BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Quan Rose (Northumbria University, Newcastle, Great Britain), Fan Mingyue (Jiangsu University, Jiangsu, China,), Zhang Michael (Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, Great Britain), Sun Huan (Northumbria University, Newcastle, Great Britain)
Tytuł
A Dynamic Dual Model : The Determinants of Transnational Migrant Entrepreneurs' Embeddedness in the UK
Źródło
Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation (JEMI), 2019, vol. 15, nr 2, s. 29-55, tab., wykr., bibliogr. s. 50-54
Tytuł własny numeru
Immigrant Entrepreneurship: New Research Trends and Challenges
Słowa kluczowe
Przedsiębiorczość międzynarodowa, Imigracja, Przedsiębiorca
International entrepreneurship, Immigration, Entrepreneur
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: F2
streszcz., summ.
Kraj/Region
Wielka Brytania
United Kingdom
Abstrakt
Skuteczne osadzenie w kraju przyjmującym jest ważną kwestią dla przedsiębiorców imigrantów i przedsiębiorców transnarodowych. Wcześniejsze badania z tego obszaru koncentrowały się głównie na lokalnym osadzeniu spółek międzynarodowych (MNCs). Do tej pory badano przedsiębiorstwa ponadnarodowe, i niewiele osób zajmowało się sposobem osadzenia w kraju przyjmującym przedsiębiorców transnarodowych. Opisane badanie oparte jest na 7 pogłębionych studiach przypadku małych, chińskich przedsiębiorstw międzynarodowych działających w Wielkiej Brytanii. Na podstawie analiz Autorzy stworzyli dynamiczny model podwójnego procesu, który składa się z 3 wymiarów: osadzenia strukturalnego; osadzenia instytucjonalnego; i osadzenia poznawczego. Wnioski z badania stanowią teoretyczny wkład, oferując wgląd w sposób, w jaki międzynarodowi przedsiębiorcy migrujący osadzają się w podwójnym, transgranicznym środowisku biznesowym. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Effective embeddedness in the host country is an important issue for immigrant and transnational entrepreneurs. However, prior research has mainly focused on subsidiaries' local embeddedness of multinational companies (MNCs). While a limited number of studies have examined transnational enterprises, few have explored how transnational entrepreneurs embed in the host country where they immigrate to. Employing 7 in-depth case studies of Chinese small transnational enterprises operating in the UK, we construct a dynamic dual process model which consists of 3 dimensions: structural embeddedness; institutional embeddedness; and cognitive embeddedness. Our findings make a theoretical contribution by offering insights into how transnational migrant entrepreneurs embed in a dual cross-border business environment. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Andersson, U., Björkman, I., & Forsgren, M. (2005). Managing subsidiary knowledge creation: The effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness. International Business Review, 14(5), 521-538.
  2. Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. (1996). Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation. International business review, 5(5), 487- 508.
  3. Bagwell, S. (2018). From mixed embeddedness to transnational mixed embeddedness: an exploration of Vietnamese businesses in London. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(1), 104-120.
  4. Bagwell, S. (2015). Transnational entrepreneurship amongst Vietnamese businesses in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(2), 329 -349.
  5. Bansal, P., & Corley, K. (2011). The coming of age for qualitative research: embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 233-237.
  6. Basch, L., Schiller, N. G., & Blanc, C. S. (1994). Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments and Deterritorialized Nation-States. Postfach: Gordon and Breach Publishers.
  7. Bruton, G. D., Khavul, S., & Chavez, H. (2011). Microlending in emerging economies: Building a new line of inquiry from the ground up. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 718-739.
  8. Bryman, A. (2003). Quantity and quality in social research. London: Routledge.
  9. Brzozowski, J., Cucculelli, M. & Surdej, A. (2017). The determinants of transnational entrepreneurship and transnational ties' dynamics among immigrant entrepreneurs in ICT sector in Italy. International Migration, 55(3), 105-125.
  10. Brzozowski, J., Cucculelli, M., & Surdej, A. (2014). Transnational ties and performance of immigrant entrepreneurs: the role of home-country conditions. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(7- 8), 546-573.
  11. Chen, W., & Tan, J. (2009). Understanding transnational entrepreneurship through a network lens: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1079-1091.
  12. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of business venturing, 18(3), 301- 331.
  13. Dimitratos, P., Buck, T., Fletcher, M., & Li, N. (2016). The motivation of international entrepreneurship: The case of Chinese transnational entrepreneurs. International business review, 25(5), 1103-1113.
  14. Drori, I., Honig, B., & Wright, M. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1001- 1022.
  15. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1), 25-32.
  16. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543-576.
  17. Elo, M., Sandberg, S., Servais, P., Basco, R., Cruz, A. D., Riddle, L., & Täube, F. (2018). Advancing the views on migrant and diaspora entrepreneurs in international entrepreneurship. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 119-133.
  18. Fontana, A. & Frey, J. (2004). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd Ed.). London: Sage, 645- 670.
  19. Forsgren, M., Holm, U. & Johanson, J. (1992). Internationalization of the second degree: the emergence of European- based centres in Swedish firms. In S. Young & J. Hamill (Eds.). Europe and the Multinationals. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  20. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American journal of sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
  21. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  22. Ibeh, K., & Kasem, L. (2011). The network perspective and the internationalization of small and medium sized software firms from Syria. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(3), 358-367.
  23. Jack, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 467- 487.
  24. Johnson, L., & Kimmelman, D. (2014). Migrant entrepreneurs: Building our businesses creating our jobs. A report by Centre for Entrepreneurs and DueDil.
  25. Johnstone, H., & Lionais, D. (2004). Depleted communities and community business entrepreneurship: revaluing space through place. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(3), 217-233.
  26. Katila, S., & Wahlbeck, Ö. (2012). The role of (transnational) social capital in the start-up processes of immigrant businesses: The case of Chinese and Turkish restaurant businesses in Finland. International Small Business Journal, 30(3), 294-309.
  27. Kenney, M., Breznitz, D., & Murphree, M. (2013). Coming back home after the sun rises: Returnee entrepreneurs and growth of high tech industries. Research Policy, 42(2), 391-407.
  28. Lan, T., & Zhu, S. (2014). Chinese apparel value chains in Europe: low-end fast fashion, regionalization, and transnational entrepreneurship in Prato, Italy. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 55(2), 156-174.
  29. Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Sage Publications.
  30. Ley, D. (2006). Explaining variations in business performance among immigrant entrepreneurs in Canada. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(5), 743-764.
  31. Light, I. (2007). Global entrepreneurship and transnationalism. In L. P. Dana (Ed.). Handbook of research on ethnic minority entrepreneurship: A co-evolutionary view on resource management. Edward Elgar Publishing, 3- 15.
  32. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. California: Sage Publications.
  33. Lin, X., & Tao, S. (2012). Transnational entrepreneurs: Characteristics, drivers, and success factors. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 10 (1), 50-69.
  34. Liu, X., Lu, J., Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Wright, M. (2010). Returnee entrepreneurs, knowledge spillovers and innovation in high-tech firms in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1183- 1197.
  35. Mainela, T., & Puhakka, V. (2008). Embeddedness and networking as drivers in developing an international joint venture. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(1), 17-32.
  36. Mainela, T., Puhakka, V., & Servais, P. (2014). The concept of international opportunity in international entrepreneurship: a review and a research agenda. International journal of management reviews, 16(1), 105-129.
  37. McDougall, P. P., & Oviatt, B. M. (2000). International entrepreneurship: the intersection of two research paths. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 902-906.
  38. McGrath, H., & O'Toole, T. (2014). A cross-cultural comparison of the network capability development of entrepreneurial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(6), 897-910.
  39. McKeever, E., Jack, S., & Anderson, A. (2015). Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 50-65.
  40. Meyer, K. E., & Nguyen, H. V. (2005). Foreign investment strategies and subnational institutions in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of management studies, 42(1), 63-93.
  41. Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. (2005). Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: Transactions, resources, and institutions. Journal of international business studies, 36(6), 600-621.
  42. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
  43. Mustafa, M., & Chen, S. (2010). The strength of family networks in transnational immigrant entrepreneurship. Thunderbird International Business Review, 52(2), 97-106.
  44. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
  45. Nell, P. C., Ambos, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2011). The MNC as an externally embedded organization: An investigation of embeddedness overlap in local subsidiary networks. Journal of World Business, 46(4), 497-505.
  46. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and Economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Pavlov, T., Predojević-Despić, J., & Milutinović, S. (2013). Transnational entrepreneurship: Experiences of migrant-returnees to Serbia. Sociologija, 55(2), 261-282.
  48. Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. (1996). The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of management review, 21(2), 492-528.
  49. Perren, L., & Ram, M. (2004). Case-study method in small business and entrepreneurial research: mapping boundaries and perspectives. International small business journal, 22(1), 83-101.
  50. Pratt, M. G. (2009). From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856-862.
  51. Pruthi, S. (2014). Social ties and venture creation by returnee entrepreneurs. International Business Review, 23(6), 1139-1152.
  52. Rath, J., & Kloosterman, R. (2000). Outsiders' business: a critical review of research on immigrant entrepreneurship. International migration review, 34(3), 657-681.
  53. Riddle, L., Hrivnak, G. A., & Nielsen, T. M. (2010). Transnational diaspora entrepreneurship in emerging markets: Bridging institutional divides. Journal of International Management, 16(4), 398- 411.
  54. Rizopoulos, Y. A., & Sergakis, D. E. (2010). MNEs and policy networks: Institutional embeddedness and strategic choice. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 250-256.
  55. Sabah, S., Carsrud, A. L., & Kocak, A. (2014). The impact of cultural openness, religion, and nationalism on entrepreneurial intensity: Six prototypical cases of Turkish family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 306-324.
  56. Saxenian, A. (2002). Transnational communities and the evolution of global production networks: the cases of Taiwan, China and India. Industry and innovation, 9(3), 183-202.
  57. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  58. Sequeira, J. M., Carr, J. C., & Rasheed, A. A. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurship: determinants of firm type and owner attributions of success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1023-1044.
  59. Urbano, D., Toledano, N., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2011). Socio- cultural factors and transnational entrepreneurship: A multiple case study in Spain. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 119-134.
  60. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35-67.
  61. Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American sociological review, 674-698.
  62. Wang, K. T., Li, F., Wang, Y., Hunt, E. N., Yan, G. C., & Currey, D. E. (2014). The international friendly campus scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 42, 118-128.
  63. Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship-conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165-184.
  64. Wickham, P. A. (2006). Strategic entrepreneurship (4th Ed.). Edinburgh: Pearson Education.
  65. Wong, L. L., & Ng, M. (2002). The emergence of small transnational enterprise in Vancouver: The case of Chinese entrepreneur immigrants. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3), 508-530.
  66. Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Deeds, D. L. (2008). What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies?. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 32(1), 59-82.
  67. Yeung, H. W. C. (2002). Entrepreneurship in international business: An institutional perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(1), 29-61.
  68. Yinger, J. M. (1985). Ethnicity. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 151-180.
  69. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  70. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 147-150.
  71. Zahra, S. A., Wright, M., & Abdelgawad, S. G. (2014). Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International small business journal, 32(5), 479-500.
  72. Zukin, S., & DiMaggio, P. (1990). Structures of capital: The social organization of the economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2299-7075
Język
eng
URI / DOI
https://doi.org/10.7341/20191522
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu