BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Szopiński Tomasz (University of Economics and Human Sciences, Poland)
Tytuł
University Students` Attitude to E-learning in the Post-COVID-19 Era
Źródło
Contemporary Economics, 2023, vol. 17, nr 3, s. 311-322, tab., bibliogr. 43 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Zdalne nauczanie, Szkolnictwo wyższe, Nauczanie hybrydowe, COVID-19
e-learning, Higher education, Blended learning, COVID-19
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: D12, I23.
summ.
Abstrakt
The study addresses the issue of students' attitudes toward remote learning in a post-COVID-19 reality. It presents the results of a survey conducted in 2023 among students of a Polish university offering online and blended approaches. The analysis of the survey reveals that variables, such as the field of study, the mode of study, the age of the students, and their professional activity, differentiate the frequency of participation in online classes and attitudes towards remote learning. The most conscientious participants in remote classes are part-time students, those working full-time, and those enrolled in legal, political and philological studies. Remote classes were rated highest by students of computer science. In contrast, psychology students and students from the youngest age group were the least active students. Psychology students also rated remote learning the lowest. Respondents' nationality did not differentiate students' attitudes toward remote learning or the frequency of participation. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Alam, G. M., & Parvin, M. (2021). Can online higher education be an active agent for change? comparison of academic success and job-readiness before and during COVID-19. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121008
  2. Aleksander, T. (2006). Motywy kontynuowania nauki na studiach zaocznych. [Motivations for pursuing distance learning]. In T. Aleksander (Ed.), Teoretyczne i praktyczne aspekty edukacji kulturalnej oraz oświaty dorosłych (pp. 153-172). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  3. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
  4. Alghamdi, A., Karpinski, A. C., Lepp, A., & Barkley, J. (2020). Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.018
  5. Antonowicz, D., Kwiek, M., Westerheijden, D. F. (2017). The government response to the private sector expansion in Poland. In H. de Boer, J. File, J. Huisman, M. Seeber, M. Vukasovic, & D. F Westerheijden (Eds.), Policy analysis of structural reforms in higher education. Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education (pp. 119-138). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42237-4_6
  6. Azmi, F. M., Khan, H. N. & Azmi, A. M. (2022). The impact of virtual learning on students' educational behavior and pervasiveness of depression among university students due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Global Health, 18(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00863-z
  7. Batorski, D. (2015a). Technologies and media in households and lives of Poles. Social Diagnosis 2015, the objective and subjective quality of life in Poland. Contemporary Economics, 9(4), 367-389. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.192
  8. Batorski, D. (2015b). Household living conditions. Influence of new technologies on the labour market - user status and technological unemployment. Social Diagnosis 2015, the objective and subjective quality of life in Poland. Contemporary Economics, 9(4), 178-191. https://doi.org/1010.5709/ce.1897-9254.189
  9. Bouchrika, I. (2023, January 11). 50 Online education statistics: 2023 data on higher learning & Corporate training. https://research.com/education/online-education-statistics#TOC2
  10. Central Statistical Office of Poland (15.06.2022). Higher education in the 2021/2022 academic year (preliminary data). https://stat.gov.pl/download/gfx/portalinformacyjny/en/defaultaktualnosci/3306/10/8/1/higher_education_in_the_2021-2022_academic_yearpreliminary_data.pdf
  11. Chandra, S., Ranjan, A., & Chowdhary, N. (2022). Online Hospitality and Tourism Education: Issues and Challenges. Tourism 70(2), 298-316. https://doi.org/10.37741/t.70.2.10
  12. Chorab, M. (2016). Funkcjonowanie studentów we współczesnej rzeczywistości Uniwersyteckiej [Students and their behavior in the current university reality]. Pedagogika Szkoły Wyższej, 2, 127-142. https://doi.org/10.18276/psw.2016.2-10
  13. Clayton, K. E., Blumberg, F. C., & Anthony, J. A. (2018). Linkages between course status, perceived course value, and students' preferences for traditional versus non-traditional learning environments. Computers & Education, 125, 175-181.
  14. Clickmeeting (June, 2020). Webinary i wideokonferencje w czasach pandemii. Raport Clickmeeting. [Webinars and video conferencing in times of pandemic. Clickmeeting report]. https://knowledge.clickmeeting.com/uploads/2020/06/cm-covid-2020-report_PL.pdf
  15. Ćwiertniak, R., Stach, P., Kowalska-Jarnot, K., Worytkiewicz-Raś, K., Wachułka-Kościuszko, B. (2022). Addressing students' perceived value with the virtual university concept. E-mentor, 2, 65-76. https://doi.org/10.15219/em94.1565
  16. Dobbins, M., & Knill, C. (2009). Higher education policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Convergence toward a common model? Governance, 22(3), 397-430.
  17. Estrada, M. A. R. (2021). How COVID-19 quarantine(s) can generate poverty? Contemporary Economics, 15(3), 332-338. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.453
  18. Gajderowicz, T., Grotkowska, G., Giergiczny, M., Czajkowski, M., & Mycielski, J. (2015, April 30). Preferencje młodzieży względem usług edukacyjnych na poziomie wyższym [Young people's preferences towards higher education services. In G. Grotkowska U. Sztanderska (Eds.), Społeczne i ekonomiczne uwarunkowania wyborów osób w wieku 19-30 lat dotyczących studiowania (pp. 43-122). University of Warsaw. https://produkty.ibe.edu.pl/docs/raporty/ibe-ee-raport-spol-i-ekon-uwar-wyb-19-30.pdf
  19. Gallego Sánchez, M. del C., De-Pablos-Heredero, C., Medina-Merodio, J.-A., Robina-Ramírez, R., & Fernandez-Sanz, L. (2021). Relationships among relational coordination dimensions: Impact on the quality of education online with a structural equations model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120608
  20. Gamage, K. A. A., Gamage, A., & Dehideniya, S. C. P. (2022). Online and hybrid teaching and learning: enhance effective student engagement and experience. Education Sciences, 12, 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100651
  21. Gheshlagh, R.G., Ahsan, M., Jafari, M., & Mahmoodi, H. (2022). Identifying the challenges of online education from the perspective of University of Medical Sciences Students in the COVID-19 pandemic: a Q-methodology-based study. BMC Medical Education, 22, 895. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03980-w
  22. Ignaciuk, E., & Gutowski, T. (2022). Studiowanie w warunkach pandemii SARS-CoV-2 - wady i zalety oczami studentów Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego [Studying under the conditions of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic - disadvantages and advantages from the perspective of students at the University of Gdansk], Teoria i Praktyka Dydaktyki Akademickiej, 1, 1-27.
  23. Jaworek, M. A. (2021). The effects of temper traits and study method (full-time vs. extramural) on Polish students' adaptability to online learning as a result of COVID-19. A pilot study. Sustainability, 13, 14017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132414017
  24. Kaewsaiha, P., & Chanchalor, S. (2021). Factors affecting the usage of learning management systems in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 2919-2939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10374-2
  25. Kapera, I. (2017). Motives and expectations of students from Ukraine with respect to higher education in Poland in the field of tourism. Tourism, 27(1), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.18778/0867-5856.27.1.10
  26. Kumar, P., Kumar, A., Palvia, S. & Verma, S. (2019). Online business education research: Systematic analysis and a conceptual model. The International Journal of Management Education, 17, 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.11.002
  27. Küçük, M. (2010). Lurking in online asynchronous discussion. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2260-2263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.319
  28. Kwiek, N., & Szadkowski, K. (2018). Higher education systems and institutions, Poland. In P. N. Teixeira, J. C. Shin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions (pp.1-9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1
  29. Lamanauskas, V., & Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, R. (2021). Distance Lectures in university studies: Advantages, disadvantages, improvement. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), ep309. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10887
  30. Lemay, D. J., Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2021). Transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100130
  31. Muflih, S., Abuhammad, S., Al-Azzam, S., Alzoubi, K. H., Muflih, M., & Karasneh, R. (2021). Online learning for undergraduate health professional education during COVID-19: Jordanian medical students' attitudes and perceptions. Heliyon, 7(9), e08031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08031
  32. Myszka-Strychalska, L. (2022). Pokolenie koronawirusa jako spuścizna po pandemii COVID-19(?) -próba charakterystyki [Coronavirus Generation as a legacy from the COVID-19 disease pandemic(?) - an attempt to characterize]. Podstawy Edukacji. Na jakie ważne dziś pytania szukamy odpowiedzi? [Fundamentals of education. What essential questions are we trying to answer nowadays?], 15, 161-186. https://doi.org/10.16926/pe.2022.15.12
  33. Okano, M. T., dos Santos, H. C. L., Ursini, E. L., Fernandes, M. E., & Gomes, J. G. C. (2023). Open and Distance Learning (ODL): Traditional or frugal innovation? Contemporary Economics, 17(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.497
  34. Paudel, P. (2021). Online education: Benefits, challenges and strategies during and after COVID-19 in higher education. International Journal on Studies in Education (IJonSE), 3(2), 70-85.
  35. Ruthotto, I., Kreth, Q., Melkers, J., Stevens, J., & Clare, T. (2020). Lurking and participation in the virtual classroom: The effects of gender, race, and age among graduate students in computer science. Computers & Education, 151, 103854. http s : / / d oi. org / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j.compedu.2020.103854
  36. Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2019). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144,103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
  37. Romaniuk, M. W., & Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, J. (2021). Zdalna edukacja kryzysowa w APS w okresie pandemii COVID-19 Z perspektywy rocznych doświadczeń [Remote crisis education in APS report during the COVID-19 pandemic, yearly experience] Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. Marii Grzegorzewskiej. http://www.aps.edu.pl/media/2392732/raport-z-badania-zdalna-edukacja-kryzysowa-w-aps-w-okresie-pandemii-covid-19.pdf
  38. Stecuła, K., & Wolniak, R. (2022). Advantages and disadvantages of e-learning onnovations during COVID-19 pandemic in higher education in Poland. Journal of Open Innovation. Technology, Market and Complexity, 8(3), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030159
  39. Szopiński, T., & Bachnik, K. (2022). Student evaluation of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121203
  40. Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sport Sciences, 21, 19-25.
  41. Yang, M. Y., Jong, M. S., Lau, W. W., Meng, Y., Chai, C., & Chen, M. (2021). Validating the general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning: Evidence from an online English as a foreign language course amid COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671615
  42. Zhang, Q., Yuan, Q., Z., Ma, P. Q., Li, Y., Zhao, M. H., Chen, R. X., ... & Li, F. F. (2023). Perceptions towards online learning among medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic, Heliyon, 9(2), e13119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13119
  43. Zheng, M., Bender, D. & Lyon, C. (2021). Online learning during COVID-19 produced equivalent or better student course performance as compared with pre-pandemic: empirical evidence from a school-wide comparative study. BMC Medical Education, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02909-z
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2084-0845
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.512
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu