BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Mohamed Zulkifli (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kelantan, Malaysia), Nadzri Farah Aida Ahmad (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia), Qureshi Shahzadah Fahed (Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan), Saad Al-Dhubaib Ahmed Abdullah (Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia), Arifin Johan (Universitas Islam Indonesia), Yacob Nathrah (Inti International College Subang)
Tytuł
A Panel Data Analysis of the Roles of Education Level and Financial Capacity on E-government Adoption for Higher Transparency and Efficiency in ASEAN Countries
Źródło
Contemporary Economics, 2020, vol. 14, nr 4, s. 532-541, rys., tab., bibliogr. 37 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
e-administracja, Inwestycje zagraniczne, Inwestycje bezpośrednie
e-government, Foreign investment, Direct investments
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: F38, H5
summ.
Kraj/Region
Kraje ASEAN
ASEAN countries
Abstrakt
E-government involves the application of the latest innovations while providing the provision of efficient services in the government's management systems. Whereas, ease of doing business is an index by World Bank that shows the easiness of doing business in particular country. These two variables are investigated in our study as they may contribute to the inflows of Foreign Direct Investment in the economy. Additionally, the study also includes two control variables which are the contribution of private industry and public industry in the GDP. Prior studies related to the topic are discussed in this study to develop various hypotheses. To conduct effective research, 26-years of data from the ASEAN countries were collected. After applying various approaches and techniques including panel co-integration test and DOLS estimation for testing different variables and their respective data, first major hypothesis of the study related to the e-government was rejected. Yet, another hypothesis emerged, regarding the impact of control variables such as contribution of private sector in GDP and contribution of public sector in GDP. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Abu-Shanab, E. A. (2017). E-government familiarity influence on Jordanians' perceptions. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.001
  2. Al-Hujran, O., Al-Debei, M. M., Chatfield, A., & Migdadi, M. (2015). The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.025
  3. Alam, M. B. (2017). E-government in India. In M. Sabharwal, & E. M. Berman (Eds.) Public administration in South Asia (pp. 173-192). Routledge.
  4. Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016). Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 161-173.
  5. Banerjee, P., & Chau, P. Y. (2004). An evaluative framework for analysing e-government convergence capability in developing countries. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 1(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2004.004135
  6. Bishop, G. (2016). A rule of reason for inward FDI: Integrating Canadian foreign investment review and competition policy. SPP Research Paper, 9(34), 1-30.
  7. Bilan, Y., Hussain, H. I., Haseeb, M., & Kot, S. (2020). Sustainability and Economic Performance: Role of Organizational Learning and Innovation. Engineering Economics, 31(1), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.31.1.24045
  8. Boateng, A., Hua, X., Nisar, S., & Wu, J. (2015). Examining the determinants of inward FDI: Evidence from Norway. Economic Modelling, 47, 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.02.018
  9. Buffat, A. (2015). Street-level bureaucracy and egovernment. Public Management Review, 17(1), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.771699
  10. Canare, T., Ang, A., & Mendoza, R. U. (2016). Ease of doing business: International policy experience and evidence. SSRN Working Paper, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2834757
  11. Corcoran, A., & Gillanders, R. (2015). Foreign direct investment and the ease of doing business. Review of World Economics, 151(1), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-014-0194-5
  12. Doshi, R., Kelley, J. G., & Simmons, B. A. (2019). The power of ranking: The ease of doing business indicator and global regulatory behavior. International Organization, 73(3), 611-643. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000158
  13. Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (1999). India: Economic development and social opportunity. Oxford University Press.
  14. Garcia, C., & Hinayon, D. (2018). Components of ease of doing business inferred from macroeconomic performance indicators. Journal of Educational and Human Resource Development, 6, 161-171.
  15. Gaur, A. (2017). Ease of doing business in India: Challenges & road ahead [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Technology and Business Management, Dubai, India.
  16. Güler, M., Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2019). Analysis of e-government strategies with hesitant fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria decision making techniques. In C. Kahraman, S. Cebi, S. C. Onar, B. Oztaysi, A. C. Tolga, & I. U. Sari (Eds.), International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (pp. 1068-1075). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23756-1_126
  17. Hurtado, J. M. (2018). Country patterns and effects on the ease of doing business and competitiveness: a global study. International Journal of Competitiveness, 1(3), 206-220. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJC.2018.091478
  18. Hussain, H.I., Kamarudin, F., Mohamad Anwar, N.A., Nassir, A.M., Sufian, F., Mang Tan, K. (2020). Impact of country's governance dimensions on bank revenue efficiency: Overview on Middle East, Southeast Asia, and South Asia countries. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19(1), 191-228.
  19. Jayasuriya, D. (2011). Improvements in the world bank's ease of doing business rankings: Do they translate into greater foreign direct investment inflows?. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5787
  20. Khan, F., & Majeed, M. (2019). ICT and e-Government as the sources of economic growth in information age: Empirical evidence from South Asian economies. South Asian Studies, 34(1), 227-249.
  21. Kottaridi, C., Louloudi, K., & Karkalakos, S. (2019). Human capital, skills and competencies: Varying effects on inward FDI in the EU context. International Business Review, 28(2), 375-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.10.008
  22. Kurfalı, M., Arifoğlu, A., Tokdemir, G., & Paçin, Y. (2017). Adoption of e-government services in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.041
  23. Lee, I. H. I., Hong, E., & Makino, S. (2016). Location decisions of inward FDI in sub-national regions of a host country: Service versus manufacturing industries. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(2), 343-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9456-6
  24. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & management, 40(3), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
  25. Martins, J., & Veiga, L. (2018, April). Electronic government and the ease of doing business. In A. Kankanhalli, A. Ojo, D. Soares (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 584-587). ACM.
  26. Milner, H. V., Tingley, D., Xu, C., & Chilton, A. (2019). The political economy of inward FDI: Opposition to Chinese mergers and acquisitions. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pou049
  27. Moran, T.H. (2012). Foreign Direct Investment and Development. In G. Ritzer (Ed.),The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog217
  28. Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 61(S1), 653-670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653
  29. Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4), 727-731. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465301753237803
  30. Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric theory, 20(3), 597-625.
  31. Sá, F., Rocha, Á., & Cota, M. P. (2016). Potential dimensions for a local e-Government services quality model. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 270-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.005
  32. Schnoll, H. J. (2015). E-government: Information, technology, and transformation:. Routledge.
  33. Tan, K. G., Gopalan, S., & Nguyen, W. (2018). Measuring ease of doing business in India's subnational economies: a novel index. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 7(3), 242-264.
  34. Tingley, D., Xu, C., Chilton, A., & Milner, H. V. (2015). The political economy of inward FDI: opposition to Chinese mergers and acquisitions. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 8(1), 27-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pou049
  35. Uddin, M., Chowdhury, A., Zafar, S., Shafique, S., & Liu, J. (2019). Institutional determinants of inward FDI: Evidence from Pakistan. International Business Review, 28(2), 344-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.10.006
  36. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  37. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., Chan, F. K., & Hu, P. J. (2016). Managing citizens' uncertainty in e-government services: The mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust. Information Systems Research, 27(1), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0612
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2084-0845
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.424
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu