BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Vagianos Dimitrios (University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece), Koutsoupias Nikos (University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece)
Tytuł
Framing Coworking Spaces Marketing Strategies via Social Media Indices
Określenie zakresu strategii marketingowych przestrzeni coworkingowych na podstawie wskaźników mediów społecznościowych
Źródło
Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, 2021, vol. 25, nr 2, s. 1-14, rys., tab., bibliogr. 58 poz.
Ekonometria
Słowa kluczowe
Analiza korespondencji, Hierarchiczne metody klasyfikacyjne, Media społecznościowe, Marketing, Coworking
Correspondence analysis, Hierarchical classification methods, Social media, Marketing, Coworking
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: C38, L81
streszcz., summ.
Abstrakt
W artykule zaprezentowano wyniki badania technik marketingu społecznościowego w biznesie typu coworking przy użyciu zbiorów danych uzyskanych za pomocą narzędzi do monitorowania mediów społecznościowych. Do wycinania danych pochodzących z aktywności kont firmy WeWork na Instagramie i Twitterze wykorzystano Mediatoolkit. Dane były gromadzone 24 godziny na dobę, 7 dni w tygodniu, z różnych lokalizacji i w wielu językach, w piętnastodniowym przedziale czasowym. Wskaźniki związane z sentymentem, zasięgiem, wpływem, liczbą obserwujących, retweetami, polubieniami, komentarzami i wynikami wyświetleń utworzyły zbiory danych, które zostały zbadane za pomocą analizy korespondencji wielu zmiennych, a także metody hierarchicznego grupowania. Celem artykułu jest zbadanie nieodłącznych właściwości wielu indeksów opisujących ogólną dziedzinę narzędzi marketingu wykorzystywanych w social mediach. Autorzy pragną udostępnić marketerom cyfrowym alternatywną perspektywę prowadzenia strategii marketingowych w obszarze mediów społecznościowych związanych z nowatorskimi przedsięwzięciami dotyczącymi przestrzeni coworkingowych. Zidentyfikowano trzy kategorie/segmenty postów, przy czym polaryzacja postów zwykle odnosi się do lokalizacji geograficznej, niezależnie od kanału mediów społecznościowych używanego do publikowania.(abstrakt oryginalny)

In this paper an investigation of social media marketing techniques of Coworking spaces' type of business is performed, using datasets acquired using social media monitoring tools. Mediatoolkit has been used to scrap data deriving from the activity of the WeWork Instagram and Twitter accounts which were collected on a 24/7 basis from varying locations and in multiple languages in a fifteen-day time window. Indices related to sentiment, reach, influence, number of followers, retweets, likes, comments, and view scores formed the datasets that were examined by applying multiple correspondence analysis as well as the hierarchical clustering method. The aim of this paper was to explore the inherent properties of the multiple indices describing the general realm of social media marketing tools, and more specifically aspires to provide digital marketers with an alternative perspective of social media marketing strategies related to the emerging coworking spaces type of business. The authors identified three classes/segments of posts, whereas post polarity tends to relate to geographic location, regardless of the social media channel used for posting.(original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka SGH im. Profesora Andrzeja Grodka
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Alves, H., Fernandes, C., and Raposo, M. (2016). Social media marketing: A literature review and implications. Psychology and Marketing, 33, 1029-1038.
  2. Arora, A., Arora, A. S., and Palvia, S. (2014). Social media index valuation: Impact of technological, social, economic and ethical dimensions. Journal of Promotion Management, 20, 328-344. doi: 10.1080/10496491.2014.908803
  3. Ashley, C., and Tuten, T. (2015). Creative strategies in social media marketing: An exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Psychology and Marketing, 32, 15-27. doi: 10.1002/mar.20761
  4. Barutcu, M. T. (2017). Big data analytics for marketing revolution. Journal of Media Critiques, 3(11). doi: 10.17349/jmc117314
  5. Bejaei, M., Cliff, M. A., and Singh, A. (2020). Multiple correspondence and hierarchical cluster analyses for the profiling of fresh apple customers using data from two marketplaces. Foods, 9(7), 873. doi: 10.3390/foods9070873
  6. Benzecri, J. P. (1992). Correspondence analysis handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker. Brida, J. G., Scuderi, R., and Seijas, M. N. (2014). Segmenting cruise passengers visiting Uruguay: A factor-cluster analysis. International Journal of Tourism Research, 16(3), 209-222. doi: 10.1002/ jtr.1916
  7. Bucko, J., Kakalejčík, L., and Ferencová, M. (2018). Online shopping: Factors that affect consumer purchasing behavior. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1). doi: 10.1080/23311975.2018.1535751
  8. Chen, Y., Fay, S., and Wang, Q. (2011). The role of marketing in social media: How online consumer reviews evolve. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25, 85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2011.01.003
  9. Clausen, S. E. (1998). Applied correspondence analysis: An introduction. Vol. 121. Sage.
  10. Constantinescu, T., and Devisch, O. (2018). Portraits of work: Mapping emerging coworking dynamics. Information Communication and Society, 21, 1263-1278. doi: 10.1080/136 9118X.2018.1459775
  11. Desarbo, W. S., Hausman, R. E., and Kulkitz, J. M. (2007). Restricted principal components analysis for marketing research. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(3). doi: 10.1108/17465660710834471
  12. Diana, M., and Pronello, C. (2010). Traveler segmentation strategy with nominal variables through correspondence analysis. Transport Policy, 17(3), 183-190.
  13. dos Santos, J. R. R., Dias, C. M., and Chiavegatto Filho, A. (2020). Machine learning and national health data to improve evidence: Finding segmentation in individuals without private insurance. Health Policy and Technology. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.11.002
  14. Foertsch, C. (2019). 2019 State of Coworking: Over 2 million coworking space members expected. Retrieved from https://www.deskmag.com/en/coworking-news/2019-state-of-coworking-spaces- 2-million-members-growth-crisis-market-report-survey-study
  15. Gandini, A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 15, pp. 193-205.
  16. Garrigos-Simon, F. J., Alcamí, R. L., and Ribera, T. B. (2012). Social networks and Web 3.0: Their impact on the management and marketing of organizations. Management Decision, 50. doi: 10.1108/00251741211279657
  17. Ghorbani, A. (2013). Marketing in the cyber era: Strategies and emerging trends. IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4864-7
  18. Gürsoy, U. T., Bulut, D., and Yigit, C. (2017). Social media mining and sentiment analysis for brand management. Global Journal of Emerging Trends in e-Business, Marketing and Consumer Psychology (GJETeMCP), 3(1).
  19. Husson, F., Josse, J., and Pages, J. (2010). Principal component methods-hierarchical clustering-partitional clustering: Why would we need to choose for visualizing data. Semantic Scholar. Retrieved October 6, 2020 from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Principal-component-methodshierarchical- clustering-Josse/04335d99d840ac3370f5aeb262828cf127d3ff1c
  20. Iglesias, C. A., and Moreno, A. (2019). Sentiment analysis for social media. Applied Sciences, 9(23), 5037, MDPI.
  21. Ivaldi, S., Pais, I., Scaratti, G. (2018). Coworking(s) in the plural: Coworking spaces and new ways of managing. The New Normal of Working Lives. Springer International Publishing, 219-241. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66038-7_11
  22. Kaplan, A. M., and Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
  23. Kassambara, A., and Mundt, F. (2017). Package "factoextra" for R: Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. Retrieved October 6, 2020 from https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package= factoextra/
  24. Kefi, H., Indra, S., and Abdessalem, T. (2016). Social media marketing analytics: A multicultural approach applied to the beauty& cosmetic sector (Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) proceedings, Paper 176).
  25. Kubátová, J. (2014). The cause and impact of the development of coworking in the current knowledge economy (Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM 2), 571- -577.
  26. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., and Isaac, H. (2016). The new office: How coworking changes the work concept. Journal of Business Strategy, 37, 3-9. doi: 10.1108/JBS-10-2015-0105
  27. Lipiäinen, H. (2014). Digitization of the communication and its implications for marketing. Jyväskylä Studies in Business and Economics, 152, University of Jyväskylä.
  28. Markic, B., Sanja, B., and Bevanda, A. (2016). Sentiment analysis of social networks as a challenge to the digital marketing. Ekonomski Vjesnik/Econviews-Review of Contemporary Business, Entrepreneurship and Economic Issues, XXIX(1/2016), 95-107.
  29. Merkel, J. (2015). Coworking in the city. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 15, 121-139.
  30. Mirkin, B. (2012). Clustering: A data recovery approach. CRC Press.
  31. Misirlis, N., and Vlachopoulou, M. (2018). Social media metrics and analytics in marketing - S3M: A mapping literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.10.005
  32. Moschidis, O., Chatzipetrou, E., and Tsiotras, G. (2018). Quality costing and quality management maturity in Greece: An exploratory multi-dimensional data analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(1), 171-191. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-2016-0152
  33. Naeem, M. (2019). Do social networking platforms promote service quality and purchase intention of customers of service-providing organizations?, Journal of Management Development, 38, 561- -581. doi: 10.1108/jmd-11-2018-0327
  34. Nicolosi, A., Fava, N., and Marcianò, C. (2018). Consumers' preferences for local fish products in Catalonia, Calabria and Sicily. (In International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives, 103-112). Cham: Springer.
  35. Olanrewaju, A. S. T., Hossain, M. A., Whiteside, N., and Mercieca, P. (2020). Social media and entrepreneurship research: A literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 90-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.011
  36. Palmatier, R. W., and Steinhoff, L. (2019). Relationship marketing in the digital age. Routledge.
  37. Punj, G., and Steward, D. W. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, XX, May.
  38. Rambocas, M., and Gama, J. (2013). Marketing research: The role of sentiment analysis. (FEP Working Papers, No. 489), April.
  39. Sawicki, A. (2016). Digital marketing. World Scientific News, 48, 82-88.
  40. Sullivan, M. (2018). Survey finds that collaboration is key to employee happiness. WeWork ideas, Retrieved September 14, 2019 from https://www.wework.com/ideas/survey-finds-that-collaborationis- key-to-employee-happiness
  41. Spinuzzi, C., Bodrožić, Z., Scaratti, G., and Ivaldi, S. (2019). coworking is about community: But what is community in coworking?, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33, 112-140. doi: 10.1177/1050651918816357
  42. Statista. (2018a). Number of coworking spaces worldwide 2018. Retrieved September 14, 2019 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/554273/number-of-coworking-spaces-worldwide/
  43. Statista. (2018b). Coworking spaces: Number of members worldwide 2018. Retrieved September 14, 2019 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/554315/number-of-people-working-in-coworkingspaces- worldwide/
  44. Tajvidi, R., and Karami, A. (2017). The effect of social media on firm performance. Computers in Human Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.026
  45. Thoma, B., Sanders, J., Lin, M., Paterson, Q. S., Steeg, J., and Chan T. M. (2015). The Social Media Index: Measuring the impact of emergency medicine and critical care websites. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, March 2015. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.1.24860
  46. Tiago, M. T. P. M. B., and Veríssimo, J. M. C. (2014). Digital marketing and social media: Why bother?, Business Horizons, 57, 703-708. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2014.07.002
  47. Treboux, J., Cretton, F., Genoud, D., Calvé, A., Evéquoz, F., Jarac, A. J., and Larpin, B. (2016). SoDA - Social Media Data Analysis (1st Swiss Text Analytics Conference), Whinterthur, Switzerland, June.
  48. Tuten, T. L., and Solomon, M. R. (2017). Social media marketing. Sage Publishing. Vagianos, D. and Koutsoupias, N. (2019). Twitter & instagram indices analysis as a tool to frame coworking spaces digital marketing strategy (16th International Federation of Classification Societies) 26-29 August 2019, Thessaloniki, Greece. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15566.61763
  49. Van de Koevering, J. G. C. (2017). The preferred characteristics of coworking spaces the relation between user characteristics and preferred coworking space characteristics: An attribute based stated choice experiment. Student thesis (Master), Eindhoven University of Technology.
  50. Weijs-Perrée, M., van de Koevering, J., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., and Arentze, T. (2019). Analysing user preferences for co-working space characteristics. Building Research and Information, 47, 534- -548. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2018.1463750
  51. Wen, C. H., and Chen, W. Y. (2010). Airlines' competitive positioning using multiple correspondence cluster analysis (12th WCTR, July), 11-15.
  52. Zhou, A., Qian, A., and Ma, H. (2012). Social media data analysis for revealing collective behaviors (KDD '12: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, August 2012). doi: 10.1145/2339530.2339746
  53. FinancesOnline. (2019). Retrieved from https://crm.financesonline.com/
  54. Mediatoolkit. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.mediatoolkit.com/
  55. WeWork. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.wework.com
  56. We Are Social. (2019). Retrieved from https://wearesocial.com/global-digital-report-2019
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1507-3866
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15611/eada.2021.2.01
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu