BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Jendza Dorota (University of Gdansk)
Tytuł
The Phenomenon of Passivity in Public and Business Organisations
Źródło
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska, 2022, z. 163, s. 169-184, bibliogr. 31 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Zachowania organizacyjne, Organizacje publiczne, Przywództwo
Organisational behaviour, Public organisations, Leadership
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
Purpose: To show the differences between public and business organisations in passive organisational behaviour and to identify the reasons for this behaviour. Design/methodology/approach: The research was conducted among employees of public and business organisations in various organisational roles. A total of 497 people took part. It was conducted according to a symbolic-interpretative approach, using survey questionnaires containing two open-ended questions. Semantic field analysis was used to structure the content, which allowed the main research categories to be distinguished. The phenomenon of passivity is one of the identified organisational behaviours. Findings: There is value in identifying differences between public and business organisations in the area of organisational passivity, which justifies the need to look at these organisations differently when making changes to organisational behaviour. The underlying phenomenon of passivity are the different motives of the participants in these organisations. In business organisations, passivity is a manifestation of disagreement with the treatment in question and a lack of acquiescence to the organisational system in place. In public organisations, it is the result of a sense of lack of agency, a subjective approach to the employee and seeing oneself as a helpless and powerless individual. Knowing how to interpret organisational reality and organisational roles makes it possible to influence organisational motives and behaviour more effectively. At the same time, it emphasises the validity of influencing passivity in a different way, which should depend on the type of organisation. Research limitations/implications: inability to fully objectify the research results obtained. Practical implications: The results obtained improve the understanding of organisational passivity. Knowledge of the causes of this phenomenon allows us to influence organisational behaviour more effectively by shaping organisational conditions that support activity and offset organisational passivity. Originality/value: The originality of this article lies in combining the cognitive aspect of the individual with the organisational behaviour undertaken. In the methodological area, the qualitative aspect (open-ended questions) was also combined with the quantitative aspect. The use in the qualitative study of a tool that is typical of a quantitative approach allowed a larger number of statements to be obtained, which far exceeded the possibilities of a study using standard qualitative methods. This, in turn, made it possible to show the relationship between organisational type, organisational role, seniority and cognitive dimension and the phenomenon of organisational inactivity.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Avolio, B.J. (2011). Full range leadership development. Thousand oaks: Sage publications.
  2. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, Vol. 52, p. 14.
  3. Baron, S.J.F. (2013). Inaction speaks louder than words: the problems of passivity. Business horizons, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 301-311.
  4. Bass, B.M. (1998). Transformational leadership: industrial military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. Bass, B.M., Bass, R. (2008). The bass handbook of leadership: theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Free Press.
  6. Bass, B.M., Stogdill, R.M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: theory, research, and managerial applications. NY: Simon and Schuster.
  7. Boyne, G.A. (2002). Public and private management: what's the difference? Journal of Management Studies, vol. 39, no. 1.
  8. Briker, R., Walter, F., Cole, M.S. (2020). The consequences of (not) seeing eye-to-eye about the past: the role of supervisor-team fit in past temporal focus for supervisors' leadership behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 244-262.
  9. Farnham, D., Horton, S. (1996). Public managers and private managers: towards a professional synthesis? In: D. Farnham, S. Horton, J. Barlow, A. Hondeghem (eds.), New public managers in Europe. Public servants in transition (p. 31). London: Macmillan Business ltd.
  10. Grant, A.M., Gino, F., Hofmann, D.A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: the role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 528-550.
  11. Hancock, A.J., Gellatly, I.R., Walsh, M.M., Arnold, K.A., Connelly, C.E. (2021). Good, bad, and ugly leadership patterns: implications for followers' work-related and context-free outcomes. Journal of Management, Vol. 21.
  12. Hinkin, T.R., Schriesheim, C.A. (2008). A theoretical and empirical examination of the transactional and non-leadership dimensions of the multifactor leadership questionnaire. The leadership quarterly, Vol. 19, pp. 501-513.
  13. Iman, A.H.M., Douglas, M.U., Ali, H.M. (2015). Company's performance self-assessment (copsa) among facilities outsourcing firms in Malaysia: a focus on service delivery. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 283-296.
  14. Judge, T.A., Piccolo, R.F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, pp. 755-768.
  15. Khan, A.K., Quratulain, S., Crawshaw, J.R. (2013). The mediating role of discrete emotions in the relationship between injustice and counterproductive work behaviours: A study in Pakistan. Journal of Business and Psychology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 49-61.
  16. Nutt, P., Backoff, R. (1993). Organisational publicness and its implications for strategic management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 3.
  17. Obuchowski, K. (1983). Psychology of human striving. Warsaw: Zysk i S-ka, pp. 34-35.
  18. Poznaniak, W. (1999). O niektórych przyczynach i mechanizmach bierności społecznej. In: H. Sęk, S. Kowalik (ed.), Psychologiczny kontekst problemów społecznych (p. 90), Poznań.
  19. Rainey, H.G., Pandey, S., Bozeman, B. (1995). Research note: public and private managers' perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, Vol. 55.
  20. Robert, V., Vandenberghe, C. (2021). Laissez-faire leadership and affective commitment: the roles of leader-member exchange and subordinate relational self-concept. Journal of Business and Psychology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 533-551.
  21. Ropo, A., Hoykinpuro, R. (2017). Narrating organizational spaces. Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 357-366.
  22. Russell, S., Brannan, M.J. (2016). Deregulation is so nineteen eighties, we're into 'better regulation' now exploring the unintended consequences of self-regulation through enterprise in the passive fire protection industry. Journal of organizational ethnography, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 287-303.
  23. Skogstad, A., Einarsen, S., Torsheim, T., Aasland, M.S., Hetland, H. (2007). The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behaviour. Journal of occupational health psychology, Vol. 12, pp. 80-92.
  24. Skogstad, A., Hetland, J., Glasø, L., Einarsen, S. (2014). Is avoidant leadership a root cause of subordinate stress? Longitudinal relationships between laissez-faire leadership and role ambiguity. Work & stress, Vol. 28, pp. 323-341.
  25. Van Marrewijk, A., Van den Ende, L. (2018). Changing academic work places: the introduction of open-plan offices in universities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1119-1137.
  26. Voitenko, E., Myronets, S., Osodlo, V., Kushnirenko, K., Kalenychenko, R. (2021). Influence of emotional burnout on coping behavior in pedagogical activity. International Journal of organizational leadership, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 183-196.
  27. Vullinghs, J.T., De Hoogh, A.H.B., Den Hartog, D.N., Boon, C. (2020). Ethical and passive leadership and their joint relationships with burnout via role clarity and role overload. Journal of business ethics, vol. 165, no. 4, pp. 719-733.
  28. Yammarino, F.J., Spangler, W.D., Bass, B.M. (1993). Transformational leadership and performance: a longitudinal investigation. The leadership quarterly, Vol. 4, pp. 81-102.
  29. Yukl, G., O'donnell, M., Taber, T. (2009). Influence of leader behaviors on the leader-member exchange relationship. Journal of managerial psychology, Vol. 24, pp. 289-299.
  30. Zheng, X., Zhu, W., Yu, H., Zhang, X., Zhang, L. (2011). Ethical leadership in Chinese organizations: developing a scale. Frontiers of business research in China, pp. 179-198.
  31. Ziółkowski M. (2015). Sociological theory and the transformation of Polish society. Warsaw, p. 128.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1641-3466
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.163.9
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu