BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Bajerski Artur (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland)
Tytuł
Geography of Research on Post-Socialist Cities: a Bibliometric Approach
Źródło
Urban Development Issues, 2020, vol. 65, s. 5-16, rys., tab., bibliogr. 35 poz.
Problemy Rozwoju Miast
Słowa kluczowe
Społeczeństwo postsocjalistyczne, Rozwój miasta, Analiza bibliometryczna, Badania naukowe
Post-communist society, City development, Bibliometric analysis, Scientific research
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
The main aim of the article is to investigate the spatial structure of international research on post-socialist cities. The analysis is based on data derived from the Scopus database (2001-2018) and includes issues such as the publication dynamics, structure of authors (with regard to cities and countries), main publishing 'channels', as well as networks in 'producing' knowledge on post-socialist cities. The analyses conducted primarily lead to a general conclusion about the high spatial concentration of these studies in the scientific centres of Central and Eastern Europe. On a more detailed dimension, however, analyses show a significant diversity in both the publication channels used by researchers and the co-citation networks. On this basis, a conclusion is made about the occurrence of the problem of introversions in research on post-socialist cities on an international scale, which is a broader concept than the Anglo-American dominance discussed for at least two decades. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka SGH im. Profesora Andrzeja Grodka
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Aalbers, M.B. (2004) Creative destruction through the Anglo-American hegemony: a non-Anglo-American view on publications, referees and language, Area, 36(3), 319-322.
  2. Aalbers, M.B. & Rossi, U. (2009) Anglo-American/Anglophone hegemony, [in:] R. Kitchin, N. Thrift, eds., International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Elsevier, New York, 1, 116-121.
  3. Bajerski, A. & Siwek, T. (2012) Bibliometricka analyza ieskegeografie v databazi Scopus, Geografie, 117(1), 52-71 [in Czech].
  4. Bajerski, A. & Przygoński, K. (2018) East-Central European human geographers in English-dominated, Anglophone-based international publishing space, Geographia Polonica, 91(3), 265-280.
  5. Bański, J. & Ferenc, M. (2013) 'International' or 'Anglo-American' journals of geography?, Geoforum, 45, 285-295.
  6. Bodman, A.R. (2009) Measuring the influentialness of economic geographers during the 'great half century': an approach using the h index, Journal of Economic Geography, 10(1), 141-156.
  7. Campbell, F.M. (1990) National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 78(4), 376.
  8. Foster, J., Muellerleile, C., Olds, K. & Peck, J. (2007) Circulating economic geographies: citation patterns and citation behaviour in economic geography, 1982-2006, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(3), 295-312.
  9. French, R.A. & Hamilton, F.I., eds., (1979) The socialist city: Spatial structure and urban policy, John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Fu, Y. & Zhang, X. (2017) Trajectory of urban sustainability concepts: A 35-year bibliometric analysis, Cities, 60, 113-123.
  11. Garcia-Ramon, M.D. (2003) Globalization and international geography: the questions of languages and scholarly traditions, Progress in Human Geography, 27(1), 1-5.
  12. Garcia-Ramon, M.D. (2004) The spaces of critical geography: an introduction, Geoforum, 5(35), 523-524.
  13. Gentile, M. & Sjoberg, O. (2020) Neoliberalism(s) as a Guide to PostWall Urban Change: Explanation Out of the Blue?, Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 111(2), 149-62.
  14. Grange, R.I. (1999) National bias in citations in urology journals: parochialism or availability?, BJU International, 84(6), 601-603.
  15. Gutierrez, J. & Lopez-Nieva, P. (2001) Are international journals of human geography really international?, Progress in Human Geography, 25(1), 53-69.
  16. Harzing, A.W. & Alakangas, S. (2016) Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison, Scientometrics, 106(2), 787-804.
  17. Hirt, S. Ferencuhova, S. & Tuvikene, T. (2016) Conceptual forum: The 'post-socialist' city, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57(45), 497-520.
  18. Horton, F.E. & Reynolds, D.R. (1971) Effects of urban spatial structure on individual behavior, Economic Geography, 47(1), 36-48.
  19. Kamalski, J. & Kirby, A. (2012) Bibliometrics and urban knowledge transfer, Cities, 29, S3-S8.
  20. Kanai, J.M., Grant, R. & Jianu, R. (2018) Cities on and off the map: A bibliometric assessment of urban globalisation research, Urban Studies, 55(12), 2569-2585.
  21. Kong, L. & Qian, J. (2019) Knowledge circulation in urban geography/ urban studies, 1990-2010: Testing the discourse of Anglo-American hegemony through publication and citation patterns, Urban Studies, 56(1), 44-80.
  22. Martin-Martin, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M. & López-Cózar, E.D. (2018) Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories, Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160-1177.
  23. Matthiessen, C.W. & Winkel Schwarz, A. (1999) Scientific centres in Europe: an analysis of research strength and patterns of specialisation based on bibliometric indicators, Urban Studies, 36(3), 453-477.
  24. Matthiessen, C.W., Schwarz, A.W. & Find, S. (2010) World cities of scientific knowledge: Systems, networks and potential dynamics. An analysis based on bibliometric indicators, Urban Studies, 47(9), 1879-1897.
  25. Minca, C. (2000) Venetian geographical praxis, Environment and Planning D, 18(3), 285-289.
  26. Mongeon, P. & Paul-Hus, A. (2016) The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis, Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228.
  27. Mora, L., Bolici, R. & Deakin, M. (2017) The first two decades of smart-city research: A bibliometric analysis, Journal of Urban Technology, 24(1), 3-27.
  28. Naughton, B. (2017) Is China Socialist?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 3-24.
  29. Pu, B. & Qiu, Y. (2016) Emerging trends and new developments on urban resilience: A bibliometric perspective, Current Urban Studies, 4(1), 36-52.
  30. Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2006) Is there an Anglo-American domination in human geography? And, is it bad?, Environment and Planning A, 38(4), 603-610.
  31. Simonsen, K. (2004) Differential spaces of critical geography, Geoforum, 35(5), 525-528.
  32. Short, J.R., Boniche, A., Kim, Y. & Li, P.L. (2001) Cultural globalization, global English, and geography journals, The Professional Geog-rapher, 53(1), 1-11.
  33. Stenning, A. & Horschelmann, K. (2008) History, geography and difference in the post-socialist world: or, do we still need post-socialism?, Antipode, 40(2), 312-335.
  34. Wu, F., Geng, Y., Tian, X., Zhong, S., Wu, W., Yu, S. & Xiao, S. (2018) Responding climate change: A bibliometric review on urban environ-mental governance, Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 344-354.
  35. Zeng, C., Liu, Y., Liu, Y. & Qiu, L. (2014) Urban sprawl and related problems: Bibliometric analysis and refined analysis from 1991 to 2011, Chinese Geographical Science, 24(2), 245-257.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1733-2435
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/udi-2020-0001
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu