BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Wiśniewska Magdalena (University of Lodz, Poland)
Tytuł
Regional Dimensions of Public Value of Academic Spin-offs
Źródło
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska, 2022, z. 163, s. 699-714, bibliogr. 35 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Spin-off, Uniwersytet, Zarządzanie wartością, Teoria interesu publicznego, Rozwój lokalny
Spin-off, University, Value management, Public interest theory, Local development
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
Purpose: The paper aims at conceptualizing the measurement of the impact of academic spin-offs on the region. Design/methodology/approach: For the purpose of the paper, the desk method was implied. Necessary literature review was presented in the field of public value, Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) and necessary economic theories on the relationship between human activity and the environment. A set of indicators was presented as an effect of the desk research. Findings: Public value concept as well as RRI are useful approaches to assess the impact of academic spin-offs through a set of metrics which should be implemented by HEIs in innovation strategies. For the proper assessment of the impact, two scopes of the impact were adopted: direct and indirect. The sets of proposed indicators are presented in three dimensions: social, economic and environmental. Research limitations/implications: Further conceptualization is needed to elaborate more adequate and complete system of planning and monitoring R&D and commercialization activity of higher education institutions (HEIs). Practical implications: Presented indicators can and should be incorporated in HEI's innovation strategies to properly plan and control undertaken activities in research and innovation processes. On the planning stage, metrics should be helpful in shaping the research process to achieve publicly valuable results as broadly as possible. Observing the state of a region can also help HEIs to answer most important public issues. In monitoring and control, HEIs can assess their impact on society, economy and environment while fulfilling third mission of contemporary university. Social implications: Understanding the impact of HEIs activities resulting in enterprises creation and possibility to shape such creation with accordance to public value concept and RRI it is possible to focus on research and innovation valuable for the society in long term. Originality/value: Paper adopts already known concept of public value for the purpose of university research and innovation processes.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Blaug, R., Horner, L., Kenyon, A., Lekhi, R. (2006). Public Value and Local Communities. A Literature Review. London: The Work Foundation.
  2. Botterman, M., Miiard, J., Horlings, E., van Oranje, C., van Deelen, M., Pedersen, K. (2008). Wartość dla obywateli. Wizja zarządzania publicznego w 2020 roku. Raport Samorządowej Komisji Europejskiej (2020). Rotterdam.
  3. Bozeman, B. (2007). Public Values and Public Interest. Counterbalancing Economic Individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  4. Cheng Hui, Wang Bei (2019). Multiplier Effect of Science and Technology Innovation in Regional Economic Development Based on Panel Data of Coastal Cities, Journ.al of Coastal Research, pp. 883-890. Available at: https://search-1ebscohost-1com-10ao1bjws02ca.han3.lib.uni.lodz.pl/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.26854067&lang=pl&site=eds-live. 15.06.2022.
  5. Coats, D., Passmore, E. (2008). Public Value - The Next Steps in Public Service Reform. London: The Work Foundation.
  6. Deloitte Business Consulting S.A. and Łódzka Agencja Rozwoju Regionalnego S.A. (2013). Regionalna Strategia Innowacji dla Województwa Łódzkiego LORIS 2030, https://rpo.lodzkie.pl/images/prawo-i-dokumenty/RSILORIS2030final1.pdf. 12.07.2022.
  7. European Commission (2021) Performance, monitoring and evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the Just Transition Fund in 2021-2027, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/performance 2127/performance2127_swd.pdf. 12.07.2022.
  8. European Parliament(2017), .Research for REGI Committee - Indicators in Cohesion Policy, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/601976/IPOL_STU (2017)601976_EN.pdf, 10.07.2022.
  9. European Union (2010). Making sustainable production a reality. A guide for business and policy makers to Life Cycle Thinking and Assessment. Luxembourg: European Union, https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/LCT-Making-sustainable-consumption-and-production-a-reality-A-guide-for-business-and-policy-makers-to-Life-Cycle-Thinking-and-Assessment.pdf.
  10. Eurostat (2021). EGDP at regional level, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=GDP_at_regional_level#Gross_domestic_product_.28GDP.29, 20.06.2022.
  11. Hołuj, A. (2021). Externalities in the Light of Selected Spatial Economy Issues - Contribution to the Discussion. European Research Studies Journal, Vol. XXIV, Iss. 1, pp. 3-21.
  12. Howard, J. (2005). The Emerging Business of Knowledge Transfer. Creating values from intellectual products and services, Australian Government. Department of Education. Science and Training, http://www.howardpartners.com.au/publications/Howard_ Partners_Business_of_Knowledge_Transfer_Report.pdf, 14.06.2022.
  13. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_13_1085.
  14. Iacobucci, D., Micozzi, A. (2015). How to evaluate the impact of academic spin-offs on local development: an empirical analysis of the Italian case. The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 40(3), pp. 434-452. Springer.
  15. International NGO Training and Research Centre (INTRAC) (2017). Outputs, Outcomes, and Impact, https://www.intrac.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Outputs-outcomes-and-impact.pdf, 10.06.2022.
  16. Jonkers, K. et al. (2018). A Regional Innovation Impact Assessment Framework for universities, EUR 28927 EN. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  17. Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., Muers, S. (2002). Creating Public Value. An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform. Discussion paper prepared by the Cabinet Office Strategy Unit, United Kingdom.
  18. Mahdon, M. (2006). Public Value and Health. London: The Work Foundation.
  19. Matusiak, K.B. (2020).Budowa powiązań nauki z biznesem w gospodarce opartej na wiedzy. Rola i miejsce uniwersytetu w procesach innowacyjnych. Warsaw:. SGH.
  20. Meynhardt, T. (2012). Public Value - Turning a Conceptual Framework into a Scorecard. Paper submitted for the Conference. Creating Public Value in a Multi-Sector. Shared-Power World, Minneapolis on September 20-22.
  21. Meynhardt, T., Gomez, P., Schweizer, M. (2014). The Public Value Scorecard: what makes an organization valuable to society? Performance, 6(1), 2-9.
  22. Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  23. Moore, M. (2003). The Public Value Scorecard. A Rejoinder and an Alternative to 'Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Non-Profit Organizations' by Robert Kaplan. Working Paper #18. Boston: Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
  24. Moretti, E. (2010). Local Multipliers. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 100(2),1-7.
  25. O'Flynn, J., Alford, J. (2009). Making sense of public value: concepts, critiques and emergent meanings. International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 32, no. 3-4, 171-191.
  26. OECD (2021). Households with broadband access (indicator), https://doi.org/10.1787/f9b84af5-en, 02 November 2021.
  27. Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., Guston, D. (2013). A framework for responsible innovation. Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, 31, 27-50.
  28. Science Foundation Ireland and Economic and Social Research Council, https://www.sfi.ie/funding/award-management/research-impact/.
  29. Stevens, B., Lahr, M. (1988) Regional Economic Multipliers: Definition, Measurement, and Application. Economic Development Quarterly - ECON. DEV. Q., 2, 88-96.
  30. Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management. A New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41-57.
  31. Talbot, C. (2011). Paradoxes and Prospects of 'Public Value'. Public Money and Management, 31(1), 27-34.
  32. UN OHCHR (2020). Article 27-Illustrative indicators on work and employment-Human rights indicators on the CRPD, https://bridgingthegap-project.eu/crpd-indicators/.
  33. Urząd Marszałkowski Województwa Mazowieckiego (2019). Monitoring wskaźników dla celu głównego, celów strategicznych i celów operacyjnych Regionalnej Strategii Innowacji dla Mazowsza do 2020 roku w kontekście inteligentnych specjalizacji, https://innowacyjni.mazovia.pl/upload/pages/1744/1744-0.pdf, 10.07.2022.
  34. Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible research and innovation. Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, 51-74.
  35. Wiśniewska, M. (2018) Wartość publiczna i zarządzanie wartością publiczną. Samorząd Terytorialny, nr 3.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1641-3466
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.163.43
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu