BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Dakhli Anissa (Sousse University, Sousse, Tunisia)
Tytuł
Budget Behaviour and Cultural Contingencies : Case Study in a Tunisian Company
Źródło
International Journal of Contemporary Management, 2021, nr 2, s. 19-30, rys., tab., bibliogr. 90 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Przedsiębiorstwo, Budżet przedsiębiorstwa, Kultura, Zarządzanie partycypacyjne, Uwarunkowania społeczno-kulturowe, Studium przypadku
Enterprises, Budgets of enterprises, Culture, Participative management, Social and cultural condition, Case study
Uwagi
summ.
Kraj/Region
Tunezja
Tunisia
Abstrakt
Background. Budgetary participation has a positive impact on a variety of emotional and behavioural responses. However, the review of empirical studies conducted in Tunisia reveals a low participation rate among operating managers in the budget control systems of their companies.
Research aims. The purpose of this study is to understand, from a contingency perspective, the practices of budgetary participation in Tunisian companies. It aims to explore forms of budgetary participation practised by Tunisian companies and examine to what extent Tunisian cultural variables explain these budgetary behaviours.
Methodology. A qualitative methodology based on a single case study was used. The data collected were the subject of a thematic content analysis.
Findings. The results show that the Tunisian companies have serious difficulties engaging in budgetary participation. Several factors hinder the implementation and operation of this budgetary practice. The primary factors include personality variables that, although interact with cultural values rooted in Tunisian society, create a psychological inconsistency between the ideal environment for the development and success of a participative approach and the environment of the Tunisian company. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Ali, A., & Machungwa, P. (1985). Participative management in developing countries. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 6(1), 1-24.
  2. Allali, B. (2008). Culture and management in Morocco: an atypical osmosis. In E. D. J. P. Dupuis & J. F. Chanlat (Eds.), Gestion en contexte interculturel: approches, problématiques, pratiques et plongées (pp. 1-36). Presse de l'université de Laval.
  3. Allard-Poesi, F. (2015). Qualitative methods in management research: main roads, turns and side roads. In J.-L. Moriceau & R. Soparnot (Eds.), Pratiques des méthodes Qualitatives. EMS.
  4. Alofan, F., Chen, S., & Tan, H. (2020). National cultural distance, organizational culture, and adaptation of management innovations in foreign subsidiaries: A fuzzy set analysis of TQM implementation in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Business Research, 109, 184-199.
  5. Amir, A., Ridwan, R., Din, M., Yamin, N., Zahra, F., & Firman, M. (2021). The role of budget participation in improving managerial performance. Accounting, 7(2), 269-280.
  6. Apriwandi, & Supriyono, R. A. (2021). Actual participation: the effects of information sharing and familiarity team on budget decision quality. International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, 14(2), 188-195.
  7. Argyris, C. (1952). The impact of budgets. Controllership Foundation.
  8. Azzouz, E., & Ben Mahjoub, L. (2017). Links between budgetary participation, size and performance: the case of firms in Morocco. Revue Congolaise de Gestion, 2(24), 43-62.
  9. Baccouri, M., & Fedhila, H. (2017). Corporate budget governance through workforce engagement: As an antecedent to innovation. Corporate Board, Duties & Composition, 13(1), 47-58.
  10. Bardin, L. (2003). Content analysis (9th ed.). PUF.
  11. Ben Fadhel, A., & Soyah, T. (2004, March 18-20). Management research: the problem of collecting and processing qualitative information. [Paper presentation]. Conférence internationale: traversée des frontières entre méthodes de recherche qualitatives et quantitatives. ISEOR.
  12. Ben Hamadi, Z., Chapellier, P., & Dubus, F. V. (2014). Budgetary innovations in SMEs: the influence of the sector of activity and the profile of the manager. Innovations, 1(43), 223-252.
  13. Blai, M., & Martineau, S. (2006). General inductive analysis: description of a general approach to making sense of raw data. Recherches Qualitatives, 26(2), 1-18.
  14. Bonache, A. B., Chapellier, P., Ben Hamadi, Z., & Mohammed, A. (2015). Determinants of the complexity of SME managers' accounting information systems: cultural contingencies and endogeneity. Management International, 19(3), 148-168.
  15. Bonache, A., Maurice, J., & Moris, K. (2012). Budgetary participation and managerial performance: non-significant link and contingencies. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, 18(2), 125-184.
  16. Boujelbene, M. A., & Affes, H. (2012). The effect of environmental uncertainty and budgetary participation on performance and job satisfaction-evidence from the hotel industry. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 2(2), 1-17.
  17. Bourguignon, A., Malleret, V., & Norreklit, H. (2002). The irreducible cultural dimension of management tools: the example of the dashboard and the balanced scorecard. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, May, (3), 7-32.
  18. Boyer R. (1998). Hybridization and models of production: Geography, history and theory. In R. Boyer, E. Charron, J. Ulrich, & S. Tolliday (Eds.), Between imitation and innovation. Oxford University Press, 23-56.
  19. Bescos P.L., Cauvin E., Langevin P. & Mendoza. C. (2004). Critiques du budget : une approche contingente. Comptabilité, Contrôle, Audit, 10(1), 165-185.
  20. Brownell, P. (1982). Participation in budgeting process: When it works and when it doesn't. Journal of Accounting Literature, 1, 124-153.
  21. Brownell, P., & McInnes, M. (1986). Budgetary participation, motivation, and managerial performance. The Accounting Review, 52(4), 587-603.
  22. Brownell, P. (1981). Participation in budgeting, locus of control and organizational effectiveness. Accounting Review, 844-860.
  23. Brownell, P., & Dunk, A. S. (1991). Task uncertainty and its interaction with budgetary participation and budget emphasis: some methodological issues and empirical investigation. Accounting, organizations and society, 16(8), 693-703.
  24. Bruns, W. J., & Waterhouse, J. H. (1975). Budgetary control and organization structure. Journal of accounting research, 177-203.
  25. Chaffe, P. L. B., Innocente dos Santos, C., Perez, A. B. A., Sá, J. H. M., Carlotto, T., & Hoinaski, L. (2021). Observing the critical zone on a critical budget: The Peri Lake experimental catchment. Hydrological Processes, 35(3), e14087.
  26. Cheffi, W., & Nekhili, M. (2011). Rôles assignés à la comptabilité de gestion par les managers et changement comptable: question d'adéquation ou simple désillusion?. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, 17(1), 67-97.
  27. Govindarajan, V. (1986). Impact of participation in the budgetary process on managerial attitudes and performance: Universalistic and contingency perspectives. Decision sciences, 17(4), 496-516.
  28. Chenhall, R. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organization and Society, 28, 127-168.
  29. Chong, C. L., & Caby, J. (2010). The effects of national culture on the role of participation in different task situations. Advances in Accounting, 26(1), 128-133.
  30. Chow, C. W., Shields, M. D., & Wu, A. (1999). The importance of national culture in the design of and preference for management controls for multi-national operations. Accounting, Organization and Society, 24, 441-461.
  31. Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., & Samuel, S. (1996). Managerial accounting research: The contributions of organizational and sociological theories. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 8, 1-35.
  32. Dakhli, A. (2009, May). Budgetary participation, locus of control and job satisfaction in Tunisia [Paper presentation]. La place de la dimension européenne dans la Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, Strasbourg, France.
  33. Dakhli, A. (2021). Corporate budget governance through the operating managers engagement: Does locus of control matter? Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition, 17(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv17i1art4
  34. Dany, L. (2016). Qualitative analysis of the content of social representations. In G. Lo Monaco, S. Delouvée, & P. Rateau (Eds.), Les représentations sociales. de Boeck.
  35. Delaney, T. J., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949-969.
  36. D'Iribarne, P. (2008). Culture and development, management issues. Afrique Contemporaine, 2(226), 229-242.
  37. Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage.
  38. Elhamma, A. (2011). Essai d'explication de la diversité des pratiques relatives au suivi budgétaire: Cas des entreprises marocaines. Revue Marocaine de Gestion et d'Economie, (4).
  39. El Louadi, M. (2015). Cultural aspects of ICT adoption in the Arab world: The case of the Tunisian subculture. Presses Académiques Francophones.
  40. Fuadah, L.., Safitri, R. H., Yuliani, Y., & Arisman, A. (2020). Determinant Factors' Impact on Managerial Performance through Management Accounting Systems in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(10), 109-117.
  41. Frucot, V., & Shearon, W. (1991). Budgetary participation, locus of control, and Mexican managerial performance and job satisfaction. The Accounting Review, 66(1), 80-99.
  42. Gagnon, Y.-C. (2012). The case study as a research method. Presse de l'université de Québec.
  43. Ginglinger, E. (2002). The shareholder as controller. Revue française de gestion, 141(5).
  44. Ginting, W. A. (2021). Analysis of the effect of participation in budget development, budget clarity, job relevant information, and conflicts of interest on managerial performance with job satisfaction as a moderating variables (empirical study on hospitals). International Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Finance, 4(1), 1-13.
  45. Harrison, G. L., & McKinnon, J. L. (1999). Cross-cultural research in management control systems design: a review of the current state. Accounting, organizations and society, 24(5-6), 483-506.
  46. Hlady-Rispal, M., Avenir, M.-J., Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2009). Interpretations and qualitative methods. The quest for a grounded perspective. Revue Internationale de Psychosociologie, 25(35), 1-313.
  47. Hofstede G. (1967). The game of budget control. Royal van Gorcum Ltd.
  48. Hofstede, G. (1987). The applicability of McGregor's theories in South East Asia. Journal of Management Development.
  49. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage.
  50. Hope, J., & Fraser, R. (2003). Who needs budgets? Harvard Business Review, 108-115.
  51. Kahar, S. H., Chariri, A., & Rohman, A. (2016). Participative budgeting, budgetary slack and job satisfaction in the public sector. Journal of Applied Business Research, 32(6), 1663-1674.
  52. Kahar, S. H., Ikbal, M., Jabid, A. W., & Purbaya, A. (2019). Ethical optimism, participative budgeting, and managerial performance in regional government work unit in Indonesia: A contingency theory approach. Calitatea, 20(171), 70-75.
  53. Kanan, R. (2010). Cross-cultural impact on the budgeting cycle: An empirical comparison between Anglo-American and Libyan companies operating in the Libyan oil sector [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of Southern Queensland, Australia.
  54. Khadafi, M. (2015). Effect Of Budgetary Participation And Budget Adequacy On Individual Performance With Job Satisfaction As An Intervening Variable. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(2).
  55. Komarev, I. (2007). The place of budgets in the management control system: A contingent approach [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Université de l'IAE, Bordeaux IV.
  56. Kren, L. (2003). Effects of uncertainty, participation, and control system monitoring on the propensity to create budget slack and actual budget slack created. In Advances in Management Accounting. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  57. Lassoued, K. (2008). Management control and national culture: an attempt to adapt to the Tunisian context. Management International, 12(3), 91-103.
  58. Lau, C. M., Scully, G., & Lee, A. (2018). The effects of organizational politics on employee motivations to participate in target setting and employee budgetary participation. Journal of Business Research, 90, 247-259.
  59. Lavigne, B. (2002, October). Accounting information system of SMEs: an empirical research. R.C.F, 348.
  60. Lleo, S., & Davis, M. (2020). Behavioral Benchmarked Investment Management with Expert Forecasts. Available at SSRN 3754205.
  61. Mahdavi, G., Rezaei, G., & Mosavi Nejad, S. M. (2021). The effect of budgetary participation on hospitals' budgetary performance with considering mediating role of budget goal commitment and use of budget information: Evidence from comparison clinical and nonclinical managers. Journal of Governmental Accounting, 7(2), 29-42.
  62. Mansour, D. (2015). National culture and budgetary behavior: A comparative study between France and the Maghreb countries [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Université Montpellier.
  63. Martineau, S. (2005). Situational observation: Challenges, possibilities and limitations. Recherches Qualitatives, 2, 5-17.
  64. Merchant, K. A. (1981). The design of the corporate budgeting system: influences on managerial behavior and performance. Accounting Review, 813-829.
  65. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2003). Analysis of qualitative data. De Boeck.
  66. Mucchielli, A. (1996). Dictionary of Qualitative Methods in the Humanities. Armand Colin.
  67. Mui Yee, C., Sek Khin, E. W., & Ismail, K. (2016). An analysis of budgetary goals impacting organizational performance. The Audit Financiar Journal, 14(137), 551-566.
  68. Mulyanah, M., & Puspanita, I. (2021). Budget participation and managerial performance with organizational commitment and leadership style as a moderation. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu, 14(1), 16-38.
  69. Nabhan, F., & Munfa'ati, D. (2021, March). Managerial Performance Based on Participation Budgetary, Islamic Work Motivation and Organizational Commitment. In 3rd International Conference of Banking, Accounting, Management and Economics (ICOBAME 2020) (pp. 235-240). Atlantis Press.
  70. O'Connor, N. G. (1995). The influence of organizational culture on the usefulness of budget participation by Singaporean-Chinese managers. Accounting, Organization and Society, 20(5), 383-403.
  71. Oriade, A., Osinaike, A., Aduhene, K., & Wang, Y. (2021). Sustainability awareness, management practices and organisational culture in hotels: Evidence from developing countries. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, 102699.
  72. Paillé, P., & Mucchielli, A. (2008). Qualitative analysis in the humanities and social sciences. Paris, Armand Colin, 2e édition.
  73. Pariente, P. (1998). Intérêt des approches contingentes en contrôle de gestion: le cas des collectivités locales. Politiques et management public, 16(4), 1-18.
  74. Pires, A. (1997). Échantillonnage et recherche qualitative: essai théorique et méthodologique. La recherche qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques, 113-169.
  75. Parnell, J. A., & Hatem, T. (1999). Cultural antecedents of behavioural differences between American and Egyptian managers. Journal of Management Studies, 36(3), 398-418.
  76. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28.
  77. Schein, E. H. (1985). Defining organizational culture. Classics of organization theory, 3(1), 490-502.
  78. Seiler, R., & Bartlett, R. (1982). Personality variables as predictors of budget system characteristics. Accounting, Organization and Society, 7(4), 381-403.
  79. Shields, J., & Shields, M. (1998). Antecedents of participative budgeting. Accounting Organization and Society, 23(1), 49-76.
  80. Sofyani, H., Santo, M. F. I., Najda, T., & Almaghribi, M. S. (2020). The Role of Budgetary Participation and Environmental Uncertainty in Influencing Managerial Performance of Village Government. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 21(2), 258-276.
  81. Sponem, S. (2002, May). L'explication de la diversité des pratiques budgétaires: une approche contingente. In 23ème congrès de l'AFC (Association Francophone de Comptabilité) (pp. 1-23).
  82. Sponem, S., & Lambert, C. (2010). Budget practices, roles and criticisms of the budget: Perception of CFOs and controllers. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, 16(1), 159-194.
  83. Swieringa, R. J., & Moncur, R. H. (1975). Some effects of participative budgeting on managerial behavior. National Association of Accountants.
  84. Tsui, J. S. L. (2001). The impact of culture on the relationship between budgetary participation, management accounting systems and managerial performance: An analysis of Chinese and Western managers. The International Journal of Accounting, 36, 125-146.
  85. Wasti, S. A. (1998). Cultural barriers in the transferability of Japanese and American human resources practices to developing countries: The Turkish case. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4), 608-631.
  86. Widiawati, D., & RS, T. Y. (2019). Effect Of Budget Participation On Managerial Performance Mediated By Job Satisfaction And Organizational Commitment. Journal of Business Studies, 4(1), 54-66.
  87. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
  88. Yousfi, H. (2011). When American management system meets Tunisian culture: The Poulina case. In Cross-cultural management in practice. Edward Elgar.
  89. Zghal, R. (2008). Culture and management in Tunisia: congruence and resistance to change. Management in an intercultural context: approaches, issues, practices and dives. Presses de l'Université Laval et Télé-université (UQAM).
  90. Zonatto, V. C. D. S., Nascimento, J. C., Lunardi, M. A., & Degenhart, L. (2020). Effects of budgetary participation on managerial attitudes, satisfaction, and managerial performance. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 24(6), 532-549.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2449-8920
1643-5494
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ijcm-2021-0006
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu