BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Werner-Lewandowska Karolina (Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, Poznań, Poland), Kolinski Adam (Poznan School of Logistics , Poznań, Poland), Golinska-Dawson Paulina (Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, Poznań, Poland)
Barriers to Electronic Data Exchange in the Supply Chain - Results from Empirical Study
LogForum, 2023, vol. 19, nr 1, s. 127-139, rys., tab., bibliogr. poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Logistyka, Łańcuch dostaw
Logistics, Supply chain
Background: The purpose of this article is to present the results of a study on barriers to data exchange in supply chains between logistics service providers (3PL and 4PL) and their customers in Poland. The study investigates two research hypotheses regarding the relationships between the size of a company and the role of a logistics service provider in the electronic data exchange between their business partners. Methodology: Bayesian ordinal regression was used to assess the reliability of the research hypotheses. The study used survey data from a population of 78 logistics service providers operating in Poland. Feedback was received from 51 respondents. Originality of the presented research results from the applied research method, Bayesian ordinal regression, rarely used in economic sciences to assess the reliability of research hypotheses concerning the determination of determinants of the studied phenomenon. The defined research hypotheses represent an important contribution to the research on communication in supply chains. Results: The results indicate that the level of the employment and the role of logistics service provider in a supply chain do not determine the extent of problems in electronic communication between the logistics operator and customers(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
  1. Angeles R., Corritore C. L., Basu S. C., and Nath R., 2001. Success factors for domestic and international electronic data interchange EDI implementation for US firms. International Journal of Information Management, 215, 329-347. 4012(01)00028-7
  2. Bahija J., Malika E., and Mostapha A., 2016. Electronic Data Interchange In The Automotive Industry In Morocco: Toward The Optimization Of Logistics Information Flows. European Scientific Journal, 123, 186-196. 186
  3. Balakrishnan N., Basu A., 1996, The Exponential Distribution: Theory, Methods, and Applications, Gordon and Breach, New York.
  4. Bernardes J. P. F., and Miyake M. Y., 2016. Script to Support Maintenance and Project of EDI Systems between Vendors and Customers in Brazil. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 145, 2470-2478.
  5. Blakely B. E., Pawar P., Jololian L. and Prabhaker S., 2021, The Convergence of EDI, Blockchain, and Big Data in Health Care, SoutheastCon 2021, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2021, pp. 1-5, .2021.9401897
  6. Bürkner, P. C. 2017. brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of statistical software, 801.
  7. Cichosz, M. 2018. Digitalization and competitiveness in the logistics service industry. e-mentor, 5 77, 73-82.
  8. Collins B. S., 1993, Risk assessment for EDI implementation. Computer Audit Update, 194, 13-17.
  9. Combe C., 2006. Introduction to E-business - managment and strategy, First edition, Elsevier Ltd., Oxford 2006. %20Elektronike/Introduction%20to%20e Business%20Management%20and%20Strat egy.pdf
  10. Debicki T, Kolinski A 2018 Influence Of EDI approach for complexity of information flow in global supply chains. Bus Logistics Mod Manage 18:683-694.
  11. Domanski, R., and Kolinski, A. 2020. Assessment Of The Level Of Information Integration in CRM Systems for SMEs for the needs of omnichannel retailing. Business Logistics in Modern Management, 197-214.
  12. EuroStat 2019, t_statistics#EU_road_freight_transport_con tinues_to_grow
  13. Golinska, P., and Hajdul, M. 2011. Multi-agent coordination mechanism of virtual supply chain. In KES International Symposium on Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications pp. 620-629. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  14. Golinska-Dawson, P., Werner-Lewandowska, K., Kolinska, K., & Kolinski, A. (2023). Impact of Market Drivers on the Digital Maturity of Logistics Processes in a Supply Chain. Sustainability, 15(4), 3120.
  15. GS1 2018,
  16. Godziewska-Nowicka A,Janicki T., 2019. igital economy as a strategy of economic development in the 21st century, Torun Business Review (18)1 2019 34-44,
  17. Hadas, L., Cyplik, P., Adamczak, M., Domanski, . 2015. Dimensions for developing supply chain integration scenarios. Business Logistics in Modern Management, 15, 225-239
  18. Horzela A., Kolinski A., Domanski R., Osmolski . 2018. Analysis Of Use Of Communication Standards On The Implementation Of Distribution Processes In Fourth Party Logistics 4PL. Business Logistics in Modern Management, 18, 299- 315.
  19. Kawa A. 2012. SMART logistics chain. In Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems. Springer, BerlinHeidelberg, pp. 432-438.Kolinski A., Werner-Lewandowska K. 2021. Determinants of the Use of Logistic Labels by 3PL and 4PL Operators - Results of Studies in Poland, European Research Studies Journal Volume XXIV Issue 2B, 871-881. 28487-8_45
  20. Kawa A., Zdrenka W., 2016, Conception of integrator in cross-border ecommerce. LogForum 12 (1), 63-73.
  21. Kim B. G., and Lee S., 2008. Factors affecting he implementation of electronic data interchange in Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 242, 263-283.
  22. Klein S., 1995. The impact of public policy on he diffusion and implementation of EDI: An evaluation of the TEDIS programme. Information Economics and Policy, 72, 147- 181. 6245(94)00039-9
  23. Kmiecik,M., 2023, Supporting of manufacturer's demand plans as an element of logistics coordination in the distribution network. Production Engineering Archives, 29(1) 69-82.
  24. Krajka M., Cyplik P., Adamczak M., 2022. The impact of blockchain technology on operational and strategic risks in the supply chain - a systematic literature review. LogForum 18 (3), 365-377,
  25. Lee S., and Han I., 2000. The impact of organizational contexts on EDI controls. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13, 153-177. 0895(00)00008-7
  26. Leuschner R., D. Rogers, F.F. Charvet. 2013. "A meta-analysis of supply chain integration and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 34-57.
  27. Lee S., Lee K., and Kang I. W. 2005. Efficiency analysis of controls in EDI applications. Information and Management, 423, 425- 439.
  28. Laage-Hellman J., and Gadde L. E., 1996. Information technology and the efficiency of materials supply: The implementation of EDI in the Swedish construction industry. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 24, 221-228.and firm performance". Journal of Supply Chain Management 49 2: 34-57. 7012(96)00018-4
  29. McLaren T., Head M., and Yuan Y. 2002. Supply chain collaboration alternatives: understanding the expected costs and benefits. Internet research, 124, 348-364. 6
  30. Moberg C. R., Cutler B. D., Gross A., and Speh T. W. 2002. Identifying antecedents of information exchange within supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 329, 755-770. 1
  31. Nurmilaakso J. M., and Kotinurmi P. 2004. A review of XML-based supply-chain integration. Production Planning and Control, 156, 608-621. 3937
  32. Okano M. T., Vendrametto O., Simões E., Fernandes M. E., 2017. Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXXI, Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, 6, 528-533.
  33. Prajogo D., J. Olhager. 2012. "Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration". International Journal of Production Economics 135 1 : 514-522.
  34. Sassi, R. J., Arrivabene, A., and Romero, M. 2011, May. Zero Latency applied on a commercial Data Mart: Real-time information in support of decision making. In 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks pp. 219-223. IEEE. 79
  35. Speier C., D. Mollenkopf, T.P Stank. 2008."The Role of Information Integration in Facilitating 21st Century Supply Chains: A Theory-Based Perspective". Transportation Journal 47 2 : 21-38.
  36. Szopa Ł., Cyplik P., 2020. The concept of building a digital transformation model for enterprises from the SME sector - case study. LogForum 16 (4), 593-601.
  37. Trojanowska, J., Varela, M.L.R., Machado, J. 2017. The Tool Supporting Decision Making Process in Area of Job-Shop Scheduling, in: Rocha, Á., Correia, A., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S. eds. Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies, WorldCIST, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 571, 490-498. 3-319-56541-5_50
  38. Wang C., Ahmed P., 2007. Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda, The International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 1, 31-51. 2370.2007.00201.x
  39. Werner-Lewandowska K., Kosacka-Olejnik M. 2020, Dojrzałość logistyczna przedsiębiorstw usługowych, Spatium, Radom.
  40. Werner-Lewandowska, K.; Golinska-Dawson, P. 2021. Sustainable Logistics Management Maturity-The Theoretical Assessment Framework and Empirical Results from Poland. Sustainability. 13(9), 5102. Tang, C. S., and Veelenturf, L. P. 2019. The strategic role of logistics in the industry 4.0 era. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 129, 1-11.
  41. Zhou W., Chong A. Y. L., Zhen C., and Bao H., 2018. E-supply chain integration adoption: examination of buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 581, 58-65. 9304
  42. NACE Rev. 2 Statistical classification of economic activites in the European Community, ISSN 1977-0375, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2008
Cytowane przez
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu