BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Dovgal Olena (V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Kharkiv, Ukraine), Goncharenko Nataliia (V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine), Reshetnyak Olena (V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine), Dovgal Georgiy (V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine), Danko Natalia (V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine)
Tytuł
Priorities for Greening and the Sustainable Development of OECD Member Countries and Ukraine : a Comparative Analysis
Priorytety ekologizacji i zrównoważonego rozwoju krajów członkowskich OECD i Ukrainy : analiza porównawcza
Źródło
Comparative Economic Research, 2021, vol. 24, nr 1, s. 45-63, rys., tab., bibliogr. 48 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Degradacja środowiska, Ekologia, Rozwój zrównoważony
Degradation of the environment, Ecology, Sustainable development
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: F55, O13, O44, O57, P51, Q56
summ., streszcz.
Abstrakt
Artykuł koncentruje się na określeniu priorytetowych obszarów ekologizacji i zrównoważonego rozwoju dla krajów OECD i Ukrainy, mających na celu osiągnięcie ogólnego postępu w interakcji między gospodarką a środowiskiem, a także stworzenie koniecznych warunków wstępnych do wspierania innowacji i inwestycji w celu znalezienia nowych źródeł wzrostu gospodarczego, zgodnych z ekosystemami wykazującymi zdolność regeneracji. Udowodniono, że chociaż globalne cele gospodarki ekologicznej są istotne dla wszystkich krajów świata, muszą być dostosowane do specyfiki regionalnej i krajowej, a także do poziomu rozwoju gospodarczego każdego kraju. W badaniu wykorzystano ogólne jakościowe i ilościowe metody badań ekonomicznych, w tym analizę systematyczną, porównawczą, metody analizy logicznej i statystycznej, metodę wskaźnikową i inne. Zastosowane podejście teoretyczne i metodologiczne pozwoliło zidentyfikować ogólne trendy rozwoju czynników środowiskowych w krajach OECD i na Ukrainie oraz ich wpływ na wzrost gospodarczy. W badaniu przeanalizowano w szczególności obecny stan i perspektywy ekologizacji i zrównoważonego rozwoju w krajach OECD i na Ukrainie w oparciu o wyniki kompleksowej oceny poziomu ekologizacji tych gospodarek oraz relacji między wewnętrznym środowiskiem ekologicznym - ocenianym za pomocą wskaźników "zielonego wzrostu" - a ich rozwojem gospodarczym. Artykuł uzasadnia również wprowadzenie priorytetów w zakresie ekologizacji i zrównoważonego rozwoju, a także sugeruje praktyczne środki ich realizacji. Mogą one służyć jako podstawa do opracowania polityki skutecznego zarządzania środowiskiem i opracowania krajowego systemu zarządzania i administracji przyjaznego środowisku. (abstrakt oryginalny)

The article focuses on identifying priority areas for greening and sustainable development for OECD countries and Ukraine. They aim to achieve overall progress in the interaction between the economy and the environment. Additionally, the aim is to create prerequisites for encouraging innovation and investment to find new sources of economic growth that are compatible with ecosystems that are capable of recovering from damage. It has been demonstrated that although the global goals of greening economies are relevant for all countries, they must be tailored to the regional and national specificities, as well as each country's level of economic development.
The study used general qualitative and quantitative methods of economic research, including systematic, comparative analysis, methods of logical and statistical analysis, and index method, among others. The applied theoretical and methodological approach allowed us to identify general trends in the development of environmental factors in the OECD countries and Ukraine and their impact on economic growth. Specifically, the study analyzes the current state of affairs and perspectives for greening and sustainable development based on a comprehensive assessment of the level of greening in these economies and the relationship between the internal ecological environment - assessed using the indicators of "green growth" - and their economic development. The article also justifies priorities for greening and sustainable development and suggests practical measures for their implementation. They can serve as a basis for developing a policy of effective environmental management and elaborating a national system of environmentally friendly management and administration. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Anderson, D. (2013), Environmental Economics and Natural Resource Management, Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315884257
  2. Anderson, K., Blackhurst, R. (1992), Effects on the environment and welfare of liberalizing world trade: the cases of coal and food, The Greening of World Trade Issues, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.
  3. Banerjee, O., Cicowiez, M., Horridge, M., Vargas, R. (2016), A conceptual framework for integrated economic-environmental modeling, "Journal of Environment and Development", 25 (3), pp. 276-305, https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496516658753
  4. Blanc, I., Friot, D., Margni, M., Jolliet, O. (2008), Towards a new index for environmental sustainability based on a DALY weighting approach, "Sustainable Development", 16 (4), pp. 251-260, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.376
  5. Colby, M.E. (1989), The Evolution of Paradigms of Environmental Management in Development, http://documents.banquemondiale.org/curated/fr/552371468913746182/pdf/multi-page.pdf (accessed: 26.01.2020).
  6. Daly, H., Farley, J. (2010), Ecological economics: Principles and applications, Island Press, Washington.
  7. Dovgal, O., Panova, I. (2018a), Environmental policy in the process of greening economic development, "Problems of Economy", 4 (38), pp. 280-285, https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2018-4-380-385
  8. Dovgal, O., Panova, I. (2018b), Evolution of Environmental Management Concepts in Terms of Global Environmental Challenges, "Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University", Series: "International Relations. Еconomics, Country Studies. Tourism", No. 9, pp. 109-114.
  9. Ehrlich, P., Ehrlich, A., Holdren, J. (1977), Ecoscience: Population. Resources, Environment, W.H. Freeman and Company, San Franciscо.
  10. Esty, D. (1994), Greening the GATT: Trade, environment and the future, Peterson Institute Press, Washington.
  11. Global Goalscast (2018), Overview, https://globalgoalscast.org/about-us (accessed: 29.01.2020).
  12. Green Economy Options For Ukraine (2018), Opportunities for organic agriculture, Policy Brief, http://www.green-economies-eap.org/resources/Ukraine%20OA%20ENG%2027%20Jun.pdf (accessed: 11.02.2020).
  13. Green Growth Knowledge Platform (2000-2017), GGKP Data Explorer, https://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/data-explorer#/line?country=245&indicator=299&startYear=2000&endYear=2017 (accessed: 1.03.2020).
  14. Greening Economies in the European Union's Eastern Neighbourhood: From commitment to results. Programme (EaP GREEN) (2018), Resource Library, http://www.green-economies-eap.org/resources/EaP%20GREEN_From%20Commitments%20to%20Results.pdf (accessed: 12.02.2020).
  15. Huber, J. (1991), Ecological modernization. Away from scarcity, soberness and bureaucracy, [in:] A. Mol, G. Spaargaren, A. Kalpxijk (eds.), Technologie en Milieubeheer, SDU, Den Haag.
  16. Hull, Ch.H. (ed.) (1899), The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, Routledge/Thoemmes, London.
  17. Ignatov, V., Kokin, A., Baturin, L. (1999), Balanced nature management, Rostizdat, Rostov-na-Donu.
  18. Jackson, T. (2017), Prosperity Without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow, Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315677453
  19. Janicka, M. (2016), Financial markets and the challenges of sustainable growth, "Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe", 19 (2), pp. 27-41, https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0011
  20. Kazakov, N., Li, I., Popkov, V. (2009), Recreational environmental entrepreneurship. Monografiya, SPbGIEU, Sankt-Peterburg.
  21. Kitzes, J., Peller, A., Goldfinger, S., Wackernagel, M. (2007), Current Method for Calculating National Ecological Footprint Accounts, "Science for Environment & Sustainable Society", 4 (1), https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/96a3/a3a5d654008d7a0d127e296019c90fd225fd.pdf (accessed: 11.03.2020).
  22. Knoema Corporation (US) (2018), Gross domestic product in current prices growth rate, https://knoema.com/atlas/topics/Economy/National-Accounts-Gross-Domestic-Product/GDP-growth (accessed: 22.01.2020).
  23. Malthus, T. (1798), An Essay on the Principle of Population, J. Johnson, in St. Paul's Church-Yard, London.
  24. Matyushenko, I., Goncharenko N., Michaylova D. (2015), Future Consideration for Developing Energy Efficient Economy in Ukraine using Light Emitting Diode (LED) Enginery on the basis of NBIC-Technologies, "Global Journal of Management and Business Research: Economics and Commerce", 15 (5), pp. 1-19, https://doi.org/10.9734/BJEMT/2015/18567
  25. Meadows, D., Randers, J., Meadows, D. (2007), Limits to growth. The 30-year update, Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction.
  26. Meadows, D., Randers, J., Meadows, D., Behrens, W. (1972), The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind, Universe Books, New York, https://doi.org/10.1349/ddlp.1
  27. New Atlas of the Green Economy (2019), The Global Green Economy Index, https://dualcitizeninc.com/global-green-economy-index/economic-environmental-indicators.php?id=9 (accessed: 14.01.2020).
  28. OECD (1990-2018), Green Growth Indicators, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=GREEN_GROWTH (accessed: 5.01.2020).
  29. Podlesnaya, V. (2012), The formation of the economic mechanism of environmental management at the development of social reproduction socio-economic cycles, "The Mechanism of Economy Regulation", 2, pp. 208-212, http://mer.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/content/acticles/issue_10/V_G_PodlesnaBecoming_economic_mechanism_of_nature_in_the_development_of_socio_economic_cycles_of_social_reproduction.pdf (accessed: 11.01.2020).
  30. Report on Green Transformation in Ukraine. Based on OECD Green Growth Indicators (2016), http://www.green-economies-eap.org/resources/2016_GreenTransformation%20in%20Ukraine%20ENG.pdf (accessed: 9.01.2020).
  31. Reznikova, N. (2016), Ecological imperatives for extension of globalization processes: problem of economic security, "Investments: Practice and Experience", 21, pp. 23-26, http://www.investplan.com.ua/pdf/21_2016/6.pdf (accessed: 16.01.2020).
  32. Rogers, P., Jalal, K., Boyd, J. (2006), An Introduction to Sustainable Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  33. Setyawan, D. (2020), Economy-wide energy efficiency using a comprehensive decomposition method, "Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management", 6 (3), pp. 385-402.
  34. Singh, A.K., Issac, J., Narayanan, K.G.S. (2019), Measurement of environmental sustainability index and its association with socio-economic indicators in selected Asian economies: an empirical investigation, "International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development", 18 (1), https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2019.098641
  35. Sustainable Development Report (2019), Transformations to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, https://www.sustainabledevelopment.report (accessed: 18.01.2020).
  36. Svenningsen, L.S., Thorsen, B.J. (2020), Preferences for Distributional Impacts of Climate Policy, "Environ Resource Economics", 75, pp. 1-24, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00386-z
  37. Škrinjarić, T. (2020), Re-examining sustainable development in Europe: a data envelopment approach, "International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development", 19 (1), pp. 72-109, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2020.10027205
  38. United Nations (2018), Development Programme. GRID-Arendal. Global environmental trends, https://www.grida.no/resources/5488 (accessed: 21.01.2020).
  39. United Nations (2019), United Nations Environment Programme. Global Environment Outlook 6, https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/global-environment-outlook-6 (accessed: 21.01.2020).
  40. Wackernagel, M., White, K., Moran, D. (2004), Using Ecological Footprint accounts: from analysis to applications, "Environment and Sustainable Development", 3 (3/4), https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2004.005077
  41. Wackernagel, M., Lin, D., Evans, M., Hanscom, L., Raven, P. (2019), Defying the Footprint Oracle: Implications of Country Resource Trends, "Sustainability", 11, 2164, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072164
  42. Weizsäcker, E., Hargroves, K., Smith, M. (2010), Faktor Fünf. Die Formel für nachhaltiges Wachstum, Droemer, München.
  43. Weizsäcker, E., Lovins, A., Lovins, L. (1995), Faktor Vier. Doppelter Wohlstand - halbierter Naturverbrauch. Der neue Bericht an den Club of Rome, Droemer Knaur, München.
  44. Wiesmeth, H. (2012), Environmental economics. Theory and Policy in Equilibrium, Springer, London-New York.
  45. World Resources Institute (2018), Trends Point to Gains in Human Development, While Many Negative Human Impacts on Vital Ecosystems are Increasing, https://www.griequity.com/resources/Environment/Global%20Environmental%20Trends.htm (accessed: 24.01.2020).
  46. Yashalova, N. (2015), Assessment of the level of greening the economy of region, "Environmental economics", 3, pp. 67-75, https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23615026 (accessed: 8.01.2020).
  47. Yashalova, N., Ruban, D. (2016), Development of green business as an approach to financing the greening of economy, "Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast", 5, pp. 219-237, https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2016.5.47.12
  48. Zerkalov, D. (2013), Problems of sustainable development ecology, Osnova, Kiev.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1508-2008
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.24.03
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu