BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Mroczek Teresa (University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszów), Skica Tomasz (University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszów, Poland), Rodzinka Jacek (University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszów)
Tytuł
The Impact of Regional Diversification in the Size of the General Government Sector on the Economies of EU Countries
Wpływ regionalnego zróżnicowania rozmiaru sektora finansów publicznych na gospodarki państw Unii Europejskiej
Źródło
Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 2019, nr 2 (63), s. 65-80, rys., tab., bibliogr. 82 poz.
Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics
Słowa kluczowe
Finanse publiczne, Sieci bayesowskie, Gospodarka
Public finance, Bayesian network, Economy
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: E62, H11, H20, H50, H60
streszcz., summ.
Firma/Organizacja
Unia Europejska (UE)
European Union (EU)
Abstrakt
Głównym celem artykułu jest ukazanie wpływu regionalnego zróżnicowania rozmiaru sektora finansów publicznych na gospodarki państw Unii Europejskiej. Do osiągnięcia tego celu konieczne jest zobrazowanie rozmiaru zarówno sektora finansów publicznych, jak i gospodarki - za pośrednictwem zmiennych umożliwiających ich porównanie w czasie i w przestrzeni. Mając to na uwadze, sektor finansów publicznych zobrazowano za pośrednictwem dziewięciu zmiennych, a gospodarka została opisana za pomocą trzynastu zmiennych wyjaśniających. Złożoność tego zjawiska wymaga realizacji niekonwencjonalnego podejścia w tej dziedzinie badań. Podejście autorów opiera się na inteligentnej analizie danych (IDA) - metodologii obejmującej zestaw technik, które można zastosować do wydobywania użytecznej wiedzy z dużej ilości danych. W celu wskazania opisanych związków w artykule zastosowało techniki probabilistyczne - sieci Bayesa.(abstrakt oryginalny)

The main objective of this article is proving how the regional diversification in the size of general government sector influences the economies of EU countries. To achieve this, presenting both the size of the general government sector and of the economy, using variables which enable comparison in time and space, is essential. Bearing this in mind, the general government sector has been depicted by nine variables and the economy has been described by thirteen explanatory variables. The complexity of the phenomenon imposes the implementation of an unconventional approach in this field of exploration. Our approach is based on Intelligent Data Analysis (IDA) - a methodology that includes a set of techniques that can be applied for extracting useful knowledge from large amounts of data. In order to indicate the impact of regional diversification in the size of the general government sector on the EU countries' economies, probabilistic techniques were applied - Bayesian Networks. Analysis made in the study showed that the largest impact of the GGS size on the economy was identified in Portugal and Slovakia. The results of the studies show that the most "responsive" to the size of the GGS variable describing the economy was gross domestic product per inhabitant. The research proved that the economies of some countries showed similarities in the effect of the size of the general government sector on the parameters of the economy. We have identified five groups of such countries.(original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Abdieva R., Baigonushova D., Ganiev J., 2017, Relationship between government expenditure and economic growth in transition countries: The case of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, Bilig, 83, pp. 241-258.
  2. Acha I.A., Michael E.I., Essien J.M., 2017, Nigeria's investment environment: issues of economic growth and development, Expert Journal of Finance, 5, pp. 1-11.
  3. Afonso A., Furceri D., 2010, Government size, composition, volatility and economic growth, European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), pp. 517-532.
  4. Afonso A., Jalles J., 2011, Economic performance and government size, https://www.econstor. eu/bitstream/10419/153832/1/ecbwp1399.pdf (2018.10.08).
  5. Agell J., Lindh T., Ohlsson H., 1997, Growth and the public sector: A critical review essay, European Journal of Political Economy, 13(1), pp. 33-52.
  6. Agell J., Ohlsson H., Thoursie P.S., 2006, Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries: A comment, European Economic Review, 50(1), pp. 211-218.
  7. Aleksandrovich A., Upadhyaya K.P., 2015, Government size and economic growth: evidence from selected OECD countries, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(5).
  8. Al-Fawwaz T.M., 2015, The impact of government expenditures on economic growth in Jordan (1980-2013), International Business Research, 9(1).
  9. Altunc O.F., Aydın C., 2013, The relationship between optimal size of government and economic growth: empirical evidence from Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, pp. 66-75.
  10. Armey R., 1995, The Freedom Revolution, Regnery, Washington, DC.
  11. Asimakopoulos S., Karavias Y., 2016, The impact of government size on economic growth: A threshold analysis, Economics Letters, 139, pp. 65-68.
  12. Bairam E.I., 1988, Government expenditure and economic growth: reflections on Professor Ram's, Keio Economic Studies, 25(1), pp. 59-66.
  13. Barro R.J., 1989, A cross-country study of growth, saving and government, NBER Working Paper.
  14. Barth J.R., Bradley M.D., 1988, The impact of government spending on economic activity, National Chamber Foundation.
  15. Bergh A., Karlsson M., 2010, Government size and growth: accounting for economic freedom and globalization, Public Choice, 142(1-2), pp. 195-213.
  16. Bose N., Haque M.E., Osborn D.R., 2003, Public Expenditure and Growth in Developing Countries: Education is the Key, Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research Discussion Paper Series, 30.
  17. Buti M., Martinez-Mongay C., Sekkat K., Van den Noord P., 2003, Macroeconomic policy and Structural Reform: A Conflict between Stabilization and Flexibility. Monetary and Fiscal Policies in the EMU: Interactions and Coordination, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 187- -216.
  18. Cameron D.R., 1982, On the limits of the public economy, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 459(1), pp. 46-62.
  19. Chao J.C., Grubel H., 1998, Optimal levels of spending and taxation in Canada. How to use the fiscal surplus: What is the optimal size of government, pp. 53-68, https://www.fraserinstitute.org/ sites/default/files/HowtoUseFiscalSurplusOptimalLevels.pdf (2018 10 09).
  20. Chen S.T., Lee C.C., 2005, Government size and economic growth in Taiwan: A threshold regression approach, Journal of Policy Modeling, 27(9), pp. 1051-1066.
  21. Chickering D.M., 2002, Optimal structure identification with greedy search, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, pp. 507-55.
  22. Chiou-Wei S.Z., Zhu Z., Kuo Y.H., 2010, Government size and economic growth: an application of the smooth transition regression model, Applied Economics Letters, 17(14), pp. 1405-1415.
  23. Chobanov D., Mladenova A., 2009, What is the optimum size of government?, Bulgaria, Institute for Market Economics.
  24. Cobb B., 2011, Graphical models for economic profit maximization, Informed Transactions on Education, 11(2), pp. 43-56.
  25. Colombier C., 2009, Growth effects of fiscal policies: An application of robust modified M-estimator, Applied Economics, 41(7), pp. 899-912.
  26. Conte M.A., Darrat A.F., 1988, Economic growth and the expanding public sector: A reexamination, The Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 322-330.
  27. Dar A.A., AmirKhalkhali S., 2002, Government size, factor accumulation, and economic growth: Evidence from OECD countries, Journal of Policy Modeling, 24(7-8), pp. 679-692.
  28. Davies A., 2009, Human development and the optimal size of government, The Journal of Socio- Economics, 38(2), pp. 326-330.
  29. Dechter R., 1999, Bucket elimination: A unifying framework for inference, Artificial Intelligence 113(1-2), pp. 41-85.
  30. Di Liddo G., Magazzino C., Porcelli F., 2015, Decentralization, growth and optimal government size in the Italian regional framework, Working Papers 0115, CREI Università degli Studi Roma Tre, revised 2015.
  31. Dudzevičiūtė G., Šimelytė A., Liučvaitienė A., 2017, Government expenditure and economic growth in the European Union countries, International Journal of Social Economics (just-accepted, 00-00.
  32. Engen E., Skinner J., 1992, Fiscal Policy and Growth, NBER Working Paper.
  33. Fölster S., Henrekson M., 2001, Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries, European Economic Review, 45(8), pp. 1501-1520.
  34. Forte F., Magazzino C., 2010, Optimal size of government and economic growth in the EU-27, MPRA papers (26669).
  35. Forte F., Magazzino C., 2011, Optimal size government and economic growth in EU countries. Economia Politica, 28(3), pp. 295-322.
  36. Gadewadikar J., Kuljaca O., Agyepong K., Sarigul E., Zheng Y., Zhang P., 2010, Exploring Bayesian networks for medical decision support in breast cancer detection, African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research, 3(10), pp. 225-231.
  37. Gisore N., Kiprop S., Kalio A., Ochieng J., Kibet L., 2014, Effect of government expenditure on economic growth in East Africa: A disaggregated model, European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 3(8), pp. 289-304.
  38. Grier K.B., Tullock G., 1989, An empirical analysis of cross-national economic growth, 1951-1980, Journal of Monetary Economics, 24(2), pp. 259-276.
  39. Gunalp B., Dincer O.C., 2010, The optimal government size in transition countries, Progress in Economics Research, vol. 15, pp. 153-169.
  40. Hagmayer Y., Sloman S.A., Lagnado D.A., Waldmann M.R., 2007, Causal Reasoning through Intervention, [in:] A. Gopnik, L. Schulz (eds., Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy and Computation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  41. Handoussa H., Reiffers J.L., 2003, Femise report on the Euro-Mediterranean partnership - analysis and proposals of the Euro-Mediterranean forum of economic institutes, Institut de la Méditerranée, France, Retrieved September 17, 2008, from http://www.femise.net/PDF/Femise_ A2003gb.pdf.
  42. Harding N.J., 2011, Application of Bayesian Networks to Problems within Obesity Epidemiology. Dissertation, University of Manchester Publishing, Manchester.
  43. Heitger B., 2001, The scope of government and its impact on economic growth in OECD countries, Kiel Working Paper, no. 1034.
  44. Jensen F.V., Nielsen T.D., 2007, Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, 2nd edition, Springer- Verlag, New York.
  45. Jiranyakul K., 2007, The relation between government expenditures and economic growth in Thailand, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/88426/1/MPRA_paper_88426.pdf (2018.10.09).
  46. Karras G., 1997, On the optimal government size in Europe: Theory and empirical evidence, The Manchester School, 65(3), pp. 280-294.
  47. Korb K., Hope L., Nicholson A., Axnick K., 2014, Varieties of causal intervention, Pacific Rim Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  48. Kormendi R.C., Megurie P.G., 1985, Macroeconomic determinants of growth: Cross-country evidence, Journal of Monetary Economics, 16, pp. 141-163.
  49. Koski T.J., Noble J.M., 2012, A review of Bayesian networks and structure learning, Mathematica Applicanda, 40(1), pp. 53-103.
  50. Kustepeli Y., 2005, The relationship between government size and economic growth: Evidence from a panel data analysis, Dokuz Eylül University-Faculty of Business-Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series, 6, pp. 1-52.
  51. Lahirushan K.P.K.S., Gunasekara W.G.V., 2015, The impact of government expenditure on economic growth: A study of Asian countries, International Journal of Social, Behavioural, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 9(9), pp. 2995-3003.
  52. Landau D., 1983, Government expenditure and economic growth: A cross-country study, Southern Economic Journal, pp. 783-792.
  53. Leshoro T.L., 2017, An empirical analysis of disaggregated government expenditure and economic growth in South Africa https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/83637603.pdf (2018 10 09).
  54. Lingxiao Wang, Peculea A.D., Xu H., 2016, The relationship between public expenditure and economic growth in Romania: Does it obey Wagner's or Keynes's law?, Theoretical & Applied Economics, 23(3).
  55. Magazzino C., 2012, Wagner versus Keynes: Public spending and national income in Italy, Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(6), pp. 890-905.
  56. Maku O.E., 2009, Does government spending spur economic growth in Nigeria?, https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen. de/17941/1/MPRA_paper_17941.pdf (2018.10.10).
  57. Marlow M.L., 1986, Private sector shrinkage and the growth of industrialized economies, Public Choice, 49(2), 143-154.
  58. Martins S., Veiga F.J., 2014, Government size, composition of public expenditure, and economic development, International Tax and Public Finance, 21(4), pp. 578-597.
  59. Mehrara M., Keshtgar N., 2016). Government expenditure and economic growth in MENA region, International Journal of Applied, 4(1).
  60. Mose, N., Kalio A., Kiprop S. Kibet L., Babu J., 2015, Effect of Government Expenditure on Economic Growth in East Africa: Panel Data Analysis, Mose, Kalio2, Retrieved on Sept.
  61. Murphy K., 1998, A Brief Introduction to Graphical Models and Bayesian Networks, http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~murphyk/Bayes/bnintro.html.
  62. Odhiambo N.M., 2015, Government expenditure and economic growth in South Africa: An empirical investigation, Atlantic Economic Journal, 43(3), pp. 393-406.
  63. Pearl J., 1988, Probabilistic Inference in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.
  64. Pearl J., 2009, Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference, 2nd edition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  65. Peden E.A., 1991, Productivity in the United States and its relationship to government activity: An analysis of 57 years, 1929-1986, Public Choice, 69(1), pp. 153-173.
  66. Pevcin P., 2004, Does optimal size of government spending exist?, University of Ljubljana, 10(1), pp. 101-135.
  67. Quang A.L., 2010, New Approaches Using Probabilistic Graphical Models in Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Dissertation, Faculty of the USC Graduate School, University of Southern California.
  68. Rahn R., Fox H., 1996, What Is the Optimum Size of Government?, Vernon K. Krieble Foundation.
  69. Ram R., 1986, Government size and economic growth: A new framework and some evidence from cross-section and time-series data, The American Economic Review, 76(1), pp. 191-203.
  70. Romero-Avila D., Strauch, R., 2008, Public finances and long-term growth in Europe: Evidence from a panel data analysis, European Journal of Political Economy, 24(1), pp.172-191.
  71. Sáez M.P., Álvarez-García S., Rodríguez D.C., 2017, Government expenditure and economic growth in the European Union countries: New evidence, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 36(36), pp. 127-133.
  72. Saunders P., 1988, Private sector shrinkage and the growth of industrialized economies: Comment, Public Choice, 58(3), pp. 277-284.
  73. Scully G.W., 1994, What Is the Optimal Size of Government in the United States?, National Centre for Policy Analysis - Policy Report, p. 188.
  74. Scully G.W., 1995, The "growth tax" in the United States, Public Choice, 85(1-2), pp.71-80.
  75. Sesen M.B., Nicholson A.E., Banares-Alcantara R., Kadir T., Brady M., 2013, Bayesian networks for clinical decision support in lung cancer care, PLoS ONE, 8(12), e82349.
  76. Skica T., Rodzinka J. Mroczek T., 2015a, Data mining approach to determine the relationships between the economy and the general government sector size, Finansowy Kwartalnik Internetowy e-Finanse, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1-21.
  77. Skica T., Rodzinka J., Fryc B., 2015b, Application of LEM2 algorithm in identification of relationships between the size of general government sector and the economy, Hyperion International Journal of Econophysics and New Economy, volume 8, issue 2, pp. 361-401.
  78. Spiegelhalter, D. J., 1998, Bayesian graphical modelling: A case - study in monitoring health outcomes, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 47(1), pp. 115-133.
  79. Sriyana J., 2016, Optimum size of government spending in Indonesia, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 11(3), pp. 441-449.
  80. Summer R., Heston A.W., 1984, Improved international comparisons of real product and its comparisons 1950-1977, Review of Income and Wealth, 30.
  81. Vedder R.K., Gallaway L.E., 1998, Government size and economic growth, The Joint Economic Committee.
  82. Zhang N.L., Poole D., 1996, Exploiting causal independence in Bayesian network inference, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 5, pp. 301-328.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1899-3192
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15611/pn.2019.2.06
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu