BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Mazur Karolina (Uniwersytet Zielonogórski)
Tytuł
The Problem of Ambidexterity in the Context of Internationalization
Problem ambidexterity w kontekście internacjonalizacji
Źródło
Informatyka Ekonomiczna / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu, 2018, nr 4 (50), s. 94-107, tab., bibliogr. 36 poz.
Business Informatics / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu
Słowa kluczowe
Innowacje, Internacjonalizacja, Organizacja
Innovations, Internationalization, Organisation
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: D23, D24, D83, L25, O31, O32
summ., streszcz.
Abstrakt
Artykuł dotyczy problemu ambidexterity w kontekście internacjonalizacji. Jego celem jest ustalenie, w jaki sposób podeście ambidexterity do organizacji wpływa na proces innowacji w zinternacjonalizowanym biznesie. Problem został przeanalizowany z uwzględnieniem zmiennych efektywnościowych, takich jak sprawność organizacyjna, sprawność innowacyjna i sprawność internacjonalizacji. Wykorzystano technikę systematycznego przeglądu literatury. W artykule zidentyfikowano wyniki głównych badań dotyczących problemu ambidexterity w kontekście internacjonalizacji. Przeanalizowano zbiór 19 opracowań. W tekście zaprezentowano najważniejsze ograniczenia dotychczasowych badań i wskazano przyszłe możliwości badawcze.(abstrakt oryginalny)

The paper refers to the problem of ambidexterity in the international context. The purpose of this paper is to examine how ambidexterity enhances the process of innovation in international business. The problem has been analysed with the application of organizational performance measures including economic performance, innovation performance and international performance. The author used a systematic review of the literature as a research tool. The research was conducted based on the papers included in the international databases contained in international and domestic research papers. The tests included six digital databases (EBSCO, PROQUEST, ELSEVIER, EMERALD, JSTOR and WILEY) with most of the digital publications including words: "internationalization", "innovation" and "ambidexterity". The main research result was thus identified. The set of 19 research studies was the object of analysis. The author presented the general limitations of the research studies which created the possibilities of future projects' development.(original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Alpkan L., Şanalb M., Ayden Y., 2012, Market orientation, ambidexterity and performance outcomes, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 41, pp. 461-468.
  2. Atuahene-Gima K., Murray J.Y., 2007, Explorative and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China, Journal of International Marketing, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1-29.
  3. Barlatier P.J., Dupouet O., 2015, Achieving contextual ambidexterity with communities of practice at GDF SUEZ, Global Business and Organizational Excellence, no. 2, pp. 43-53.
  4. Benitez J., Castillo A., Llorens J., Braojos J., 2018, IT-enabled knowledge ambidexterity and innovation performance in small U.S. firms: The moderator role of social media capability, Information & Management, vol. 55, pp. 131-143.
  5. Boumgarden P., Nickerson J., Zenger T.R., 2012, Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationship among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 33, pp. 587-610.
  6. Bresciani S., Ferraris A., Del Giudice M., 2017, The management of organizational ambidexterity through alliances in a new context of analysis: Internet of Things (IoT) smart city projects, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
  7. Caves R.E., 1971, International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment, Economica, vol. 38, pp. 1-27.
  8. Derbyshire J., 2014, The impact of ambidexterity on enterprise performance: Evidence from 15 countries and 14 sectors, Technovation, vol. 34, pp. 574-581.
  9. Gibson C.B., Birkinshaw J., 2004, The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 209-226.
  10. Gupta A.K., Smith K.G., Shalley C.E., 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 49, pp. 693-708.
  11. Han M., Celly N., 2008, Strategic ambidexterity and performance in international new ventures, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 335-349.
  12. Hsu C.-W., Lien Y.-C., Chen H., 2013, International ambidexterity and firm performance in small emerging economies, Journal of World Business, vol. 48, pp. 58-67.
  13. Hughes M., Martin S.L., Morgan R.E., Robson R.J, 2010, Realizing product-market advantage in high-technology international new ventures: The mediating role of ambidextrous innovation, Journal of International Marketing, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1-21.
  14. Hymer S.H., 1976, The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  15. Jansen J., van den Bosch F., Volbreda H., 2006, Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators, Management Science, vol. 52, pp. 1661-1674.
  16. Jantunen A., Nummela N., Puumalinen K., Saarenketo S., 2008, Strategic orientation of born globals - do they really matter?, Journal of World Business, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 158-170.
  17. Karafyllia M., Zucchella A., 2017, Synergies and tensions between and within domestic and international market activities of firms, International Business Review, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 942-958.
  18. Lee K., Woo H.-G., Joshi K., 2017, Pro-innovation culture, ambidexterity and new product development performance: polynomial regression and response surface analysis, European Management Journal, vol. 35, pp. 249-260.
  19. Leonard-Barton D., 1992, Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13, pp. 111-125.
  20. Levitt B., March J.G., 1988, Organizational learning, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 14, pp. 319--340.
  21. Li Z., Gao Q., 2017, Ambidexterity strategic model-behavior logic and path choice, Chinese Management Studies, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 751-777.
  22. March J.G., 1988, Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, vol. 2, pp. 71-87.
  23. Martin S.L., Javalgi R.G., Cavusgil E., 2017, Marketing capabilities, positional advantage, and performance of born global firms: Contingent effect of ambidextrous innovation, International Business Review, vol. 26, pp. 527-543.
  24. Mashahadi F., Ahmad N.H., Mohamad O., 2016a, Market orientation and innovation ambidexterity: A synthesized model for internationally operated Herbal-based Small and Medium Enterprises (HbSMEs), Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 37, pp. 145-151.
  25. Mashahadi F., Ahmad N.H., Mohamad O., 2016b, Strategic innovation ambidexterity and the internationalization performance of small and medium enterprises: An insight into Herbal-based Small and Medium Enterprises (HbSMEs), World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 161-175.
  26. Mazur K., Inków M., 2017, Methodological aspects of innovation performance measurement in the IT sector, Management, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 14-27.
  27. Monferrer D., Blesa A., Ripollés M., 2015, Born globals through knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and network market orientation, Business Research Quarterly, vol. 18, pp. 18-36.
  28. Nielsen B.B., Gudergan S., 2012, Exploration and exploitation fit and performance in international strategic alliances, International Business Review, vol. 21, pp. 558-574.
  29. Peng X., Wu D., 2013, Tie diversity, ambidexterity and upgrading of the latecomer firm in global production networks: Evidence from China's plastic equipment industry, Chinese Management Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 310-327.
  30. Prange C., Bruyaka O., 2016, Better at home, abroad, or both? How Chinese firms use ambidextrous internationalization strategies to drive innovation, Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 306-339.
  31. Radner R., 1975, A behavioral model of cost reduction, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 6, pp. 196-215.
  32. Raisch S., Birkinshaw J., 2008, Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, vol. 34, pp. 375-409.
  33. Tushman M.L., O'Reilly C.A., 1996, Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and rev-olutionary change, California Management Review, vol. 38, pp. 8-30.
  34. Xu H., Feng Y., Zhou L., 2015, Market Knowledge Development of Indigenous Chinese Firms for Overseas Expansion: Insights from a Marketing Ambidexterity Perspective, [in:] Chan T., Cui G. (eds.), Asian Businesses in a Turbulent Environment, AIB Southeast Asia, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  35. Yang M., Gabrielsson P., 2017, Entrepreneurial marketing of international high-tech business-to-business new ventures: A decision-making process perspective, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 64, pp. 147-160.
  36. Zhou Y., Lu L., Chang X., 2016, Averting risk or embracing opportunity? Exploring the impact of ambidextrous capabilities on innovation of Chinese firms in internationalization, Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 569-589.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1507-3858
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15611/ie.2018.4.07
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu