BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Gorączkowska Jadwiga (University of Zielona Góra, Poland), Tomaszewski Marek (WSB University in Poznań)
Tytuł
Support of Innovation Activity in Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Greater Poland Voivodeship
Źródło
Ekonomia i Prawo, 2019, t. 18, nr 2, s. 183-195, bibliogr. 17 poz.
Economics and Law
Słowa kluczowe
Innowacje, Małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa, Park nauki i technologii, Rozwój gospodarczy a małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa
Innovations, Small business, Science and Technology Park, Economic development and small business
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: O31, O32, L60.
summ.
Abstrakt
Motivation: Small and medium-sized enterprises, due to their large number, play an important role in the development of the Polish economy. Therefore, the focus should be on creating the right frameworks for their functioning - they should allow them to develop and stimulate the implementation of innovative solutions. Business support organizations (BSOs) are one of the entities that can facilitate development ant stimulation. The main types of BSOs in Poland are: technological parks and incubators, academic business incubators, centers for technology transfer, business angels networks, local/regional load funds, credit guarantee funds, and training and consulting centers. These entities should contribute to the implementation of new solutions in the surveyed enterprises and improve their competitive position. Aim: The aim of the article is to identify impact of business support organization on the innovation activity in industrial enterprises in the Greater Poland Voivodeship. The research hypothesis is the claim that BSOs increase the odds of implementation of new products and process in enterprises, but their impact will be different. The hypothesis will be validated on a sample of 442 small and medium-sized, manufacturing companies, which are located in Greater Poland Voivodeship. To carry out the study a multi-factor logit regression method will be used. Results: The research hypothesis is confirmed - BSOs increase the chances on innovation activity but their influence is different. Most effective are training and consulting centers and financing organizations, but this institution stimulate the implementation of new products and processes on the scale of the enterprise and innovation centers (technology parks, academic business incubators and technology transfer offices) of the country.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Barra, C., & Zotti, R. (2018). The contribution of university, private and public sector resources to Italian regional innovation system (in)efficiency. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(2). doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9539-7.
  2. Castillo, F., Gilless, J.K., Heiman, A., & Zilberman, D. (2018). Time of adoption and intensity of technology transfer: an institutional analysis of offices of technology transfer in the United States. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(1). doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9468-5.
  3. Danieluk, B. (2010). Zastosowanie regresji logistycznej w badaniach eksperymentalnych. Psychologia Społeczna, 5(2-3).
  4. Diez-Vial, I., & Montoro-Sanchez, A. (2016). How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: the case of a science park. Technovation, 50-51. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.001.
  5. GUS. (2017). Rocznik statystyczny przemysłu 2017. Retrieved 18.01.2019 from https://stat.gov.pl.
  6. Koprowska-Skalska, E. (2010). Ośrodki szkoleniowo-doradcze. In K.B. Matusiak (Ed.), Ośrodki innowacji i przedsiębiorczości w Polsce. Raport 2010. Warszawa: PARP.
  7. Local Data Bank. (2018). Retrieved 18.01.2019 from https://bdl.stat.gov.pl.
  8. Maddala, G.S. (2006). Ekonometria. Warszawa: PWN.
  9. Makarevich, A. (2018). Ties of survival: specialization, inter-firm ties, and firm failure in the US venture capital industry. Journal of Business Research, 86. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.001.
  10. Matusiak, K.B. (2011). Ośrodki innowacji i przedsiębiorczości. In K.B. Matusiak (Ed.), Innowacje i transfer technologii. Słownik pojęć. Warszawa: PARP. Retrieved 18.01.2019 from http://www.pi.gov.pl.
  11. OECD, & Eurostat. (2005). Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd edition: The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264013100-en.
  12. Pietras, P. & Głodek, P. (2011). Finansowanie przedsięwzięć innowacyjnych w MSP. Warszawa: PARP. Retrieved 18.01.2019 from http://www.pi.gov.pl.
  13. Rocio Vasquez-Urriago, A., Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego Rico, A. (2016). Science and technology parks and cooperation for innovation: empirical evidence from Spain. Research Policy, 45(1). doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.006.
  14. Stanisz, A. (2007). Przystępny kurs statystyki. Modele liniowe i nieliniowe. Kraków: Statsoft.
  15. Stokan, E., Thompson, L., & Mahu, R.J. (2015). Testing the differential effect of business incubators on firm growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 29(4). doi:10.1177/0891242415597065.
  16. Świadek, A. (2011). Regionalne systemy innowacji w Polsce. Warszawa: Difin.
  17. Welfe, A. (2008). Ekonometria. Warszawa: PWE.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1898-2255
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2019.014
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu