BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Streimikiene Dalia (Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania)
Tytuł
Transformative Changes Towards Carbon Neutral Society: Barriers and Drivers
Źródło
Contemporary Economics, 2023, vol. 17, nr 3, s. 351-360, tab., bibliogr. 44 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Zmiany klimatyczne, Polityka ekologiczna, Emisja gazów
Climate change, Ecological politics, Gas emissions
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: H30, P18, Q20, Q30.
summ.
Abstrakt
The barriers of climate change mitigation and mechanisms to overcome these barriers and achieve transformative changes towards carbon neutral society need to be investigated in order to define the main drivers and barriers of transformative change towards carbon neutrality and how policies and measures can be developed to overcome barriers and to support drivers. The main drivers of transformative change that include various types of institutions including social norms and rules, governance schemes, cultural values, demographic, social, economic, technical and technological elements are analysed and systematized based on literature review. Transformative change towards carbon neutral society necessitates systematic changes as simple scaling-up is not enough. These important roles are the levers or main pathways for achieving transformative change towards a carbon neutral society. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Baker, S. E., Cain, R., Kesteren, F. V., Zommers Z. A. D., Cruze, N., & MacDonald D. W. (2013). Rough trade: Animal welfare in the global wildlife trade, Bioscience, 63(12), 928-938. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio. 2013.63.12.6.
  2. Bako, E. D., Rus, A. V., Rovinaru, M. D., Varvari, S. A. D., Rovinaru, F. I., & Negrut, L. (2022). Climate change approach in EU countries vs economic development, Transformations in Business & Economics, 21(56A), 707-726.
  3. Brand, U. (2016). Transformation' as a new critical orthodoxy: the strategic use of the term 'transformation' does not prevent multiple crises. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(1), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.1.7
  4. Biesta, G. J. J. (2016). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy.: Routledge.
  5. Bodin. O. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems, Science. 18, 357(6352), eaan1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114.
  6. Brondfzio, E. S., Diaz, S., Settele, J., Ngo, H. T., Guėze, M., Aumeeruddy- Thomas, Y., Jaureguiberry, J. (2019). Chapter 1: Introduction to and rationale of the global assessment. In E.S. Brondfzio, J. Settele, S. Diaz, & H. T. Ngo (Eds.), Global assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831853.
  7. Chan, K. M. A., Boyd, D. R., Gould, R. K., Jetzkowitz, J., Liu, J., Muraca, B., Naidoo, R., Olmsted, P., Satterfield, T., Selomane, O., Singh, G. G., Sumaila, R., Ngo, H. T., Boedhihartono, A. K., Agard, H.,... Brondizio, E. S. (2020). Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability. People and Nature. 2(3), 693- 717. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10124
  8. Chan, K. M. A., Agard, J., Liu, J., de Aguiar, A. P. D., Armenteras, D., Boedhihartono, A. K., Cheung, W. M. L., Hashimoto, S., Hernandez-Pedraza, G. C., Hickler, T., Jetzkowitz, J., Kok, M., Murray-Hudson, M. A., O'Farrell, P., Satterfield, T., Saysel, A. K., Seppelt, R., Strassburg, B., Xue, D., Selomane, O., Balint, L., & Mohamed, A. A. A. (2019). Pathways towards a sustainable future. In E. S. Brondfzio, J. Settele, S. Diaz, & H. Ngo (Eds.), Global assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3832100
  9. Chan, K. M. A., Anderson, E., Chapman, M., Jespersen, K., & Olmsted, P. (2017). Payments for ecosystem services: Rife with problems and potential- For transformation towards sustainability. Ecological Economics, 140, 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.029
  10. Constantino, S. M., Sparkman, G., Kraft-Todd, G. T., Bicchieri, C., Centola, D., Shell-Duncan, B., Vogt, S., & Weber, E. U. (2022). Scaling up change: A Critical review and practical guide to harnessing social norms for climate action. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 23(2), 50-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006221105279.
  11. Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondizio, E. S., Ngo, H. T., Agard, J., Arneth, A., Balvanera, P., Brauman, K. A., Butchart, S. H. M., Chan, K. M. A., Garibaldi, L. A., Ichii, K., Liu, J., Subramanian, S. M., Midgley, G. F., Miloslavich, P., Molnár, Z., Obura, D., Pfaff, A., . . . Zayas, C. N. (2019). Pervasive humandriven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science, 366(6471), eaax3100. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100
  12. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441-473. http://www.annualrevi ews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.14451.
  13. Fazey, I., Moug, P., Allen, S. J., Beckmann, K., Blackwood, D. J., Bonaventura, M., Burnett, K., Danson, M., Falconer, R. E., Gagnon, A. S., Harkness, R., Hodgson, A., Holm, L., Irvine, K. N., Low, R., Lyon, C. J., Moss, A., Moran, C., Naylor, L. A., . . . Wolstenholme, R. (2017). Transformation in a changing climate: A research agenda. Climate and Development, 10(3), 197-217. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301864
  14. Geels, F.W., Schot. J. (2010). Introduction: Exploration of the research topic. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change (pp. 11-17). Routledge.
  15. Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66 (4), 290-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566
  16. Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J. M., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Transition versus transformation: what's the difference? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007
  17. Klain, S. C., Olmsted, P., Chan, K. M., & Satterfield, T. (2017). Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the New Ecological Paradigm. PloS one, 12(8), e0183962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0183962
  18. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman. J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro environmental behavior? Environ Education Research, 8(3), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  19. Kuenkel, P. (2019). Stewarding sustainability transformations: an emerging theory and practice of SDG implementation. Springer.
  20. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
  21. Larson, L. R., Stedman, R. C., Cooper, C. B., & Decker, D. J. (2015). Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of environmental psychology, 43, 112-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.004
  22. Linnér, B. O., & Wibeck, V. (2020). Conceptualising variations in societal transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Science & Policy, 106, 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.01.007
  23. Linnér, B. O., & Wibeck, V. (2021). Drivers of sustainability transformations: leverage points, contexts and conjunctures. Sustainability Science, 16, 889-900. doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00957-.
  24. Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
  25. Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 599-626. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/ abs/10.1146/ annurev-environ-102014-021340.
  26. Loorbach, D., van Bakel, J. C., Whiteman, G., & Rotmans, J. (2010). Business strategies for transitions towards sustainable systems, Business Strategy and the Environment 19(2), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
  27. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global environmental change, 17(3-4), 445-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2007.01.004
  28. Lu, J., Ren, L., Yao, S., Rong, D., Skare, M., & Streimikis, J. (2020). Renewable energy barriers and coping strategies: Evidence from the Baltic States. Sustainable Development, 28(1), 352-367. https:// doi.org/10.1002/sd.2030.
  29. Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing Company.
  30. Meadows, D. H. (2009). Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system. Solutions 1(1), 41-49. http://thesolutionsjournal.anu.edu.au/node/419.
  31. Naito, R., Zhao, J., & Chan, K. M. (2022). An integrative framework for transformative social change: a case in global wildlife trade. Sustainability Science, 17(1), 171-189. doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021- 01081-z.
  32. Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., & Visbeck, M. (2016). Policy: Map the interactions between sustainable development goals. Nature, 534(7607), 320-322. https://doi.org/10.1038/534320a
  33. O'Brien, K. (2015). Political agency: The key to tackling climate change. Science 350(6265), 1170- 1171. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad0267
  34. O'Brien, K. (2018). Is the 1.5 C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cosust.2018.04.010
  35. Patterson, J., Schulz, K., Vervoort, J., van der Hel, S., Widerberg, O., Adler, C., Hurlbert, M., Anderton, K., Sethi, M., & Barau, A. (2017). Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1-16. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001
  36. Raza, W., Saula, H., Islam, S. U., Ayub, M., Saleem, M., & Raza, N. (2015). Renewable energy resources: Current status and barriers in their adaptation for Pakistan. Journal of Bioprocessing and Chemical Engineering, 3(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ sd.2030
  37. Reijula S., Kuorikoski J., Ehrig T., Katsikopoulos K., & Sunder S. (2018). Nudge, boost, or design? Limitations of behaviorally informed policy under social interaction. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 2(1), 99-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.2685912
  38. Seetharaman, Moorthy, K., Patwa, N., Saravan, & Gupta, Y. (2019). Breaking barriers in deployment of renewable energy. Heliyon, 5(1), 1-23. doi. org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01166.
  39. Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., Stokes, E. C., Unruh, G., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2016). Carbon lock-in: Types, causes, and policy implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 425-452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934
  40. Sovacool, B. J., & Griffiths, S. (2020). The cultural barriers to a low-carbon future: A review of six mobility and energy transitions across 28 countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119, 109569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rser.2019.109569.
  41. Stren, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. https://doi. org/10.1007/BF00640994.
  42. Stern, P.C., Doherty, T.J., Clayton, S., Reser, J.P., Weber, E.U., & Howard, G. S. (2011). Psychology contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 241-250. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1037/ a0023220.
  43. Winkler, H., Lecocq, F., Lofgren, H., Vilarino, M. V., Kartha, S., Portugal-Pereira, J. (2022). Examples of shifting development pathways: Lessons on how to enable broader, deeper, and faster climate action. Climate Action, 1(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s44168-022-000261
  44. Zhang, N., Ding, W. (2022). Influencing paths of China's financial investment in science and technology on low-carbon economic transformation. Transformations in Business & Economics, 21(56A), 630-657.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2300-8814
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.515
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu