BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Kabat-Rudnicka Danuta (Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie / Kolegium Ekonomii, Finansów i Prawa)
Tytuł
A Multi-Level Approach to Tackling the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic and Its Aftermath
Źródło
Zarządzanie Publiczne / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, 2020, nr 3 (53), s. 60-73, bibliogr. 62 poz.
Public Governance
Słowa kluczowe
COVID-19, Wielopoziomowe rządzenie, Koordynacja polityki, Sytuacje kryzysowe
COVID-19, Multilevel governance, Policy coordination, Crisis situations
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: K20, K32
summ.
Firma/Organizacja
Unia Europejska (UE)
European Union (EU)
Abstrakt
Objectives: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic brought about a new, difficult situation. The world, the international organisations-cum-regional integration arrangements, as well as, above all, individual states all had to cope with the difficult global situation. As for the European Union, neither the Union nor the Member States were prepared for such a challenge, which is why the responses were ad hoc and uncoordinated. The aim of this study is to identify the actors involved, the measures they employed, and the extent to which their reactions converged. Another objective is to answer the question about whether their actions fit into the concept of multi-level coordination-cum-multi-level governance.

Research Design & Methods: The methods used in this article are descriptive and interpretative as well as comparative. The descriptive method is applied in all these instances where actions taken by individual actors are discussed, while the interpretative method is employed when the reasons for taking particular measures are explained. In turn, the comparative approach is applied whenever measures taken by individual actors are juxtaposed. This analytical study also provides an overview of official documents along with the relevant literature.

Findings: In the face of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic - when imminent and consistent response is essential, and when there are many decision-making centres - it is measures taken at different levels and by various actors (but jointly coordinated) that can only bring the desirable results. The measures taken in the struggle against the pandemic and its consequences also prove that the EU's competences, albeit limited, do matter.

Implications / Recommendations: When the primary competence in the field of public health lies with the Member States and the EU can only support and complement state actions, then a permanent, institutionalised cooperation, one based on a multilateral agreement, is worth considering.

Contribution / Value Added: In the case of international and regional organisations, and those with a global reach, a major drawback is the lack of appropriate competences and instruments. In the EU, the lack of a systemic security mechanism anchored in the EU's law makes it act with delay. On the one hand, this study points to the shortcomings in legal solutions, but on the other, it demonstrates the importance of joint and coordinated actions. It also shows that competences of non-state actors do matter, too. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie
Biblioteka Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Alemanno, A. (2020). The European Response to COVID19: From Regulatory Emulation to Regulatory Coordination. EJRR, 11(2), 307-316.
  2. Antentas, J. M. (2020). Coronavirus: Notes on crisis, borders and the future of neoliberalism. Geographica Helvetica, 75(4), 431-436.
  3. Bache, I., Bartle, I., & Flinders, M. (2016). Multi-level governance. In Ch. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Multilevel governance: Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 486-498). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  4. Benz, A. (2007). Multilevel Governance. In A. Benz, S. Lütz, U. Schimank, & G. Simonis (Eds.), Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder (pp. 297-310). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  5. Benz, A. (2019). Conclusion: Governing Under the Condition of Complexity. In N. Behnke, J. Bro - schek, & J. Sonnicksen (Eds.), Configurations, Dynamics and Mechanisms of Multilevel Governance (pp. 387-409). Springer International Publishing.
  6. Carreño, I., Dolle, T., Brandenburger, M., & Medina, L. (2020). The implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on trade. EJRR, 11(2), 402-410.
  7. Dine, J. & Koutsias, M. (2013). The Nature of Corporate Governance: The Significance of National Cultural Identity. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  8. Dobbs, M. (2020). National Governance of Public Health Responses in a Pandemic? EJRR, 11(2), 240-248.
  9. Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. The American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233-243.
  10. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2010). Types of multi-level governance. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 17- 31). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  11. Micklitz, H.-W. (2020). The COVID-19 Threat: An Opportunity to Rethink the European Economic Constitution and European Private Law. EJRR, 11(2), 249-255.
  12. Morvillo, M. (2020). I Just Can't Get Enough (of Experts): The Numbers of COVID-19 and the Need for a European Approach to Testing. EJRR, 11(2), 366-374.
  13. Pacces, A. M. & Weimer, M. (2020). From diversity to coordination: A European approach to COVID-19. EJRR, 11(2), 283-296.
  14. Piattoni, S. (2010). The theory of multi-level governance: Conceptual, empirical, and normative challenges. Oxford University Press,
  15. Purnhagen, K. P., de Ruijter, A., Flear, M. L., Hervey, T. K., & Herwig, A. (2020). More Competences than You Knew? The Web of Health Competence for European Union Action in Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak, EJRR, 11(2), 297-306.
  16. Renda, A. & Castro, R. J. (2020). Towards Stronger EU Governance of Health Threats after the COVID-19 Pan demic. EJRR, 11(2), 273-282.
  17. Roloff, R. (2020). COVID-19 and No One's World: What Impact for the European Union? Connections QJ, 19(2), 25-36.
  18. Rudan, I. (2019). A cascade of causes that led to the COVID-19 tragedy in Italy and in other European Union countries. J Glob Health, 10(1), 1-10.
  19. Welsh, J. (2020). Struggling beyond the paradigm of Neoliberalism. Thesis Eleven, 158(1), 58-80.
  20. Zanin, G. M., Gentile, E., Parisi, A., & Spasiano, D. (2020). A Preliminary Evaluation of the Public Risk Perception Related to the COVID-19 Health Emergency in Italy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3024-3044.
  21. BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/08 the judgment of the Second Senate of 30 June, 2009.
  22. (a) Communication from the Commission Guidance from the European Commission on using the public pro curement framework in the emergency situation related to the COVID-19 crisis (OJ C 108I, 1.4.2020, pp. 1-5).
  23. (b) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council covid-19: Temporary Restriction on Non-Essential Travel to the EU (COM/2020/115 final).
  24. (c) Communication from the Commission COVID-19 Guidance on the implementation of the temporary restriction on non-essential travel to the EU, on the facilitation of transit arrangements for the repatriation of EU citizens, and on the effects on visa policy (OJ C 102I, 30.3.2020, pp. 3-11).
  25. (d) Communication from the Commission on the implementation of the Green Lanes under the Guidelines for border management measures to protect health and ensure the availability of goods and essential services (OJ C 96I, 24.3.2020, pp. 1-7).
  26. (e) Communication from the Commission Temporary Framework for State aid measures to support the economy in the current COVID-19 outbreak (OJ C 91I, 20.3.2020, pp. 1-9).
  27. (f) Communication from the Commission Amendment to the Temporary Framework for State aid measures to support the economy in the current COVID-19 outbreak (OJ C 112I, 4.4.2020, pp. 1-9).
  28. (a) Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2020/402 of 14 March 2020 making the exportation of certain products subject to the production of an export authorisation (OJ L 77I, 15.3.2020, pp. 1-7) no longer in force.
  29. (b) Commission Decision (EU) 2020/491 of 3 April 2020 on relief from import duties and VAT exemption on importation granted for goods needed to combat the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak during 2020 (OJ L 103I, 3.4.2020, pp. 1-3).
  30. Council Decision of 24 June 2014 on the arrangements for the implementation by the Union of the solidarity clause (OJ L 192, 1.7.2014, pp. 53-58).
  31. Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1993 of 11 December 2018 on the EU Integrated Poli - tical Crisis Response Arrangements (OJ L 320, 17.12.2018, pp. 28-34).
  32. Council Recommendation (EU) 2020/1475 of 13 October 2020 on a coordinated approach to the restriction of free movement in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (OJ L 337, 14.10.2020, pp. 3-9).
  33. COVID-19 response, Seventy-third world health assembly, WHA73.1, 19 May, 2020 (pp. 1-7).
  34. Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 1998 setting up a network for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases in the Community (OJ L 268, 3.10.1998, pp. 1-7).
  35. (a) Decision No 1082/2013/EU of the European Par liament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on serious cross-border threats to health and repealing Decision No 2119/98/EC (OJ L 293, 5.11.2013, pp. 1-15).
  36. (b) Decision No 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, pp. 924-947).
  37. Decision (EU) 2019/420 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2019 amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (OJ L 77I, 20.3.2019, pp. 1-15).
  38. (a) European Commission Decision of 16.3.2020 setting up the Commission's advisory panel on COVID-19, Brussels, 16.3.2020 C(2020) 1799 final.
  39. Guidelines for border management measures to protect health and ensure the availability of goods and essential services (OJ C 86I,16.3.2020, pp. 1-4).
  40. Joint European Roadmap towards lifting COVID-19 containment measures 2020/C 126/01 (OJ C 126, 17.4.2020, pp. 1-11).
  41. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013 and Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 as regards specific measures to mobilise investments in the health care systems of the Member States and in other sectors of their economies in response to the COVID-19 outbreak (COM/2020/113 final).
  42. Protecting humanity from future health crises. Report of the High-level Panel on the Global Response to Health Crises, 9 February, 2016 (A/70/723).
  43. Regulation (EC) No 851/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April, 2004, establishing a European Centre for disease prevention and control (OJ L 142, 30.4.2004, pp. 1-11).
  44. Regulation (EU) 2020/460 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 March, 2020, amending Regulations (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013 and (EU) No 508/2014 as regards specific measures to mobilise investments in the healthcare systems of Member States and in other sectors of their economies in response to the COVID-19 outbreak (Coronavirus Response Investment Initiative) (OJ L 99, 31.3.2020, pp. 5-8).
  45. (a) Resolution 74/274 adopted by the General Assembly on 20 April, 2020 (A/RES/74/274).
  46. (b) Resolution 2532 (2020) adopted by the Security Council on 1 July, 2020 (S/RES/2532 (2020)).
  47. Single European Act (OJ L 169, 29.6.1987). Treaties establishing the European Communities (1987). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Treaty on European Union (OJ C 191, 29.7.1992).
  48. Treaty on European Union and Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated version OJ C 202, 7.6.2016).
  49. A world at risk: Annual report on global preparedness for health emergencies, Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB), World Health Organization (WHO), September 2019; https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/ annual_report/GPMB_annualreport_2019.pdf. Communicable Disease Threats Report, Week 4, ECDC, 19-25 January 2020; https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/ en/publications-data/communicable-disease-threatsreport- 19-25-january-2020-week-4.
  50. DG Azevêdo requests WTO members to share information on trade measures related to COVID-19, 25 March, 2020; https://www.wto.org/english/ news_e/news20_e/dgra_24mar20_e.htm.
  51. (b) European solidarity in the face of COVID-19, 22 April, 2020; https://cy.ambafrance.org/Europeansolidarity- in-the-face-of-COVID-19.
  52. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Mitigating impacts of COVID-19 on food trade and markets, 31 March 2020; http://www.fao. org/news/story/en/item/1268719/icode.
  53. G20 Leaders' Statement, Extraordinary G20 Leaders' Summit Statement on COVID-19, 26 March, 2020; https://g20.org/en/media/Documents/G20_ Extraordinary G20 Leadersâ€% 99 Summit_Statement_EN (3).pdf.
  54. Janssen, D., Kucharczyk, M., & Pazura. N. (2020). Koronawirus: Protesty w Holandii przeciwko ograniczeniom społecznym, 6 May, 2020; https://www. euractiv.pl/section/bezpieczenstwo-i-obrona/news/ koronawirus-protest-haga-holandia-ograniczeniarestrykcje- lockdown-epidemia.
  55. Olofsdotter, K. (2020). Op-Ed: Sweden refused to impose a coronavirus lockdown. The country's ambassador explains why, Los Angeles Times, 2 May, 2020; https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-05-02/ sweden-coronavirus-voluntary-strategy.
  56. Revision of the International Health Regulations (2005); https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/ 10665/20353/WHA58_3-en.pdf?sequence= 1&isAllowed=y.
  57. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, UNDRR (2015); https://www.undrr. org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-riskreduction- 2015-2030.
  58. Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005). Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), Geneva, 30 January, 2020; https:// www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-01-2020-statement- on-the-second-meeting-of-the-internationalhealth- regulations-(2005)-emergency-committeeregarding- the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019- ncov).
  59. Using face masks in the community: Reducing COVID-19 transmission from potentially asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic people through the use of face masks, ECDC, Stockholm, 8 April, 2020; https:// www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/ COVID-19-use-face-masks-community.pdf.
  60. WCO-WTO Joint Statement on COVID-19 related trade measures, 6 April, 2020; http://www.wcoomd. org/en/media/newsroom/2020/april/wco-wto-jointstatement- on-covid-19-related-trade-measures.aspx.
  61. WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19, 11 March, 2020; https:// www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-directorgeneral- s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefingon- covid-19---11-march-2020.
  62. World Trade Organization, Trade in medical goods in the context of tackling COVID-19, 3 April, 2020; https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news20_e/ rese_03apr20_e.pdf.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1898-3529
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/ZP.2020.53.3.05
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu