BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Siegel Lukáš (Bratislava International School of Liberal Arts (BISLA))
Tytuł
How to Care? An Analysis of the Contemporary Social Issues Through the Lens of Care Ethics
Źródło
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska, 2022, z. 165, s. 297-306, bibliogr. 27 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Etyka, Ochrona praw człowieka, Filozofia, Wykluczenie społeczne, Polityka społeczna
Ethics, Human rights protection, Philosophy, Social exclusion, Societal policy
Uwagi
summ.
Abstrakt
Purpose: This article aims to analyze the ethics of care and how it can help mitigate some of the negative impacts of social risks for vulnerable groups. Design/methodology/approach: We analyze various books, documents and academic articles that provide essential information about care ethics, autonomy, justice, dignity, human rights, socially excluded groups and social risks. Overall, we aim to identify how the ethics of care can help prevent and protect the socially excluded from the negative impacts of social risks and contemporary issues. Findings: Our article found that care ethics provides significant benefits while formulating policies for socially excluded and vulnerable groups such as people with disabilities. We have also identified several factors while care ethics provides original inputs for the new and reformulated social policies. Research limitations/implications: The future research could expend on the ability of care ethics to introduce the concept of vulnerability in a specific policies aimed at improving living conditions, overall quality of life, upholding of human rights and dignity. Social implications: We hope our article will impact political laws, support vulnerable groups, and help reduce discrimination against people with disabilities. Our paper should support the debate about broader consideration of dependency and vulnerability within social policies. Originality/value: We have analyzed a significant theory that deals with vulnerable groups in society and places value on relationships and the dependency of all human beings. Our analysis tries to bring in the vulnerability of all human beings and how we should consider that while formulating any kind of governmental policy.(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Barchielli, B., Cricenti, C., Gallè, F., Gallè F., Sabella, E.A., Liguori, F., Da Molin, G., Liguori, G., Orsi, G.B., Giannini, A.M., Ferracuti, S.,Napoli, Ch. (2022). Climate Changes, Natural Resources Depletion, COVID-19 Pandemic, and Russian-Ukrainian War: What Is the Impact on Habits Change and Mental Health? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 11929.
  2. Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J., Piachaud, D. (2002). Degrees of Exclusion: Developing a Dynamic, Multidimensional Measure. In: J. Hills et al., Understanding Social Exclusion (pp. 30-43). Oxford University Press.
  3. Davy, L. (2019). Between an Ethic of Care and an Ethic of Autonomy. Angelaki - Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, Vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 101-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 0969725X.2019.1620461.
  4. Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: The MIT Press. ISBN: 978-0-745-61160-0.
  5. Keller, J. (2007). Teorie modernizace. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  6. Keller, J. (2011). Nová sociální rizika a proč se jim nevyhneme. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  7. Kittay, F.E. (1999). Love´s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York-London: Routledge. ISBN: 9781138089921.
  8. Kittay, F.E. (2011). The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability. Ratio Juris, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 49-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x.
  9. Kuzior, A. (2021). Applied Ethics. Lublin: Tygiel.
  10. Kuzior, A. (2019). Model inkluzywny zrównoważonego rozwoju społecznego. In: T. Sedová (ed.). Ľudské práva osôb so zdravotným postihnutím: Od ideí k realite. Banská Bystrica: Veda.
  11. Kuzior, A., Ober, J., Karwot, J. (2022). Employee Attitudes towards Employee Evaluation Systems in the Utility Sector: A Case Study of Sewage and Water Supply Ltd., Rybnik, Poland. Sustainability, 14(19), 12436.
  12. Kuzior, A., Kashcha, M., Kuzmenko, O., Lyeonov, S., Brożek, P. (2022). Public Health System Economic Efficiency and COVID-19 Resilience: Frontier DEA Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14727. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214727.
  13. Kuzior, A., Mańka-Szulik, M., Marszałek-Kotzur, I. (2021). The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the economic and psychological condition of individuals and societies. Proceedings of the 37th International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA). Khalid S. Soliman (Ed.), pp. 8129-8135.
  14. Leget, C. (2012). Analyzing dignity: a perspective from the ethics of care. Med Health Care and Philos., vol. 16, pp. 945-952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-012-9427-3.
  15. Levitas, R., Pantazis, Ch., Fahmy, E., Gordon, D., Lloyd, E., Patsios, D. (2007). The Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Social Exclusion (Report). Bristol: University of Bristol.
  16. Mackenzie, C. (2014). The Importance of Relational Autonomy and Capabilities for an Ethics of Vulnerability. In: C.W. Mackenzie, S. Rogers, S. Dodds (eds.), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy (pp. 33-59). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0-19-931664-9.
  17. Menke, Ch. (2017). Ľudská dôstojnosť. In: A. Pollmann, G. Lohmann (eds.), Ľudské práva: Interdisciplinárna príručka (pp. 170-177). Bratislava: Kalligram. ISBN: 978-80-8101- 960-9.
  18. Nussbaum, C.M. (2007). Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  19. Nussbaum, C.M. (2011). Capabilities, Entitlements, Rights: Supplementation and Critique. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 23-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2011.541731.
  20. Nussbaum, C.M. (2011). Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  21. Palovičová, Z. (2017). Typológia a Charakteristika Ľudských práv. Filozofické Aspekty. In: Globalne Konteksty Poszanowania Praw Wolności Czlowieka Aktualne problemy. Zabrze: Katedra Stosowanych Nauk Spolecznych Wdzial Organizacji i Zarzadzania Politechnika Ślaska (pp. 165-175).
  22. Persons with disabilities (n.d.). European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1137&langId=en.
  23. Sen, A. (2000). Social Exclusion: Concept, Application, and Scrutiny. Social Development Papers, No. 1. Asian Development Bank, pp. 1-54. ISBN: 971-561-274-1.
  24. Sen, A. (2010). The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Books. ISBN: 978-0-141-03785-1.
  25. Social exclusion (n.d.) World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/social_determinants/themes/socialexclusion/en/.
  26. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (n.d.). United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.
  27. Wyttenbach, J. (2017). Sociálne zabezpečenie. In: A. Pollmann, G. Lohmann (eds.), Ľudské práva. Interdisciplinárna príručka (pp. 332-335). Bratislava: Kalligram. ISBN: 978-80-8101-960-9.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1641-3466
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.165.22
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu