BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Zavodna Lucie Sara (College of Polytechnics Jihlava, Jihlava, Czech Republic), Trejtnarova Lucie (Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Czech Republic)
Tytuł
Sustainable Packaging in Footwear Industry: Case Study of PUMA
Źródło
Economics, Management and Sustainability, 2021, vol. 6, nr 1, s. 27-33, rys., tab., bibliogr. 30 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Przemysł obuwniczy, Produkcja opakowań, Innowacje w opakowalnictwie, Opakowania ekologiczne, Rozwój zrównoważony, Ochrona środowiska
Shoe industry, Production of packaging, Innovations in packaging, Ecological wrapping, Sustainable development, Environmental protection
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: Q01, Q56, M31
summ.
Abstrakt
Modern companies are more focused on the life cycle of their products, so it comes also with sustainable packaging of products. Some companies do this on their own initiative, others because of customer's pressure. There are already several experiments, where companies introduced packaging that can be disposed of in an environmentally friendly way or reused. The main goal of the paper is to describe case study of sustainable packaging in the footwear industry. Main findings and implications. Even big producers of shoes are facing troubles with sustainable packaging solutions. The case study shows why PUMA abandoned the new sustainable packaging of shoes. After trying sustainable packaging, PUMA returned to the classic cardboard box in 2015. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
  2. Bramklev, C. (2009). On a proposal for a generic package development process. Packaging Technology and Science, 22(3), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.850
  3. Fuseproject. (2020, December 10). https://www.fuseproject.com/work/puma-clever-little-bag
  4. Garcia-Arca, J. & Prado-Prado (2008). Packaging design model from supply chain approach. Supply Chain Management, 13(5), 375-380.
  5. Graphic Information Design Blog. (2010). Sustainable Futures Exhibition: Design Museum. http://gdes2012tutor.blogspot.com/2010/04/sustainable-futures-exhibition-design.html
  6. Jonson, G. (2000). Packaging Technology for the Logistician. Lund University, Lund.
  7. Knobloch, K., Yoon, U., & Vogt, P. M. (2011). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 39(2), 91-92.
  8. Liu, Y. X., & Zhang, Y. (2010). Study on universal packaging design and its environmental utility based on the theory of "Make the Best Use of Everything". Packaging Engineering, 16 (003).
  9. Magnier, L., Schoormans, J.P.L., & Mugge, R. (2016). Judging a product by its cover: Packaging sustainability and perceptions of quality in food products. Food Quality and Preference, 53, 132-142.
  10. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2013). The upcycle: Beyond sustainability, designing for abundance. New York: North Point Press.
  11. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
  12. Novak, B. (2016). UNIT 9 - Sustainable packaging for footwear. https://www.step2sustainability.eu/docs/Unit9.pdf
  13. PE Americas. (2010). Life Cycle Assessment of different shoe packaging design for PUMA.
  14. PUMA Sustainability Report 2012. (2020, December 12). https://about.puma.com/en/sustainability/reporting
  15. PUMA Sustainability Report 2014. (2020, December 14). https://about.puma.com/en/sustainability/reporting
  16. PUMA. (2010). Puma's new packaging and distribution system to save more than 60% of paper and water annually. https://about.puma.com/en/newsroom/corporate-news/2010/04-13-2010-pumas-new-packaging-and-distribution-system
  17. Robertson, G. L. (2012). Food packaging: Principles and practice (3rd ed.): CRC press.
  18. Rokka, J., & Uusitalo, L. (2008). Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices-do consumers care?. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 516-525.
  19. Siegle, L. (2010). Recycle: The essential guide. London: Black Dog.
  20. Sustainable Packaging Coalition. (2011). Definition of sustainable packaging. Virginia: GreenBlue.
  21. Sutanto, S.M. (2018). Clever Little Bag"Green Packaging Inovation from Puma. Visual Communication Design Journal, 3(1), 1-12.
  22. The Consumer Goods Forum. (2010). A Global Language for Packaging and Sustainability. Paris.
  23. The Economist (2007, 07.06.). The truth about recycling, 383, 24.
  24. Triads (2020, December 5). https://www.triads.co.uk/triads-mens-c1/footwear-c24/trainers-c211/puma-r698-green-box-pack-trainers-amazon-green-p70505
  25. Viupax (2020, December 1). http://viupax.com/sustainable-packaging/eco-friendly-shoe-box/
  26. Wang, L., & Yang, M. (2008). Green Packaging Design on the Principle of 3R. Packaging Engineering, 2(058).
  27. Welbel, J. (2011). Puma's "Clever Little Bag". Packaging strategies. https://www.packagingstrategies.com/articles/92042-puma-s-clever-little-bag
  28. Williams, H., Wikstrom, F. & Lofgren, M. (2008). A life cycle perspective on environmental effects of customer focused packaging development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 7, 853-859.
  29. Winston, A. (2018). Puma and MIT Design Lab envision a future of self-adapting, performance-enhancing sportswear. Dezeen. https://www.dezeen.com/2018/05/24/mit-media-lab-puma-future-sportswear-design/
  30. Zhang, G., & Zhao, Z. (2012). Green packaging management of logistics enterprises. Physics Procedia, 24, 900-905.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2520-6303
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.14254/jems.2021.6-1.2
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu