BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Vlados Charis (Democritus University of Thrace; University of Nicosia, Cyprus), Chatzinikolaou Dimos (Democritus University of Thrace)
Tytuł
Business Ecosystems Policy in Stra.Tech.Man Terms: The Case of the Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Region
Źródło
Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation (JEMI), 2019, vol. 15, nr 3, s. 163-197, tab., rys., bibliogr. s. 186-196
Tytuł własny numeru
Entrepreneurship, Technological Upgrading and Innovation Policy in Less Developed and Peripheral Regions
Słowa kluczowe
Przedsiębiorczość lokalna, Małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa, Globalizacja, Ekosystem biznesowy
Local entrepreneurship, Small business, Globalization, Business ecosystem
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: R58, L26, L50
streszcz., summ.
Kraj/Region
Macedonia, Grecja
Macedonia, Greece
Abstrakt
W obecnym stanie restrukturyzacji globalizacji liczne badania badają strategie na rzecz wzmocnienia lokalnej przedsiębiorczości i systemów produkcyjnych pod względem klastrów i ekosystemów. W tym artykule stosujemy i rozszerzamy podejście Stra.Tech.Man do dynamiki przedsiębiorczości jako alternatywnej podstawy formułowania polityki rozwoju ekosystemów biznesowych. Badając przypadek regionu Wschodniej Macedonii i Tracji, jednego z mniej rozwiniętych regionów w Grecji, stwierdzamy, że istnieją możliwości wykorzystania podejścia Stra.Tech.Man do nadruku, zapisu i, co za tym idzie, możliwości wzmocnienia strategicznego, technologicznego i zarządczego zdolności "komórek" określonych ekosystemów biznesowych. W tym kontekście celem niniejszego opracowania jest nakreślenie nowego możliwego kierunku planowania i wdrażania polityki, w celu rozszerzenia innowacyjnych i konkurencyjnych kompetencji lokalnych ekosystemów biznesowych, zwłaszcza w kontekście słabiej rozwiniętego regionu, dzięki wykorzystaniu mechanizm ILDI (Institutes of Local Development and Innovation). W tym kierunku przedstawiamy "wstępne" i jakościowe badania terenowe, które przeprowadziliśmy w regionie Wschodniej Macedonii i Tracji, na próbie MŚP, w kategoriach diagnostycznych fizjologii Stra.Tech.Man.(abstrakt oryginalny)

In the current state of globalization's restructuring, numerous studies are examining policies to strengthen local entrepreneurship and productive systems, in terms of clusters and ecosystems. In this article, we apply and extend the Stra.Tech.Man approach to entrepreneurial dynamics as an alternative base of articulating a business ecosystems development policy. By studying the case of the Eastern Macedonia and Thrace region, one of the less developed regions in Greece, we find that there are possibilities for using the Stra.Tech.Man approach to imprint, record and, by extension, give the possibility of strengthening the strategic, technological, and managerial capacity of the "cells" of specific business ecosystems. In this context, the aim of this study is to outline a new possible direction for policy planning and implementation, in order to expand the local business ecosystems' innovative and competitive competence, especially in the context of a less developed region, by the usage of the ILDI (Institutes of Local Development and Innovation) mechanism. In this direction, we present an "introductory" and qualitative field research we carried out in the region of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace, on a sample of SMEs, in diagnostic terms of Stra.Tech.Man physiology. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Acs, Z. J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & O'Connor, A. (2017). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8
  2. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. (2017). National systems of innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 997-1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9481-8
  3. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
  4. Aglietta, M. (2010). La Crise: Le Voies de Sortie (Nouv. éd). Paris: Michalon.
  5. Ahokangas, P., Boter, H., & Iivari, M. (2018). Ecosystems perspective on entrepreneurship. In R. V. Turcan & N. M. Fraser (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Entrepreneurship (pp. 387-407). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91611-8_18
  6. Akola, E., & Havupalo, N. (2013). Restructuring in SMEs: Finland. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  7. Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887-903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694
  8. Asheim, B. T., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Regional innovation systems: Past-present-future. In R. Shearmur, C. Carrincazeaux, & D. Doloreux, Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation (pp. 45-62). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710774.00010
  9. Autio, E., & Levie, J. (2017). Management of entrepreneurial ecosystems. In G. Ahmetoglu, T. Chamorro-Premuzic, B. Klinger, & T. Karcisky (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Entrepreneurship (pp. 423-449). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118970812.ch19
  10. Baldwin, C. Y. (2012). Organization design for business ecosystems. Journal of Organization Design, 1(1), 20-23. https://doi.org/10.7146/jod.6334
  11. Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
  12. Barff, R. A., & Iii, P. L. K. (1988). Dynamic shift-share analysis. Growth and Change, 19(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.1988.tb00465.x
  13. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31-56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
  14. Batterton, K. A., & Hale, K. N. (2017). The Likert scale what it is and how to use it. Phalanx, 50(2), 32-39.
  15. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318391
  16. Becattini, G. (1979). Dal settore industriale al distretto industriale. Alcune considerazioni sull'unità d'indagine dell'economia industriale. Rivista Di Economia e Politica Industriale, V(1), 7-21.
  17. Belussi, F., & Caldari, K. (2008). At the origin of the industrial district: Alfred Marshall and the Cambridge school. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(2), 335-355. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben041
  18. Ben Letaifa, S., Gratacap, A., Isckia, T., & Pesqueux, Y. (2013). Understanding Business Ecosystems: How Firms Succeed in the New World of Convergence? Bruxelles: De Boeck.
  19. Blackburn, R. A. (2016). Government, SMEs and Entrepreneurship Development: Policy, Practice and Challenges. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315585666
  20. Blakely, E. J., & Leigh, N. G. (2013). Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice (Fifth edition). Los Angeles: SAGE.
  21. Blondel, F., & Gratacap, A. (2016). Entrepreneur, dynamique d'innovation et écosystème d'affaires. Marché et organisations, 1(25), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.3917/maorg.025.0015
  22. Bosch, J., & Olsson, H. H. (2018). Ecosystem traps and where to find them. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 30(11), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1961
  23. Boudeville, J. R. (1974). Problems of Regional Economic Planning. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  24. Boyer, R. (2015). Économie Politique des Capitalismes: Théorie de la Régulation et des Crises. Paris: La Découverte. https://doi.org/10.4000/regulation.11923
  25. Camagni, R. (1995). Espace et temps dans le concept de milieu innovateur. In A. Rallet & A. Torre (eds.), Economie Industrielle et Economie Spatiale (pp. 192-210). Paris: Economica.
  26. Carroué, L. (2002). Géographie De La Mondialisation. Paris: Armand Colin.
  27. Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., & Balocco, R. (2018). Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Present debates and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0526-3
  28. Chang, J. F. (2016). Business Process Management Systems: Strategy and Implementation. New York: Auerbach Publications. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420031362
  29. Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2014). Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization (4th ed.). Los Angeles; London; New Delhi; Singapore; Washington DC: SAGE.
  30. Cooke, P., Clifton, N., & Oleaga, M. (2005). Social capital, firm embeddedness and regional development. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1065-1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400500328065
  31. Davis, H. C. (1990). Regional Economic Impact Analysis and Project Evaluation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
  32. Delapierre, M., Moati, P., & Mouhoud, E. M. (2000). Connaissance Et Mondialisation. Paris: Economica.
  33. Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (2018). Theory into practice, practice to theory: Action research in method development. European Journal of Operational Research, 271(3), 1145-1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.05.061
  34. Elinkeinoelämän keskusliitto. (2018, January 3). EK:n yrityskysely: Lähes 60 % vientiyrityksistä tarvitsee ja 26 % käyttää Team Finlandin palveluita. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://ek.fi/ajankohtaista/tiedotteet/2018/01/03/ekn-yrityskysely-lahes-60-vientiyrityksista-tarvitsee-ja-26-kayttaa-team-finlandin-palveluita/
  35. Etzkowitz, H. & Zhou, C. (2017). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620183
  36. Eurofound. (2013). Restructuring in SMEs in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  37. European Commission (2018) SBA Fact Sheet Greece. Retrieved March 7, 2019, from https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/32581/attachments/13/translations/en/renditions/native
  38. European Monitoring Centre on Change. (2018a, July 22). Poles of competitiveness | Eurofound [Restructuring Support Instruments]. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/emcc/erm/support-instrument/poles-of-competitiveness
  39. European Monitoring Centre on Change. (2018b, August 7). Public Investment Bank | Eurofound [Restructuring Support Instruments]. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/emcc/erm/support-instrument/public-investment-bank
  40. European Monitoring Centre on Change. (2018c, August 7). Team Finland - Services supporting the internationalisation of busi... | Eurofound [Restructuring Support Instruments]. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/emcc/erm/support-instrument/team-finland-services-supporting-the-internationalisation-of-busi
  41. European Monitoring Centre on Change. (2018d, September 18). Innovation Norway | Eurofound [Restructuring Support Instruments]. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/emcc/erm/support-instrument/innovation-norway
  42. European Monitoring Centre on Change. (2018e, September 26). Enterprise Ireland | Eurofound [Restructuring Support Instruments]. Retrieved October 11, 2018, from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/emcc/erm/support-instrument/enterprise-ireland
  43. European Monitoring Centre on Change. (2018f, September 26). Local Enterprise Offices (LEOs) | Eurofound [Restructuring Support Instruments]. Retrieved October 11, 2018, from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/emcc/erm/support-instrument/local-enterprise-offices-leos
  44. European Monitoring Centre on Change. (2018g, October 2). Enterprise Ireland Mentor Network | Eurofound [Restructuring Support Instruments]. Retrieved October 11, 2018, from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/emcc/erm/support-instrument/enterprise-ireland-mentor-network
  45. Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation-the concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief, 9(85), 1-5.
  46. Forrester, J. W. (1984). Principes des Systèmes. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
  47. Frederickson, H. G. (2016). The Adapted City: Institutional Dynamics and Structural Change: Institutional Dynamics and Structural Change. London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315290171
  48. Harpe, S. E. (2015). How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(6), 836-850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001
  49. Gancarczyk, M., & Bohatkiewicz, J. (2018). Research streams in cluster upgrading: A literature review. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 14(4), 17-42. https://doi.org/10.7341/20181441
  50. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674281653
  51. Geus, A. de. (2002). The Living Company. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
  52. Golejewska, A. (2018). Innovativeness of enterprises in Poland in the regional context. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 14(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.7341/20181412
  53. Gowdy, J. (1997). Introduction: Biology and economics. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8(4), 377-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(97)00021-0
  54. Haddad, E. A. (2018). Regional Inequality and Structural Changes: Lessons from the Brazilian Experience. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429449406
  55. Hammerstein, P., & Hagen, E. H. (2005). The second wave of evolutionary economics in biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(11), 604-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.012
  56. Hanusch, H., & Pyka, A. (2007). Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847207012
  57. Hardouvelis, G. A., & Gkionis, I. (2016). A decade long economic crisis: Cyprus versus Greece. Cyprus Economic Policy Review, 10(2), 3-40.
  58. Harlé, E., & Jouanneault, J.-D. (1983). L'Entreprise en Tant que Système. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
  59. Hirsch, J., & Roth, R. (1986). Das neue Gesicht des Kapitalismus: Vom Fordismus zum Post-Fordismus. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.
  60. Holloway, J. (1988). The great bear, post-fordism and class struggle: A comment on Bonefeld and Jessop. Capital & Class, 12(3), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981688803600105
  61. Hurley, J., & Storrie, D. W. (2017). Globalisation Slowdown? Recent Evidence of Offshoring and Reshoring in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  62. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2002). The new operational dynamics of business ecosystems: Implications for policy, operations and technology strategy. Harvard Business School Working Paper, (03-030).
  63. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
  64. Innovasjon Norge (2017). Annual Report 2017. Retrieved March 7, 2019, from https://arsrapport.innovasjonnorge.no/en/arsrapport-2017-eng/
  65. Ioannides, Y. M., & Pissarides, C. A. (2015). Is the Greek crisis one of supply or demand? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2015(2), 349-373. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2015.0004
  66. Isaksen, A., Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2018). Innovation policies for regional structural change: Combining actor-based and system-based strategies. In A. Isaksen, R. Martin, & M. Trippl (Eds.), New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems - Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons (pp. 221-238). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_11
  67. Isckia, T., & Lescop, D. (2009). Open innovation within business ecosystems: A tale from amazon.com, Communications & Strategies, (74), 37-54.
  68. Isenberg, D. (2010). The big idea: How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40-50.
  69. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255-2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
  70. Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2016). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. In B-Å. Lundvall, The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope (Vol. 155, pp. 155-182). London: Anthem Press.
  71. Jessop, B. (1988). Regulation theory, post fordism and the state: More than a reply to Werner Bonefield. Capital & Class, 12(1), 147-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981688803400110
  72. Johnson, B. (2001). Toward a new classification of nonexperimental quantitative research. Educational Researcher, 30(2), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030002003
  73. Katimertzopoulos, F., & Vlados, C. (2017). Local support mechanisms for entrepreneurship: The approach of local development and innovation institutions. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 10(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.25103/ijbesar.101.04
  74. Kennedy, E. B., Miller, D. J., & Niewiarowski, P. H. (2018). Industrial and biological analogies used creatively by business professionals. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1411631
  75. Ketels, C. (2011). Clusters and competitiveness: Porter's contribution. In R. Huggins & H. Izushi, Competition, Competitive Advantage, and Clusters: The Ideas of Michael Porter (pp. 173-192). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199578030.003.0010
  76. Kim, S.-T. (2015). Regional advantage of cluster development: A case study of the San Diego biotechnology cluster. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 238-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.861807
  77. Korhonen, J. (2001). Four ecosystem principles for an industrial ecosystem. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(3), 253-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00058-5
  78. Kurtz, C. (2018). Are we ready for complexity? Journal on Policy and Complex Systems, 4(1), 135-154. https://doi.org/10.18278/jpcs.4.1.7
  79. Laudicina, P. A., & Peterson, E. R. (2016). From Globalization to Islandization (Global Business Policy Council (GBPC) /Research Report) (p. 26). ATKearney. Retrieved March 3, 2019, from https://www.atkearney.com/web/global-business-policy-council/article?/a/from-globalization-to-islandization
  80. Lazzeretti, L., Sedita, S. R., & Caloffi, A. (2014). Founders and disseminators of cluster research. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs053
  81. Lesourne, J. (1976). Les Systèmes du Destin. Paris: Dalloz.
  82. Li, Y. R. (2014). The cluster policies to nation competitiveness based on business ecosystem perspective - Case study of Taiwanese smart phone industry. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 887-891). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2014.7058766
  83. Liguori, E., Winkler, C., Hechavarria, D., & Lange, J. (2018). Guest editorial. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 12(2), 86-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-02-2018-0017
  84. Liu, G., & Rong, K. (2015). The nature of the co-evolutionary process: Complex product development in the mobile computing industry's business ecosystem. Group & Organization Management, 40(6), 809-842. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115593830
  85. Local Enterprise Offices. (2018). About US | Services. Retrieved October 11, 2018, from https://www.localenterprise.ie/About-Us/Services/
  86. Mack, E., & Mayer, H. (2016). The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118-2133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586547
  87. Majava, J., Rinkinen, S., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2016). Development of San Diego life sciences ecosystem. In Finnish policy research seminar: Growth ecosystems as an innovation policy tool. The Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment of Finland.
  88. Malecki, E. J. (2018). Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass, 12(3), e12359. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12359
  89. Maroufkhani, P., Wagner, R., & Wan Ismail, W. K. (2018). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic review. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 12(2), 158-177. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2017-0025
  90. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics (8th Edition, published in 1920). London: Macmillan.
  91. Mason, C., & Brown, D. R. (2014). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship (p. 38). The Hauge, Netherlands: OECD.
  92. McMullen, J. S. (2018). Organizational hybrids as biological hybrids: Insights for research on the relationship between social enterprise and the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 575-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.06.001
  93. Meier zu Köcker, G., & Müller, L. (2015). Cluster Programmes in Europe (European Cluster Observatory) (p. 35).
  94. Meyer, C., & Davis, S. M. (2003). It's Alive: The Coming Convergence of Information, Biology, and Business. New York: Crown Business.
  95. Moore, J. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86.
  96. Moore, J. (2013). Shared Purpose: A Thousand Business Ecosystems, A Connected Community, and the Future. Mountain view: Create space publishing platform.
  97. Nathan, M., & Overman, H. (2013). Agglomeration, clusters, and industrial policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 29(2), 383-404. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grt019
  98. Neergaard, H., & Ulhøi, J. P. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847204387
  99. Neffke, F., Hartog, M., Boschma, R., & Henning, M. (2018). Agents of structural change: The role of firms and entrepreneurs in regional diversification. Economic Geography, 94(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1391691
  100. Obadić, A. (2013). Specificities of EU cluster policies. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 7(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506201311315581
  101. Parisot, X. (2013). Metaphor in organizational theory, the business ecosystem case. In Volume 22th AIMS International Conference. Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  102. Penrose, E. T. (1952). Biological analogies in the theory of the firm. The American Economic Review, 42(5), 804-819.
  103. Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2017). Shifting horizons in local and regional development. Regional Studies, 51(1), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1158802
  104. Piperopoulos, P. G. (2016). Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Business Clusters. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315579948
  105. Pitelis, C. (2012). Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: A conceptual framework. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(6), 1359-1388. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts008
  106. Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77-90.
  107. Porter, M. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240001400105
  108. Porter, M., & Ketels, C. (2009). Clusters and industrial districts: Common roots, different perspectives. In G. Becattini, M. Bellandi, & L. De Propris (eds.), A Handbook of Industrial Districts (pp. 172-183). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  109. Rapanos, V. T., & Kaplanoglou, G. (2014). Governance, growth and the recent economic crisis: The case of Greece and Cyprus. Cyprus Economic Policy Review, 8(1), 3-34.
  110. Reeves, M., Levin, S., & Ueda, D. (2016). The biology of corporate survival. Harvard Business Review, 94(1), 2.
  111. Rinkinen, S., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2018). The business ecosystem concept in innovation policy context: Building a conceptual framework. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 31(3), 333-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1300089
  112. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034-1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
  113. Rong, K., Lin, Y., Li, B., Burström, T., Butel, L., & Yu, J. (2018). Business ecosystem research agenda: More dynamic, more embedded, and more internationalized. Asian Business & Management, 17(3), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-018-0038-6
  114. Rosemann, M., & vom Brocke, J. (2015). The six core elements of business process management. In J. vom Brocke & M. Rosemann (Eds.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1: Introduction, Methods, and Information Systems (pp. 105-122). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45100-3_5
  115. Rosier, B. (1985). Croissance et Crise Capitalistes (2nd edition). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France - PUF.
  116. Rothschild, M. (1990). Bionomics: The Inevitability of Capitalism. New York: H. Holt.
  117. Roundy, P. T., & Asllani, A. (2018). The themes of entrepreneurship discourse: A data analytics approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 14(3), 127-158. https://doi.org/10.7341/20181436
  118. Sako, M. (2018). Business ecosystems: How do they matter for innovation? Communications of the ACM, 61(4), 20-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3185780
  119. Sayer, A. (1989). Postfordism in question. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 13(4), 666-695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1989.tb00141.x
  120. Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2016). Business models for sustainability: A co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(3), 264-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616633272
  121. Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  122. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York; London: Harper & Brothers.
  123. Scott, A., & Paul, A. S. (1990). Collective order and economic coordination in industrial agglomerations: The technopoles of southern California. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 8(2), 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1068/c080179
  124. Scott, A., & Storper, M. (2003). Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies, 37(6-7), 579-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108697a
  125. Shields, P. M., & Rangarajan, N. (2013). A Playbook for Research Methods: Integrating Conceptual Frameworks and Project Management. Stillwater, OK: New Forum Press.
  126. Simatupang, T. M., Schwab, A., & Lantu, D. C. (2015). Building sustainable entrepreneurship ecosystems, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 26(4), 389-398. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3161598
  127. Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984249
  128. Storey, D. J. (2016). Entrepreneurship and New Firm: Theory and Policy. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315544502
  129. Storper, M., & Scott, A. (1989). The geographical foundations and social regulation of flexible production complexes. In J. Wolch, The Power of Geography (RLE Social & Cultural Geography): How Territory Shapes Social Life. London; New York: Routledge.
  130. Stuck, J., Broekel, T., & Diez, J. R. (2016). Network structures in regional innovation systems. European Planning Studies, 24(3), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1074984
  131. Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2010). From regional systems of innovation to regions as innovation policy spaces. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(4), 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0961
  132. Valkokari, K. (2015). Business, innovation, and knowledge ecosystems: How they differ and how to survive and thrive within them. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(8), 17-24.
  133. Valkokari, K., & Ketonen-Oksi, S. (2018). Understanding platforms and ecosystems as structures for value co-creation (p. 14). Presented at the ISPIM Innovation Conference - Innovation, The Name of The Game, Stockholm, Sweden. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/919
  134. Veltz, P. (2014). Mondialisation, Villes Et Territoires: L'économie D'archipel (2nd edition). Paris: PUF. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.velt.2014.01
  135. Vlados, C. (2004). La Dynamique du Triangle Stratégie, Technologie et Managemen : l'Insertion des Entreprises Grecques dans la Globalisation. Thèse. Paris 10.
  136. Vlados, C. (2005). The insertion of Greek firms into globalization: The dynamics of the triangle of strategy, technology and management. In Managing Global Trends and Challenges in a Turbulent Economy, University of the Aegean, Department of Business Administration. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3218009
  137. Vlados, C. (2012). The search of competitiveness and the entrepreneurial evolution in a global environment: Toward a new approach of development dynamics based on the case of Greek productive system. Journal of Management Sciences and Regional Development, (8), 91-116. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3218008
  138. Vlados, C., Deniozos, N., & Chatzinikolaou, D. (2018). Towards a new approach of local development under crisis conditions: Empowering the local business ecosystems in Greece, by adopting a new local development policy. International Journal of Regional Development, 5(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijrd.v5i1.11955
  139. Vlados, C., Deniozos, N., Chatzinikolaou, D., & Demertzis, M. (2018). Towards an evolutionary understanding of the current global socio-economic crisis and eestructuring: From a conjunctural to a structural and evolutionary perspective. Research in World Economy, 9(1), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.5430/rwe.v9n1p15
  140. Weber, M., & Hine, M. (2015). Who inhabits a business ecosystem? The technospecies as a unifying concept. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(5), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/896
  141. Wei, Y. D. (2015). Spatiality of regional inequality. Applied Geography, 61, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.03.013
  142. Williamson, P. J., & Meyer, A. D. (2012). Ecosystem advantage: How to successfully harness the power of partners. California Management Review, 55(1), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2012.55.1.24
  143. Witt, U. (2006). Evolutionary concepts in economics and biology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16(5), 473-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-006-0034-4
  144. Wulf, A., & Butel, L. (2017). Knowledge sharing and collaborative relationships in business ecosystems and networks: A definition and a demarcation. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(7), 1407-1425. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2016-0408
  145. Zahra, S. A., & Nambisan, S. (2012). Entrepreneurship and strategic thinking in business ecosystems. Business Horizons, 55(3), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.12.004
  146. Βλάδος, Χ. Μ. (2006). Η Δυναμική της Παγκοσμιοποίησης και οι Επιχειρήσεις στην Ελλάδα. Αθήνα: Εκδόσεις Κριτική.
  147. Τσακανίκας, Ά., Γιωτόπουλος, Ι., Σταυράκη, Σ., & Βαλαβανιώτη, Ε. (2017). Ετήσια Έκθεση Επιχειρηματικότητας 2016-2017: Σε κάμψη η νέα επιχειρηματικότητα (GEM Greece 2016-17 Report: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor). Athens: Foundation for Economic & Industrial Research.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2299-7075
Język
eng
URI / DOI
https://doi.org/10.7341/20191536
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu