BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Herman Sergiusz (Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu), Lach Bartłomiej (Analyx® sp. z o.o. sp. k.)
Tytuł
Skutki ekonomiczne restrykcyjnego lockdownu jako strategii walki z pandemią
Economic Effects of Restrictive Lockdown as a Strategy to Fight the Pandemic
Źródło
Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 2022, nr 4 (66), s. 71-86, tab., rys., bibliogr. 29 poz.
Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics
Słowa kluczowe
COVID-19, Pandemia, Ekonomia
COVID-19, Pandemic, Economics
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: E01, H6
streszcz., summ.
Projekt finansowany w ramach programu Ministra Edukacji i Nauki pod nazwą "Regionalna Inicjatywa Doskonałości" w latach 2019-2023. Numer projektu 004/RID/2018/19; kwota finansowania 3 000 000 zł.
Abstrakt
Pandemia COVID-19 ma ogromny wpływ na zdrowie publiczne na całym świecie. W celu ograniczenia rozwoju choroby w większości państw wprowadzono bardziej lub mniej restrykcyjne ograniczenia. Wiązały się one z ogromnymi kosztami ekonomicznymi oraz społecznymi. Zasadniczym celem artykułu jest zbadanie wpływu restrykcyjnego lockdownu na kondycję gospodarczą państwa. W tym celu w badaniu wykorzystano metodę syntetycznej kontroli. Analizę przeprowadzono z wykorzystaniem danych z baz Eurostat oraz OECD. Uzyskane wyniki pozwalają stwierdzić, iż decyzja o niewprowadzaniu restrykcyjnego lockdownu w Szwecji uchroniła gospodarkę tego kraju przed znaczącym pogorszeniem wskaźników związanych z deficytem i długiem publicznym. Jednocześnie taka polityka rządu nie spowodowała istotnych zmian w rozwoju gospodarczym kraju. Uzyskane wyniki są odporne na zmianę założeń przyjętych w badaniu.(abstrakt oryginalny)

COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on public health all over the world. In order to prevent the spread of COVID-19, the majority of countries introduced restrictions which resulted in enormous economic and social costs. The main goal of the article is to study the impact of the restrictive lockdown on the economic condition of the state. For this purpose, the synthetic control method was used. The analysis was carried out based on data from Eurostat and OECD. The obtained results allow us to conclude that the decision not to introduce a restrictive lockdown in Sweden saved the economy of this country against a significant deterioration of indicators related to the deficit and public debt. At the same time, such a government policy did not cause any significant changes in the economic development of the country. The results are resistant to the change of assumptions in the study.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Abadie, A. (2021). Using synthetic controls: Feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. Journal of Economic Literature, 59(2), 391-425. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191450
  2. Abadie, A., Diamond, A. i Hainmueller, A. J. (2010). Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California's Tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746
  3. Abadie, A. i Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque country. American Economic Review, 93(1), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455188
  4. Alfano, V., Ercolano, S. i Cicatiello, L. (2021). School openings and the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. A provincial-level analysis using the synthetic control method. Health Policy, 125(9), 1200-1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.06.010
  5. Born, B., Dietrich, A. M. i Müller, G. J. (2021). The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden. PLoS ONE, 16(4 April 2021), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249732
  6. Carvalho, M., Bandeira de Mello Delgado, D., de Lima, K. M., de Camargo Cancela, M., dos Siqueira, C. A. i de Souza, D. L. B. (2021). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Brazilian electricity consumption patterns. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(2), 3358-3364. https://doi. org/10.1002/er.5877
  7. Chernozhukov, V., Kasahara, H. i Schrimpf, P. (2021). Causal impact of masks, policies, behavior on early Covid-19 pandemic in the U.S. Journal of Econometrics, 220(1), 23-62. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.003
  8. Cho, S.-W. (Stanley). (2020). Quantifying the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 outbreak: The case of Sweden. The Econometrics Journal, 23(3), 323-344. https://doi. org/10.1093/ectj/utaa025
  9. Cihan, P. (2022). Impact of the COVID-19 lockdowns on electricity and natural gas consumption in the different industrial zones and forecasting consumption amounts: Turkey case study. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 134(July 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijepes.2021.107369
  10. Coccia, M. (2021). The relation between length of lockdown, numbers of infected people and deaths of Covid-19, and economic growth of countries: Lessons learned to cope with future pandemics similar to Covid-19 and to constrain the deterioration of economic system. Science of the Total Environment, 775. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145801
  11. Dang, H. A. H. i Trinh, T. A. (2021). Does the COVID-19 lockdown improve global air quality? New cross-national evidence on its unintended consequences. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 105, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102401
  12. Deng, T., Xu, T. i Lee, Y. J. (2022). Policy responses to COVID-19 and stock market reactions - An international evidence. Journal of Economics and Business, November. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jeconbus.2021.106043
  13. ECDC. (2022). Data on country response measures to COVID-19. Pobrane z https://www.ecdc.europa. eu/en/publications-data/download-data-response-measures-covid-19
  14. Fukase, Y., Ichikura, K., Murase, H. i Tagaya, H. (2022). Age-related differences in depressive symptoms and coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: A longitudinal study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110737
  15. Goodman-Bacon, A. i Marcus, J. (2020). Using difference-in-differences to identify causal effects of COVID-19 policies. Survey Research Methods, 14, 153-158. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020. v14i2.7723
  16. Huang, L., Xie, R. i Yang, G. (2022). The impact of lockdown on air pollution: Evidence from an instrument. China Economic Review, 71(September 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco. 2021.101731
  17. Kanitkar, T. (2020). The COVID-19 lockdown in India: Impacts on the economy and the power sector. Global Transitions, 2, 150-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.07.005
  18. Ke, X. i Hsiao, C. (2021). Economic impact of the most drastic lockdown during COVID-19 pandemic - The experience of Hubei, China. Journal of Applied Econometrics, March, 1-23. https://doi. org/10.1002/jae.2871
  19. Lai, S., Ruktanonchai, N. W., Zhou, L., Prosper, O., Luo, W., Floyd, J. R., Wesolowski, A., ... Tatem, A. J. (2020). Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain COVID-19 in China. Nature, 585(7825), 410-413. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2293-x
  20. Lee, J. i Yang, H. S. (2022). Pandemic and employment: Evidence from COVID-19 in South Korea. Journal of Asian Economics, 78(April 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101432
  21. Mitze, T., Kosfeld, R., Rode, J. i Wälde, K. (2020). Face masks considerably reduce COVID-19 cases in Germany. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(51), 32293-32301. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.2015954117
  22. Narayan, P. K., Phan, D. H. B. i Liu, G. (2021). COVID-19 lockdowns, stimulus packages, travel bans, and stock returns. Finance Research Letters, 38(August 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.frl.2020.101732
  23. Palomino, J. C., Rodríguez, J. G. i Sebastian, R. (2020). Wage inequality and poverty effects of lockdown and social distancing in Europe. European Economic Review, 129. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103564
  24. Tian, T., Tan, J., Luo, W., Jiang, Y., Chen, M., Yang, S., ... Wang, X. (2021). The effects of stringent and mild interventions for coronavirus pandemic. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116(534), 481-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2021.1897015
  25. WHO. (2022). Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports. Pobrane z https://www.who.int/ emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports/
  26. Wu, S., Yao, M., Deng, C., Marsiglia, F. F. i Duan, W. (2021). Social isolation and anxiety disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown in China. Journal of Affective Disorders, 294, 10- -16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.067
  27. Xu, L., You, D., Li, C., Zhang, X., Yang, R., Kang, C., ... Yang, J. (2022). Two-stage mental health survey of first-line medical staff after ending COVID-19 epidemic assistance and isolation. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 272(1), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406- 021-01239-x
  28. Zhang, H., Li, P., Zhang, Z., Li, W., Chen, J., Song, X., Shibasaki, R. i Yan, J. (2022). Epidemic versus economic performances of the COVID-19 lockdown: A big data driven analysis. Cities, 120(November 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103502
  29. Zhang, R., Li, Y., Zhang, A. L., Wang, Y. i Molina, M. J. (2020). Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(26), 14857 LP-14863. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009637117
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1899-3192
Język
pol
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15611/pn.2022.4.05
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu