BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Spałek Seweryn (Silesian University of Technology)
Tytuł
Project Management in Turbulent Times of Complexity of Social and Technological Systems
Źródło
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska, 2022, z. 161, s. 261-271, bibliogr. 65 poz.
Tytuł własny numeru
Contemporary Management
Słowa kluczowe
Zarządzanie projektem, Nowe technologie, Procesowe podejście do zarządzania, Niepewność
Project management, High-tech, Process-oriented approach, Uncertainty
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
Purpose: The aim of the article is a Viewpoint based on the General Review of the state of knowledge regarding current trends in project management, taking into account the high volatility of the environment and the increasing complexity of social and technological systems. Design/methodology/approach: The article presents a narrative review of the literature and refers to the results of the author's own research. Findings: With the increasing volatility of the environment and the increasing complexity of social and technological systems, the importance of using hybrid project management and the process approach to management in organisations will increase. Practical implications: Nowadays, a vast majority of organisations manage projects in a traditional way. Observations contained in the article will contribute to the potential attention of decision-makers and the implementation of new management methods in organisations. Social implications: Projects are not only inscribed in the activities of the organisation but also their results affect the quality of life of the population. By improving the efficiency of project management activities, it is possible to significantly affect the quality of people's lives. Originality/value: The article presents the significance of hybrid project management and the process approach in turbulent times of complexity of social and technological systems in a systematic and review way.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Ansari, R. (2019). Dynamic Simulation Model for Project Change-Management Policies: Engineering Project Case. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(7), 22.
  2. Antony, J., Lizarelli, F.L., Fernandes, M.M., Dempsey, M., Brennan, A., McFarlane, J. (2019). A study into the reasons for process improvement project failures: results from a pilot survey. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 36(10), 1699-1720.
  3. Boehm, B., Turner, R. (2005). Management challanges to implementing Agile Processes in traditional development organizations. IEEE Software, 22(5).
  4. Bordley, R.F., Keisler, J.M., Logan, T.M. (2019). Managing projects with uncertain deadlines. European Journal of Operational Research, 274(1), 291-302.
  5. Camison-Haba, S., Clemente-Almendros, J.A., Gonzalez-Cruz, T. (2019). How technology-based firms become also highly innovative firms? The role of knowledge, technological and managerial capabilities, and entrepreneurs' background. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(3), 162-170.
  6. Cohen, D., Lindvall, M., Costa, P. (2004). An introduction to agile methods. Advances in Computers, Vol. 62, iss. 62, 1-66.
  7. Conforto, E.C., Salum, F., Amaral, D.C., da Silva, S.L., de Almeida, L.F.M. (2014). Can Agile Project Management Be Adopted by Industries Other than Software Development? Project Management Journal, 45(3), 21-34.
  8. Crama, P., Sting, F.J., Wu, Y.Z. (2019). Encouraging Help Across Projects. Management Science, 65(3), 1408-1429.
  9. da Costa, J.M.H., Amaral, C.S.T., Fernandes, S.D., Rozenfeld, H. (2019). A new way to diagnose the new product development process based on recurring current reality trees. Business Process Management Journal, 25(4), 667-687.
  10. Davidson, E., Chiasson, M. (2005). Contextual influences on technology use mediation: a comparative analysis of electronic medical record systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 6-18.
  11. De Benedittis, J. (2019). Transition between temporary organizations: Dimensions enabling economies of recombination. International Journal of Project Management, 37(7), 912-929.
  12. Dolata, M. (2019). The sources of competitive advantage from the perspective of project management - results of empirical studies. Management-Poland, 23(1), 75-89.
  13. Gomes, F., Oliveira, M., Chaves, M.S. (2018). An analysis of the relationship between knowledge sharing and the project management process groups. Knowledge and Process Management, 25(3), 168-179.
  14. Jalocha, B. (2019). The European Union's multi-level impact on member state projectification in light of neoinstitutional theory. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(3), 578-601.
  15. Karlsson, B., Kurkkio, M., Hersinger, A. (2019). The role of the controller in strategic capital investment projects: bridging the gap of multiple topoi. Journal of Management & Governance, 23(3), 813-838.
  16. Katayama, E.T., Goldman, A. (2011). From Manufacture to Software Development: A Comparative Review. Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, 77, 88-101.
  17. Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  18. Kloppenborg, T.J., Tesch, D. (2015). How Executive Sponsors Influence Project Success. Mit Sloan Management Review, 56(3).
  19. Komus, A., Kuberg, M., Schmidt, S., Rost, L., Koch, C.-P., Bartnick, S. et al. (2020). Status Quo (Scaled) Agile 2019/20. 4th International Survey. Benefits and Challenges of (Scaled) Agile Approaches. Koblenz.
  20. Kotarbiński, T. (1999). Dzieła wszystkie. Prakseologia. Część 1. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk (Ossolineum).
  21. Kwak, Y.H., Anbari, F.T. (2009). Availability-Impact Analysis of Project Management Trends: Perspectives From Allied Disciplines. Project Management Journal, 40(2), 94-103.
  22. Li, C.L., Hall, N.G. (2019). Work Package Sizing and Project Performance. Operations Research, 67(1), 123-142.
  23. Liberatore, M.J., Pollack-Johnson, B. (2003). Factors influencing the usage and selection of project management software. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(2), 164-174.
  24. Marques, G., Gourc, D., Lauras, M. (2011). Multi-criteria performance analysis for decision making in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 29(8), 1057-1069.
  25. Martens, C.D.P., Franklin, J.M., Mauro, L.M., Silva, F., De Freitas, H.M.R. (2018). Linking entrepreneurial orientation to project success. International Journal of Project Management, 36(2), 255-266.
  26. Masciadra, E. (2017) Traditional Project Management, Vol. 5. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. Springer Nature, pp. 3-23.
  27. Maylor, H., Turkulainen, V. (2019). The concept of organisational projectification: past, present and beyond? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(3), 565-577.
  28. Midler, C. (2019). Projectification The forgotten variable in the internationalization of firms' innovation processes? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(3), 545-564.
  29. Nicholas, J., Steyn, H. (2017). Agile Project Management and Lean Project Management for Engineering, Business and Technology. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 453-480.
  30. Nogalski, B., Szpitter, A., Jabłoński, M. (2016). Zarządzanie projektami w kształtowaniu elastycznych modeli biznesu operatorów systemu dystrybucyjnego. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
  31. Nowosielski S. (ed.) (2009). Podejście procesowe w organizacjach, Vol. 52. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu.
  32. Pabian, A. (2017). Organizowanie jako funkcja zarządzania zrównoważonym przedsiębiorstwem przyszłości. Zarządzanie organizacją. Koncepcje. Wyzwania. Perspektywy. Częstochowa: Wydawnictwo Wydziału Zarządzania Politechniki Częstochowskiej.
  33. PMI (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Project Management Institute (PMI).
  34. Pollack, J., Helm, J., Adler, D. (2018). What is the Iron Triangle, and how has it changed? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(2), 527-547.
  35. PWN (1997-2019). Słownik języka polskiego PWN. Retrieved from https://sjp.pwn.pl/, 31.10.2019.
  36. Ramesh, G., Devadasan, S.R. (2007). Literature review on the agile manufacturing criteria. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18(2), 182-201.
  37. Roberts, D.L., Piller, F.T., & Luttgens, D. (2016). Mapping the Impact of Social Media for Innovation: The Role of Social Media in Explaining Innovation Performance in the PDMA Comparative Performance Assessment Study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(S1), 117-135.
  38. Rokita, J. (2009). Dynamika zarządzania organizacjami. Prace Naukowe, Akademia Ekonomiczna w Katowicach.
  39. Sambamurthy, V., Zmud, R.W. (1999). Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 261-290.
  40. Santos, R., Flentge, F., Begin, M.-E., Navarro, V. (2011). Agile Technical Management of Industrial Contracts: Scrum Development of Ground Segment Software at the European Space Agency. Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, 77.
  41. Saynisch, M. (2010). Mastering Complexity and Changes in Projects, Economy, and Society via Project Management Second Order (PM-2). Project Management Journal, 41(5), 4-20.
  42. Serrador, P., Pinto, J.K. (2015). Does Agile work? A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040-1051.
  43. Spalek, S. (2012). The role of project management office in the multi-project environment. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 12(2), 172-188.
  44. Spalek, S. (2013a). Dojrzałość przedsiębiorstwa w zarządzaniu projektami. Gliwice: Publishing house of the Silesian University of Technology.
  45. Spalek, S. (2013b). Improving Industrial Engineering Performance through a Successful Project Management Office. Engineering Economics, 24(2), 88-98.
  46. Spalek, S. (2013c). Rozwój metod i koncepcji w zarządzaniu projektami od lat 50. ubiegłego stulecia do dziś. In: A. Czech, A. Szplit (eds.), Nauki o zarządzaniu dla przedsiębiorstw i biznesu (pp. 593-603). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.
  47. Spalek, S. (2014). Does investment in project management pay off? Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(5), 832-856.
  48. Spalek, S. (2016a). Doskonalenie zarządzania projektami w przedsiębiorstwie. Management Forum, 4(2), 3-9.
  49. Spalek, S. (2016b). Traditional vs. Modern Project Management Methods. Theory and Practice. Smart and Efficient Economy: Preparation for the Future Innovative Economy, 499-506.
  50. Spalek, S. (2017). Zarządzanie projektami w erze przemysłu 4.0. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa, 9(812), 106-112.
  51. Tarraco, E.L., Bernardes, R.C., Borini, F.M., Rossetto, D.E. (2019). Innovation capabilities for global R&D projects in subsidiaries. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(4), 639-659.
  52. Thomke, S., Reinertsen, D. (1998). Agile product development: Managing development flexibility in uncertain environments. California Management Review, 41(1).
  53. Tiwana, A., McLean, E.R. (2005). Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 13-43.
  54. Toor, S.U.R., Ogunlana, S. O. (2010). Beyond the 'iron triangle': Stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(3), 228-236.
  55. Trocki, M., Bukłaha E. (ed.) (2016). Zarządzanie projektami - wyzwania i wyniki badań. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
  56. Trocki, M., Bukłaha, E., Grucza, B., Juchniewicz, M., Metelski, W., Wyrozębski, P. (2012). Nowoczesne zarządzanie projektami. Warszawa: PWE.
  57. Trocki, M. (2012a). Model procesowy projektów. In: M. Trocki (Ed.), Nowoczesne zarządzanie projektami (pp. 65-77). Warszawa: PWE.
  58. Trocki, M. (2012b). Wprowadzenie do zarządzania projektami. In: M. Trocki (Ed.), Nowoczesne zarządzanie projektami (p. 74). Warszawa: PWE.
  59. Trocki, M. (2018a). Project Governance - kształtowanie ładu projektowego organizacji. Studia i prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów SGH, 159, 9-25.
  60. Trocki, M. (2019a). Miejsce i rola projektów w zarządzaniu. In: M. Trocki (Ed.), Społeczna odpowiedzialność działalności projektowej (pp. 9-21). Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
  61. Wyrozębski, P. (2016). Zwinne modele zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem inteligentnym. In: S. Gregorczyk, W. Mierzejewska (Eds.), Zarządzanie przedsiębiorstwem inteligentnym. Wybrane zagadnienia. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
  62. Wyrozębski, P. (2017). Metodyka PMBoK Guide. In: M. Trocki (Ed.), Metodyki i standardy zarządzania projektami. Warszawa: PWE.
  63. Wysocki, R.K. (2011). Effective project management: traditional, agile, extreme. John Wiley & Sons.
  64. Yang, D.H., Chen, Y.F., An, Y.N., Cui, M.X. (2015). Evaluation of project communication management capability based on the Triangular Fuzzy Number. Advances in Energy Science and Equipment Engineering, 1715-1718.
  65. Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A. (2013). Zasobowe uwarunkowania koopetycji w przedsię-biorstwach high-tech. Przegląd Organizacji, 2, 3-8.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1641-3466
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.161.18
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu