BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Kantyka Zbigniew (Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach)
Tytuł
Teoretyczna i metodologiczna koncepcja szkoły chicagowskiej w nauce o polityce
Theoretical and Methodological Concept of the Chicago School in the Political Science
Źródło
Studia Politicae Universitatis Silesiensis, 2014, T. 12, s. 13-26
Słowa kluczowe
Politologia, Nauki społeczne, Chicagowska szkoła ekonomii, Socjologia, Studium przypadku
Political science, Social sciences, Chicago School, Sociology, Case study
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
As part of the research methodology in the social sciences, sociological orientation, created and developed in the 1920s and 1930s in Chicago, achieved great importance and publicity. Its assumptions and achievements were thoroughly discussed, were and are often cited in the scientific literature. While relatively rarely mentions can be found of the existing at the same time, largely separate institutionally and personally, Chicago School in the political science, the creators and participants of which attempted to redefine the goals and methods of studying political reality. The background for new proposals were normative assumptions dominant in the first decades of the 20th century, of the so-called classical political science, very different from the model of empirical science focused on the search for a general theory which started to become a standard in all disciplines. A new scientific discipline, emerging at the turn of the century, devoted to the study of politics was primarily inspired by the achievements and traditions of such sciences as political philosophy, legal studies or political history. It influenced obviously its normative character by directing the interest of researchers primarily to considerations related to the legal and constitutional solutions and analysis of the formal dimension of political institutions. During this period, the real world of politics remained outside of analyses - thus, differently than in the 19th century sociology with positivist orientation, no particular attention was paid to the importance of scientific data obtained by using empirical methods. My text contains a concise presentation of the scientific profiles of the main representatives of the Chicago School in the political science - Charles E. Merriam, Harold D. Lasswell, and Harold F. Gosnell. Their theoretical and methodological ideas on the methods of study and mechanisms of political reality, which they used in their academic activities and research work, in an unquestionable way influenced the development of modern political science. As far as the methodology is concerned, the article is based on a direct analysis of key source texts and on the attempt to interpret their contents and significance of the proposals contained therein, in the context of the methodological dilemmas of modern political science.(original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. G. Castle: The Blackwell Guide to Literary Theory. Oxford 2007
  2. The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion. Ed. J. R. Hinnells. New York 2010
  3. The Chicago School of Political Economy. Ed. W. J. Samuels. East Lansing 1976
  4. The Chicago School of Pragmatism: Early Debates on Instrumentalism (1903-1911). Ed. J. R. Shook. Bristol 2000
  5. K. Czekaj: Socjologia szkoły chicagowskiej i jej recepcja w Polsce. Katowice 2007
  6. P. D. Reagan: Designing a New America: The Origins of New Deal Planning 1890-1943. Amherst 2000
  7. Ch. E. Merriam: A History of American Political Theories. New York
  8. Ch. E. Merriam: The Present State of the Study of Politics. "American Political Science Review" 1921, Vol. 15, No. 2
  9. B. D. Karl: Charles E. Merriam and the Study of Politics. Chicago 1974
  10. M. T. Heaney, J. M. Hansen: Building the Chicago School. "American Political Science Review" 2006, Vol. 100, No. 4
  11. A. Somit, J. Tanenhaus: The Development of American Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism. Boston 1967
  12. B. A. L. Lowell: The Physiology of Politics. "American Political Science Review" 1910, Vol. 4, No. 1
  13. Ch. E. Merriam: Progress in Political Research. "American Political Science Review" 1926, Vol. 20, No. 1
  14. Ch. E. Merriam: Political Power. New York 1934
  15. Ch. E. Merriam: Outlook for Social Politics in the United States. "American Journal of Sociology", Vol. 18, No. 5
  16. Ch. E. Merriam: New Aspects of Politics. Chicago-Illinois 1925
  17. Ch. E. Merriam: The Making of Citizens: A Comparative Study of Methods of Civic Training. Chicago 1931
  18. Ch. E. Merriam: Civic Education in the United States. New York 1934
  19. L. D. White: The Local Community Research Committee and the Social Science Research Building. In: Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research. Ed. L. D. White. Chicago 1929
  20. L. V. Jones: L. L. Thurstone: Vision of Psychology as a Quantitative Rational Science. In: Portraits of Pioneers of Psychology. Vol. 3. Eds. G. A. Kimble, M. Wertheimer. Washington 1998
  21. American Political Scientists: A Dictionary. Eds. G. H. Utter, C. Lockhart. Westport 2002
  22. R. Seidelman: Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis, 1884-1984. New York 1985
  23. H. D. Lasswell: Chicago's Old First Ward. A Case Study in Political Behavior. "National Municipal Review" 1923, Vol. 12, Issue 3
  24. H. D. Lasswell: Propaganda Technique in the World War. New York 1927
  25. L. Porębski: Między przemocą a godnością. Teoria polityczna Harolda D. Lasswella. Kraków 2007
  26. Politics, Personality, and Social Science in the Twentieth Century: Essays in Honor of Harold D. Lasswell. Ed. A. A. Rogow. Chicago 1969
  27. H. D. Lasswell: Psychopatology and Politics. New York 1927
  28. H. D. Lasswell: World Politics and Personal Insecurity. New York 1934
  29. H. D. Lasswell: Politics: Who Gets What, When, and How. Whittlesey House. New York 1936
  30. G. Almond: A Discipline Divided. Schools and Sects in Political Science. Newbury Park 1990
  31. H. D. Lasswell, D. Blumenstock: World Revolutionary Propaganda. A Chicago Study. New York-London 1939
  32. H. F. Gosnell: Thomas C. Platt: Political Manager. "Political Science Quarterly" 1923, Vol. 38, No. 3
  33. H. F. Gosnell: Boss Platt and His New York Machine: A Study of the Political Leadership of Thomas C. Platt, Theodore Roosevelt, and Others. Chicago 1924
  34. Ch. E. Merriam: Introduction. W: H. F. Gosnell: Boss Platt and His New York Machine: A Study of the Political Leadership of Thomas C. Platt, Theodore Roosevelt, and Others. Chicago 1924
  35. Ch. E. Merriam, H. F. Gosnell: Non-Voting: Causes and Methods of Control. Chicago 1924
  36. H. F. Gosnell: Getting Out the Vote: An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting. Chicago 1927
  37. G. E. G. Catlin: Harold F. Gosnell's Experiments in the Stimulation of Voting. In: Methods in Social Science: A Case Book. Ed. S. A. Rice. Chicago 1931
  38. H. F. Gosnell: Negro Politicians: The Rise of Negro Politics in Chicago. Chicago 1935
  39. H. F. Gosnell: Machine Politics: Chicago Model. Chicago 1937
  40. O. Jütersonke: Morgenthau, Law and Realism. New York 2010
  41. C. B. Truman: Disillusion and Regeneration: The Quest for a Discipline. "American Political Science Review" 1965, Vol. 59, No. 4
  42. D. M. T. Heaney: The Chicago School That Never Was. "PS: Political Science & Politics" 2007, Vol. 40, No 4
  43. H. A. Simon: Charles E. Merriam and the "Chicago School" of Political Science. Urbana 1987
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2353-9747
Język
pol
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu