BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Przybylska-Czajkowska Barbara (Silesian University of Technology)
Tytuł
Introductory Remarks on Axiology of Technology
Źródło
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska, 2022, z. 165, s. 285-295, bibliogr. 25 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Ontologia, Aksjologia, Filozofia, Technologia
Ontology, Axiology, Philosophy, Technology
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
Purpose: The main goal of the paper is to present an initial version of possibly comprehensive and detailed axiological fundamentals for the Technology Assessment. Design/methodology/approach: The paper can be placed in the tradition of the analytic philosophy - historically (in the sense of history of technology) informed. Findings: A classification of values relevant for technology-assessment has been constructed. A certain number of instances have been given for each values-group. Research limitations/implications: The analysis carried out in this text presents the results of the first stage of the technological-axiological studies. They should be widened (many relevant values have not been even mentioned) and analytically developed (more precise descriptions should be given). Practical implications: The axiology-of-technology investigations, even in its present form, can be useful for all institutions and organizations active in the domain of technology assessment and in related fields (in particular: technology policy and management). Social implications: The analyses presented in this text could make the public debates on technology more nuanced and less ideological. They should help overcoming the schematic opposition of techno-optimism and techno-pessimism. Originality/value: The paper seems to start from where many other works end: The general thesis about "saturation" technology with values has been soundly substantiated and can be regarded as well-founded. It is time to make further steps - toward systematic and detailed axiology of technology. This text seems to be one of the first steps in this direction.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Abney, K. (2022). Outer Space as a New Frontier for Technology Ethics. In: S. Vallor (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology (pp. 535-461). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Alexander, J.K. (2009). The Concept of Efficiency: An Historical Analysis. In: A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (pp. 1007-1030). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  3. Brey, P. (2022). Understanding Engineering Design and Its Social, Political, and Moral Dimensions. In: S. Vallor (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology (pp. 395-416). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Briggle, A. (2022). Philosophy of Technology as Politics. In: S. Vallor (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology (pp. 191-210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Ciążela, H. (2006). Problemy i dylematy etyki odpowiedzialności globalnej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. M. Grzegorzewskiej.
  6. Czajkowski, W. (2022). Introductory remarks on ontology of technology.
  7. Dietrych, J. (1985). System i konstrukcja. Warszawa: WNT.
  8. Ess, Ch. (2022). Toward an Existential and Emancipatory Ethics of Technology. In: S. Vallor (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology (pp. 588-608). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Fransseen, M. (2009). Artefacts and Normativity. In: A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (pp. 923-952). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  10. Grunwald, A. (2009). Technology Assessment: Concepts and Methods. In: A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (pp. 1103-1146). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  11. Hitachi-U Tokyo Laboratory (2020). Society 5.0. A People-centric Super-smart Society. Springer Open.
  12. Johnson, D. (2022). Emerging Technology as Promise and Perils. In: S. Vallor (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology (pp. 647-662). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Kiepas, A. (2017). Filozofia techniki w dobie nowych mediów. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
  14. Kroes, P. (2009). Foundational Issues of Engineering Design. In: A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (pp. 513-542). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  15. Kuenkel, P. (2019). Stewarding Sustainability Transformation. An Emerging Theory and Practice of SDG Implementation. Cham: Springer.
  16. Kuzior, A (2014). Aksjologia zrównoważonego rozwoju. Banska Bystrica: Belianum.
  17. Kuzior, A., Kiepas, A., Leks-Bujak, E. (2012). Zrównoważony rozwój. Zabrze: M-Studio.
  18. Lizut, R.A. (2014). Technika a wartości. Spór o aksjologiczną neutralność artefaktów. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Academicon.
  19. Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking Trough Technology. The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  20. Mitcham, C., Briggle, A. (2009). The Interaction of Ethics and Technology in Historical Perspective. In: A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (pp. 1147-1193). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  21. Poel van de, I. (2009). Values in Engineering Design. In: A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (pp. 973-1006). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  22. Radder, H. (2009). Why Technologies are Inherently Normative In: A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (pp. 887-922). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  23. Rapp, F. (1981). Analytical Philosophy of Technology Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
  24. Vallor, S. (2022). Introducing the Philosophy of Technology. In: S. Vallor (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology (pp. 1-16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. Vermaas, P.E. (2022). Evaluation, Validation, and Management in Design. In: S. Vallor, (Ed.), Philosophy of Technology (pp. 434-448). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1641-3466
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.165.21
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu