BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Blašková Martina (University of Žilina, Žilina, Slovakia), Tumová Dominika (University of Žilina, Žilina, Slovakia), Blaško Rudolf (University of Žilina, Žilina, Slovakia)
Tytuł
Relations of University Values and Competences of University Teachers
Źródło
Journal of Intercultural Management, 2019, vol. 11, nr 3, s. 134-157, tab., bibliogr. 41 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Szkolnictwo wyższe, Nauczyciele, Studenci, Kompetencje
Higher education, Teachers, Students, Competences
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: M12
summ., This article is supported by the Ministry of Education of Slovak Republic - Project KEGA No. 041ŽU-4/2017 Experimental Mathematics Accessible for All.
Abstrakt
Objective: The paper deals with the theoretical and empirical examination of university values in relation to key competences of university teachers. The combination of values that universities should prioritize and the competences that university teachers should possess is seen in the paper as an important precondition for improving the quality and acceleration of modern university progress. The theoretical part analyzes, compares and synthesizes opinions on key terms examined in the paper, i.e. higher education, university, values, and competences. The empirical part presents, on the one hand, the results of the questionnaire survey aimed at defining important university values. The survey was carried out on a sample of n = 279 students of the University of Žilina, Slovak Republic, and obtained 1,786 statements on crucial values or sub-values of the university. On the other hand, based on results of the previous survey (n = 27 university teachers) which was targeted on key competences of the great university teachers, the empirical part seeks to experimentally link university key values with teachers' key competences.
Methodology: Analysis, synthesis, comparison, abstraction, questionnaire survey, thinking experiment. Hypothesis H1: University values defined by students will be repeated in the survey, i.e. student views on the core values of university will be identical or similar in content. Negation hypothesis H0: University values defined by students will not be repeated in the survey.
Findings: Respondents reported a total of n0 = 1,786 statements regarding the university values or sub-values. A substantial consensus was found: many of values were repeated for respondents. Defined values were subsequently grouped: from the initially defined n1 = 229 values, n2 = 32 complex values were generated. This leads to a rejection of H0, in favor of H1: the university values generated by students are similar in the content. The results in the evaluative question confirmed the assumption that respondents considered most important mostly those values that the previous open question most frequently reported. Although depending on the study program is always the quality of education in the first place of importance, the order of importance of other values varies to some extent.
Value Added: Opinions on university teachers' competences and university's values were discussed. Experimental linking of university values to competences of teachers was performed based on the survey results conducted by the authors in 2012 (this one consisted of three sequential interviews/workshops with teachers of University of Žilina). A logical conclusion was formulated: All the university teachers and scientists are becoming authorities competent to build, preserve and transform universal knowledge into an ever-higher level.
Recommendations: A conclusion of the paper contains the characteristics recommended for achieve an effective process of developing university competences. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Adamonienė, R., Ruibytė, L., & Šikšnianaitė, N. (2017). Problematic Aspects of the Police Personnel Education System: Sight from Organization's and Employees' Perspectives. Human Resources Management and Ergonomics, 11(2), 6-14.
  2. Agiomirgianakis, G., Lianos, T., & Tsounis, N. (2018). Returns to Investment in Higher Education: Is There a Difference between Distance Learning and Traditional Universities in the Fields of Physics, Mathematics, Social Studies, Computer Science and Economics?. Creative Education, 9(16), 19. doi: 10.4236/ce.2018.916220.
  3. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher Professional Development in Teaching and Teacher Education over Ten Years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20.
  4. Blašková, M., Blaško, R., Jankalová, M., & Jankal, R. (2014). Key Personality Competences of University Teacher: Comparison of Requirements Defined by Teachers and/versus Defined by Students. ELSEVIER: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science, 114(2014), 466-475. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.731.
  5. Blašková, M., Blaško, R., Matuska, E., & Rosak-Szyrocka, A. (2015). Development of Key Competences of University Teachers and Managers. 4th World Conference on Educational Technology Researches (WCETR-2014), Barcelona, October 2014. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182(2015), 187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.755.
  6. Blašková, M., & Hriníková, D. (2019). Axiological Management in Higher Education and Values Defined by Students. Aksiologiceskije aspecty v sovremennych naucnych issledovanijach. Omsk, Russia: Omskij gosudarstvennyj universitet soobscenia. 5-14.
  7. Bowen, H. R., & Fincher, C. (2018a). Efficiency and accountability in higher education. In: H. R. Bowen (Ed.), Investment in Learning. (Chapter 1). e-Book. (Online). Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351309929. Access: 3.04.2019.
  8. Bowen, H. R., & Fincher, C. (2018b). Cognitive learning. In H. R. Bowen (Ed.), Investment in Learning (Chapter 3). e -Book (Online). Available at: h ttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781351309929. Access: 1.04.2019.
  9. Čandík, M. (2018). New Trends in Education of Employees of State Organizations. Human Resources Management and Ergonomics, 12(1), 32-46.
  10. CBI (2017). Helping the UK Thrive: CBI/Pearson Education and Skills Survey 2017, July 2017.
  11. Cewińska, J., & Striker, M. (2018). Lifestyle as a Determinant of Managerial Decisions. Human Resources Management and Ergonomics, 12(1), 47-58.
  12. Coates, H. (2005). The Value of Student Engagement for Higher Education Quality Assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25-36. doi: 10.1080/13538320500074915.
  13. Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and Identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
  14. D'Aguiar, S., & Harrison, N. (2016). Returning from Earning: UK Graduates Returning to Postgraduate Study, with Particular Respect to STEM Subjects, Gender and Ethnicity. Journal of Education and Work, 29, 584-613. doi: 10.1080/13639080.2014.1001332.
  15. Dorri, M., Yarmohammadian, M. H., & Nadi, M. A. (2012). A Review on Value Chain in Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(2012), 3842-3846. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.157.
  16. Figurska, I. (2017). Dignity Management as a New Approach to Human Resources Management. Human Resources Management and Ergonomics, 11(2), 23-37.
  17. Figurska, I., Sokół, A. (2016). The Process of Knowledge Acquisition with the Use of Various Teaching Methods and Its Effect on the Creativity of Employees... Mediterian Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 143-151.
  18. Freeman, R. B. (1981). The Changing Economic Value of Higher Education in Developed Economies: A Report to the O.E.C.D. NBER Working Paper, 820. doi: 10.3386/w0820.
  19. Grant, G., Elbow, P., Ewens, T., Gamson, Z., Kohli, W., Neumann, W., Olesen, V., & Riesman, D. (1979). On Competence: A Critical Analysis of Competence-Based Reforms in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
  20. Grover, S. L., & Brockner, J. (1989). Empathy and the relationship between attitudinal similarity and attraction. Journal of Research Personality, 23, 469-479.
  21. Hill, K., Hoffman, D., & Rex, T. R. (2005). The Value of Higher Education: Individual and Societal Benefits (With Special Consideration for the State of Arizona). Arizona State University: W. P. Carey School of Business, Productivity and Prosperity Projects (P3).
  22. House of Commons Education Committee (2018). Value for Money in Higher Education. Seventh Report of Session 2017-2019. (Online). Available at: www.parliament.uk/education-committee. Access: 6.04.2019.
  23. Jibeen, T., & Khan, M. A. (2015). Internationalization of Higher Education: Potential Benefits and Costs. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 4(4), 196-199.
  24. Kim, H. S., & Chu, T. Q. (2011). Cultural variation in the motivation of self-expression. In: D. Dunning (Ed.), Social Motivation. New York: Psychology Press.
  25. Krasnova, A. (2017). Competences of Coworkers Responsible for Decruitment, Viewed from the Perspective of Young Employees - Survey Results. Proceedings of 14th International Scientific Conference Human Potential Development (pp. 68-78). Benešov near Prague, 6-8 June, 2017. Prague: Institute for Public Administration.
  26. Law, D. (2013). Educational Values and the Values of Higher Education. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 17(3), 81-83. doi: 10.1080/13603108.2013.856355.
  27. Li, D., Granizo, M. G., & Gardó, T. F. (2016). The Value Trade-off in Higher Education Service: A Qualitative Intercultural Approach to Students' Perceptions. Intangible Capital, 12(4), 855-880. doi: 10.3923/ic.706.
  28. Lozano, J. F., Boni, A., Peris, J., & Hueso, A. (2012). Competencies in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis from the Capabilities Approach. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(1), 132-147. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00839.x.
  29. Majchrzak-Lepczyk, J. (2015). Logistyczno-marketingowe aspekty w sieci tworzenia wartości (Logistics and Marketing Aspects in the Value Creation Network). Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 217, 72.
  30. Miller, M. T., & Nadler, D. P. (2016). Creating a Value Added College Environment: The Role of the Hidden Curriculum. In: W. Nuninger, J.-M. Chatelet (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Quality Assurance and Value Management in Higher Education (pp. 85-100). Hershey: Information Science Reference - IGI Global.
  31. Mohamadi, Z., & Malekshahi, N. (2018). Designing and Validating a Potential Formative Evaluation Inventory for Teacher Competences. Language Testing in Asia, 8(6). (Online). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0059-2. Access: 24.04.2019.
  32. Mulder, M., Guligers, J., Wesselink, R., & Biemans, H. (2008). The New Competence Concept in Higher Education: Error or Enrichment?. International Scientific Conference AERA. New York, March 25.
  33. O'Doherty, D., O'Hare, J. A., Hyde, S., & McGrath, D. (2019). Humanities in Medicine: A Qualitative Study of Graduate and Student Experiences of Completing a Student Selected Component. Creative Education, 10(2), 15. doi: 10.4236/ce.2019.102022.
  34. Pinto, S. (2018). Intercultural competence in higher education: academics' perspectives. On the Horizon, 26(2), 137-147. doi: 10.1108/OTH-02-2018-0011.
  35. Reeve, J. (2009). Understanding motivation and emotion (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  36. Rosi, M., Tuček, D., Potočan, V., & Jurše, M. (2018). Market Orientation of Business Schools: A Development Opportunity for the Business Model of University Business Schools in Transition Countries. Economics and Management (E & M), 21(4), 175-194.
  37. Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003) Key Competencies for a Successful Life and a Well-Functioning Society. Gottingen: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
  38. Sellar, S. (2013). Equity, markets and the politics of aspiration in Australian higher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 245-258.
  39. Slavík, M. et al. (2012). Vysokoškolská pedagogika (Higher Education Pedagogy). Prague: Grada.
  40. Tomlinson, M. (2018). Conceptions of the value of higher education in a measured market. Higher Education, 75, 711-727. doi: 1 0.1007/s10734-017-0165-6.
  41. Watts, R. (2017). Public Universities, Managerialism and the Value of Higher Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-53599-3.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2080-0150
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/joim-2019-0021
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu