacture of basic metals were confirmed by both methods as significant concentrations. The result partially corresponded with the previously active and currently inactive cluster in Banská Bystrica, which was focused on mechanical engineering, still significant when considering numbers of companies and employees as well as sales. Forestry was the most concentrated industry, while the wholesale and retail trades were the most dynamic. Forestry, logging and manufacture of wood products might be strongly interlinked with the current entrepreneurial and social strategy of self-governing regions that is still at the stage of potential cluster identification and fitting to its priorities. The article assumed basic quantitative methods utilised for the identification of prospective clusters. It confirmed the practicality of their application, the gravity of data processing and also certain possible limitations due to the extraordinary focus on the employment concentration. According to the analysis and gained results, the former cluster in the Banská Bystrica region was confirmed as the potentially significant actor in the regional policy (although, currently, having no industrial or public interest) and the new cluster candidates were identified. Outcomes indicated the need to continue the research with a more detailed examination of qualitative aspects that could complete the effort by focusing on clusters not only having higher employment statistics but also the support from regional institutions, also reflecting the preferences of businesses. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka SGH im. Profesora Andrzeja Grodka
Pełny tekst
  1. Andersen, P., & Bollingtoft, A. (2011). Cluster-based global firms' use of local capabilities. Management Research Review 34(10), 1087-1106.
  2. Arthur, W.B. (1990). Silicon Valley locational clusters: when do increasing returns imply monopoly? Mathematical Social Sciences, 19, 235-251.
  3. Barff, R.A., & Knight, P.L. (1998). Dynamic shift-share analysis. Growth and Change 19(2), 1-10.
  4. Bartik, T.J. (2004). Economic Development. In Aronson, R., & Schwartz, E. (Eds.), Management Policies in Local Government Finance (pp. 355-395). Washington, United States: Intl City County Management Assn.
  5. Bergman, E.M., & Feser, E.J. (1999). Industrial and Regional Clusters: Concept and Comparative Applications Web Book in Regional Science, Regional Research Institute. Retrieved from
  6. Bottazzi, G., Dosi, G., Fagiolo, G., & Secchi, A. (2007). Modeling industrial evolution in geographical space. Journal of Economic Geography 7, 651-672.
  7. Bottazzi, G., & Gragnolati, U. (2015). Cities and clusters: Economy-wide and sector-specific effects in corporate location. Regional Studies 49, 113-129.
  8. Britton, J. (2003). Network Structure of an Industrial Cluster: Electronics in Toronto. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 35(6), 983-1006.
  9. Brenner, T. (2006). An Identification of Local Industrial Clusters in Germany. Regional Studies 40, 991-1004.
  10. Cygler, J., & Sroka, W. (2014). Structural pathologies in inter-organizational networks and their consequences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 110, 52-63.
  11. Crawley, A., Beynon, M., & Munday, M. (2013). Making location quotients more relevant as a policy aid in regional spatial analysis. Urban Studies 50, 1854-1869.
  12. Ellison, G., & Glaeser, E.L. (1997). Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy 105, 889-927.
  13. European Commission. (2007). Maritime clusters Commission Staff Working Document. Belgium: European Commission.
  14. Ferencz, V., Dugas, J., & Turisová, R. (2013). Klastre, výhody členstva v klastri [Clusters and the advantages of membership]. Journal of Innovations and Applied Statistics 3(2), 38-51.
  15. Felzensztein, Ch., Gimmon, E., & Aqueveque, C. (2012). Clusters or un-clustered industries? Where inter-firm marketing cooperation matters. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27(5), 392-402.
  16. Freedman, M. (2008). Job hopping, earnings dynamics, and industrial agglomeration in the software publishing industries. Journal of Urban Economics 64, 590-600.
  17. Getis, A., & Ord, J.K. (1992): The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis 24, 189-206.
  18. Hervas-Oliver, J.L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Alvarado, R.R., & Estelles-Miguel, S. (2018). Agglomerations and firm performance: who benefits and how much? Regional Studies 52(3), 338-349.
  19. INNO. 2010. Clusters and clustering policy: a guide for regional and local policy makers. Retrieved from:
  20. Isaksen, A. (1996). Towards increased regional specialization? The quantitative importance of new industrial spaces in Norway, 1970-1990. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 50(2).
  21. Isaksen, A. (1998). Regionalization and Regional Clusters as Development Strategies in a Global Economy STEP Group report.
  22. Jacobs, J. (1969). The Economy of Cities New York, United States: Vintage Books.
  23. Karlsson, C. (1999). Spatial industrial dynamics in Sweden: urban growth industries. Growth and Change 30(2).
  24. Klement, L., Lesáková, Ľ., Klementová, V., & Elexa, Ľ. (2016). Innovation performance of the Slovak Republic. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia 4(3), 115-126.
  25. Knoben, J., Arikan, A.T., Oort, F., & Raspe, O. (2016). Agglomeration and firm performance: one firm's medicine is another firm's poison. Environment and Planning 48(1), 132-153.
  26. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy 99, 483-499.
  27. Lee, C.Y. (2009). Do firms in clusters invest in R&D more intensively? Theory and evidence from multicountry data. Research Policy 38, 1159-1171.
  28. Lesáková, Ľ. (2014). Small and medium enterprises in the new world of globalization. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia 2(3), 111-122.
  29. Lesáková, Ľ., Klementová, V., Elexa, Ľ., & Klement, L. (2017). Súčasný stav a perspektívy rozvoja technologických klastrov v Slovenskej republike The current state and perspectives of technological clusters development in the Slovak Republic Banská Bystrica, Slovakia: Belianum.
  30. Lindqvist, G., Malmberg, A., Sӧlvell, O. (2008). Swedish Cluster Maps Stockholm, Sweden: Centre for Strategy and Competitiveness.
  31. Maggioni, M., & Riggi, M. (2008). High-Tech Firms and the Dynamics of Innovative Industrial Clusters. In Karlsson, C. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Innovation and Clusters: Cases and Policies (pp. 54-78). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  32. Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (1997). Towards and Explanation of Regional Specialization and Industry Agglomeration European Planning Studies, 5(1), 25-41.
  33. Matáková, K., & Stejskal, J. (2012). Assessment of Shift-share analysis suitable for identification of industrial clusters in regions Ekonomický Časopis 60(9), 935-948.
  34. McRae, W.P. (2004). Wine and Regional Tourism: cluster complementarity and regional development Proceedings of the New Zealand Tourism and Hospitality Research Conference
  35. Moretti, E. (2011). Local labor markets. Handbook of Labor Economics 4, 1237-1313.
  36. OECD (2001). Cities and Regions in New Learning Economy Paris, France: OECD.
  37. Munnich, L.W., & Iacono, M. (2016). Competitive industry clusters and transportation in Minnesota. Competitiveness Review 26(1), 25-40.
  38. Park, S. (2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and implications for innovative cluster policies. AI and Society 33(3), 433-445.
  39. Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review 76, 77-90.
  40. Potomová, J., & Letková, J. (2011). Problémy identifikácie potenciálnych odvetví vhodných pre vznik a rozvoj klastra [The problems of identification of potential industries for set up and development of cluster]. Acta Geographica Universitatis Comenianae 55(1), 99-113.
  41. Power, D., & Lundmark, M. (2004). Working through knowledge pools: labor market dynamics, the transference of knowledge and ideas, and industrial clusters. Urban Studies 41, 1025-1044.
  42. Rigby, D. L., & Brown, W. M. (2015). Who benefits from agglomeration? Regional Studies 49(1), 28-43.
  43. Shi, C., & Yang, Y. (2008). Review of Shift Share Analysis and Its Application in Tourism. International Journal of Management Perspectives 1(1), 21-30.
  44. Sӧlvell, O., Lindqvist, G., & Ketels, C. (2006). The Cluster Initiative Greenbook. Stockholm, Sweden: Bromma tryck AB.
  45. Sӧlvell, O., Lindqvist, G., & Ketels, C. (2009). The European Cluster Observatory: EU Cluster Mapping and Strengthening Clusters in Europe Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  46. Täucher, K., & Laudien, S.M. (2018). Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces. European Management Journal 36(3), 319-329.
  47. John, C.H., & Pouder, R.W. (2006). Technology Clusters versus Industry Clusters: Resources, Networks, and Regional Advantages. Growth and Change 37(2), 141-171.
  48. Šebestová, J., Šperka, R., Małecka, J., & Łuczka, T. (2017). Co-working centers as a potential supportive network for cross-border business cooperation. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia 5(4), 23-34.
  49. Yasin, M., Alavi, J., Sobral, F., & Lisboa, J. (2004). A shift-share analysis approach to understanding the dynamic of the Portuguese tourism market. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 17(4), 11-22.
  50. Žižka, M., & Rydvalová, P. (2014). Influence of clusters on the intensity of innovation outputs. Amfiteatru Economic 16(37), 994-1012.
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu