BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Geiger Rudolf (University of Leipzig)
Tytuł
Taking Decisions on Customary International Law by the International Court of Justice in the Case Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy; Greece Intervening), 2012
Źródło
Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, 2018, vol. 8, nr 2, s. 233-243, bibliogr. 8 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Sądy międzynarodowe, Państwo, Prawo
International courts, State, Law
Uwagi
summ.
Kraj/Region
Niemcy, Włochy
Germany, Italy
Abstrakt
In spite of an ever increasing amount of bilateral and multilateral treaties covering the relationships between States it is also customary international law which still provides rules serving as the basis for judgments and opinions of the International Court of Justice. In such cases the Court frequently defines the concept of customary law by citing Article 38 (i) (b) of its Statute and explains the way it should be applied to find a specific norm applicable in the case before it. However, it may also be argued, that the Court has expressly proclaimed standards for establishing specific rules of customary law are rather frequently quite different from the manner in which the Court really proceeds. The present article comments on the Court's judgment of 3 February 2012 on 'Jurisdictional Immunities of the State', in which its decision was also based on customary international law. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Geiger R., Customary International Law in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice: A Critical Appraisal, in U. Fastenrath et al (eds), From Bilateralism to Community Interest. Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma (2011) 673.
  2. Geiger R., Die zweite Krise der volkerrechtlichen Rechtsquellenlehre, (1970) 30 "Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht" 215.
  3. Geiger R., Zur Lehre vom Vólkergewohnheitsrecht in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (1978) 103 "Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts" 382.
  4. Kirchner J., Volkergewohnheitsrecht aus der Sicht der Rechtsanwendung (1989).
  5. Roberts A., Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation, (2001) 95 "American Journal of International Law" 757.
  6. Talmon S., Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ's Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion, (2015) 26(2) "European Journal of International Law" 417.
  7. Tams Ch., Meta-Custom and the Court: A Study in Judicial Law- Making, (2015) 14 "The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals" 51.
  8. Wolfke K. Some Persistent Controversies Regarding Customary International Law, (1993) XXIV Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 1.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2084-1264
Język
eng
URI / DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0044
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu