- Autor
- Kamiński Włodzimierz (Maritime University in Szczecin, Poland)
- Tytuł
- Application of Risk Management in Day-to-day Operation of Sea-going Vessels
- Źródło
- Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska, 2022, z. 157, s. 207-221, bibliogr. 22 poz.
- Tytuł własny numeru
- Contemporary Management
- Słowa kluczowe
- Zarządzanie ryzykiem, Ocena ryzyka, Przedsiębiorstwo żeglugowe
Risk management, Risk assessment, Shipping company - Uwagi
- summ.
- Abstrakt
- Purpose: reasons for writing the paper is to present, the optimal procedure to manage of risk and Risk Assessment procedures on board sea-going vessels. Design/methodology/approach: an analysis of implemented Risk Assessment procedures on board sea-going vessels various shipping companies. Findings: found that approach to risk management and requirements to perform Risk Assessment are varied between shipping companies and sometime varied between vessels in the same shipping company. Research limitations/implications: management of risk based on Risk Assessment to be simplify and unified. Practical implications: suggestion is given to unify procedures for Risk Assessment. Social implications: reduction of risk to happen undesired events and mitigations of hazards associated with day to day operation of sea-going vessels. Originality/value: recommendation to shipping companies for modification of Risk Assessments procedures where is necessary to improve safety on board.(original abstract)
- Pełny tekst
- Pokaż
- Bibliografia
-
- Balmat, J.F., Lafont, F., Maifret, R., Pessel, N. (2009). Maritime Risk Assessment (MARISA), a fuzzy approach to define an individual ship risk factor Ocean. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 36(15-16). Elsevier, pp. 1278-1286.
- British Standards No. 4778. BS.
- Code of Safe Working Practices for Merchant Seamen (2000). MCA.
- Culp, S. (2020). Why Risk management is more important then ever. Forbs.
- Dominguez-Péry, C., Narasimha Raju Vuddaraju, C.L., Corbett-Etchevers, I. & Tassabehji, R. (2021). Reducing maritime accidents in ships by tackling human error: a bibliometric review and research agenda. Journal of Shipping and Trade, vol. 6, Art. no. 20. Springer.
- Embrechts, P., Frey, R., McNeil, A. (2005). Quantitative Risk management. Princeton University Press.
- Goerlandt, F., Montewka, J. (2015). Maritime transportation risk analysis: review and analysis in light of some foundational issues. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 138, Elsevier, pp. 115-134.
- Haugen, S., Ventikos, N., Teixeira, A., Montewka, J. (2016). Trends and needs for research in maritime risk. International Congress of the International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean. Taylor & Francis, pp. 313-321.
- ISM Code (1998). IMO.
- Montewka, J., Goerlandt, F., Kujala, P. (2014). On a systematic perspective on risk for formal safety assessment (FSA). Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 127. Elsevier, pp. 77-85.
- Kaplan, R.S., Mikes, A. (2012). Managing Risk: New Framework. Harvard Business Review.
- Puisa, R., McNay, J., Montewka, J. (2021). Maritime safety: prevention versus mitigation? Saf. Sci., 136. Elsevier, p. 105151.
- Risk Assessment Training Manual (2006). Lloyds Register of Shipping.
- Safety Management System, (2015). Shipping Company C (Europe).
- Safety Management System, (2017). Shipping Company D (Asia).
- Safety Management System, (2018). Shipping Company A (Europe).
- Safety Management System, (2020). Shipping Company B (Europe).
- Safety Management System, (2021). Shipping Company E (Asia).
- SOLAS Convention (1998). Gdańsk: PRS.
- Standard OHSAS 18001:2007.
- Tchankova, L. (2002). Risk identification - basic stage in risk management. Environmental Management and Health. Emerald.
- Zhang, S., Pedersen, P.T., Villavicencio, R. (2019). Probability and Mechanics of Ship Collision and Grounding. Butterworth-Heinemann.
- Cytowane przez
- ISSN
- 1641-3466
- Język
- eng
- URI / DOI
- http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.157.13
