BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Filipowicz Paweł (AGH University of Science and Technology)
Conceptualisation of Using Technical Debt to Measure the Innovation Level of New Product - Selected Issues
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska, 2021, z. 153, s. 89-101, bibliogr. 28 poz.
Tytuł własny numeru
Contemporary Management
Słowa kluczowe
Innowacyjność, Nowe technologie, Innowacje w produkcji, Cykl życia produktu
Innovative character, High-tech, Innovations in production, Product life cycle
Purpose: Conceptualisation of the technical debt use as the new product innovativeness measure. Design/methodology/approach: This paper adopts the J. Highsmith perspective on the technical debt as the essential of agile project management. The presented customer centered perspective of product value allows to use the technical debt as base for the new product innovativeness parametrization. The presented approach is possible also with the behavioral conception of innovativeness being directly associated with the subjective customer perception and works to build theory accordingly. The research is entirely theoretical and uses two points of reference. The first was used to explore the possible use of the technical debt as innovativeness measure through the use of user function. The second, consisting of presentation the possible modification of F. Sgobbi value model as the management tool for analyzing the value of new technology based product. Findings: The Concept of technical debt use as the measure of technology value is presented. Research limitations/implications: Future research sugestions will concerne the discretization of presented concept. Practical implications: The Presented conception may became the an interestning base for analyse and assesement of innovatives products and also in this way it can be used for new management tool designing, particulary in the domain of value based management process. Originality/value: Elaboration and operationalization of new technology based products model development with application of technology life cycle.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
  1. Akerlof, G.A., Shiller, R.J. (2017). Złowić frajera Ekonomia manipulacji i oszustwa. Warszawa: Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne.
  2. Alves, N., Mendes, Th., de Mendonca, M., Spinola, R., Shull, F., Seaman, C. (2016). Identification and management of technical debt: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, no. 70, pp. 100-121.
  3. Ampatzoglou, A., Chatzigeorgiou, A., Avgeriou, P. (2015). The financial aspect of managing technical debt: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 64, pp. 52-73.
  4. Artmann, C. (2009). The Value of Information Updating in New Product Development. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  5. Buchmann, J. (2015). Valuing the Innovation Potentials of Firms What Theory Suggests, Practitioners do, and both Implies for Existing Theory. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
  6. Codabux, Z., Williams, B.J., Bradshaw, G.L., Cantor, M. (2017). An empirical assessment of technical debt practices in industry. Journal of Software: Evolution Process, Vol. 29, no. 1894. pp. 1-32.
  7. Filipowicz, P. (2018). Use function and its technical debt as the foundation for modeling innovative products. Central and Eastern European Journal of Management and Economics, Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9-20.
  8. Filipowicz, P. (2019). New product conceptualization trough the technology based use function reconfiguration. International Journal of Innovation in Management, Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 81-87.
  9. Guo, Y., Seaman, C., da Silva, F. (2016). Costs and obstacles encountered in technical debt management - A case study. The Journal of Systems and Software, 120.
  10. Highsmith, J. (2009). Agile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products. USA: Addison-Wesley Professional.
  11. Kahneman, D. (2012). Pułapki myślenia. Poznań: Media Rodzina.
  12. Keinonen, T., Takala, R. (2006). Product Concept Design A Review of the Conceptual Design of Products in Industry. Germany: Springer Science + Business Media.
  13. Kraft, Ch. (2012). User Experience Innovation. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  14. Loch, Ch.H., Kavadias, S. (2008). Handbook of New Product Development Management. UK: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
  15. Magnusson, J., Bygstad, B. (2014). Technology Debt: Toward a New Theory of Technology Heritage. 22 European Conference on Information Systems, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  16. Malerba, F. (2006), Innovation and the evolution of industries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, no. 16, pp. 3-23.
  17. Martini, A., Bosch, J. (2017). On the interest of architectural technical debt: Uncovering the contagious debt phenomenon. Journal of Software Evolution Process, Vol. 29, no. 1877. pp. 1-18.
  18. McGregor, J.D., Monteith, J.Y., Zhang, J. (2012). Technical Debt Aggregation in Ecosystems. Joint Working Conference on Software Architecture & 6th European Conference on Software Architecture. USA: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 27-30.
  19. Mu, J., Di Benedetto, C.A. (2011). Strategic orientations and new product commercialization: mediator, moderator, and interplay. R&D Management, 41(4), pp. 337-359.
  20. Nord, R., Ozkaya, I., Kruchten, Ph., Gonzales-Rojas, M. (2012). In Search of a Metric for Managing Architectural Technical Debt. Joint Working Conference on Software Architecture & 6th European Conference on Software Architecture. USA: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 91-100.
  21. Petric, I.J., Echols, A.E. (2004). Technology roadmapping in review: A tool for making sustainable new product development decisions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, no. 71, pp. 81-100.
  22. Rampino, L. (2011).The Innovation Pyramid: A Categorization of the Innovation Phenomenon in the Product-design Field. International Journal of Design, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 3-16 (6-7 innnovation driven product designing process).
  23. Schultz, C., Salomo, S., Talke, K. (2013). Measuring New Product Portfolio Innovativeness: How Differences in Scale Width and Evaluator Perspectives Affect its Relationship with Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 30, no. S1, pp. 93-109.
  24. Schumpeter, J. (1960). Teorie rozwoju gospodarczego. Warszawa: PWN.
  25. Sgobbi, F. (1995). An integrated approach to the diffusion of technological innovation: the non-manufacturing advanced robotics field. Technovation, Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 11-24.
  26. Taura, T., Nagai, Y. (2017). Creativity in Innovation Design: the roles of intuition, synthesis, and hypothesis. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 5, no. 3-4, pp. 131-148.
  27. Vijay Kumar, V., Sundarraj, R.P. (2018). Global Innovation and Economic Value. India: Springer.
  28. Woodall, T. (2003). Conceptualising 'Value for the Customer': An Attributional, Structural and Dispositional Analysis. Academy of Marketing Science Review, no. 12, pp. 1-44
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu