BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Siwiec Dominika (Rzeszow University of Technology), Pacana Andrzej (Rzeszow University of Technology), Simková Zuzana (Technical University of Košice, Slovakia), Metszősy Gabriella (University of Miskolc, Hungary), Vozňáková Iveta (Pan-European University, Faculty of Entrepreneurship and Law, Ostrava, Czech Republic)
Tytuł
Current Activities for Quality and Natural Environment Taken by Selected Enterprises Belonging to Smes from the Electromechanical Industry
Źródło
Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska, 2023, z. 172, s. 537-553, rys., tab., bibliogr. 22 poz.
Tytuł własny numeru
Współczesne zarządzanie = Contemporary Management
Słowa kluczowe
Rozwój zrównoważony, Środowisko przyrodnicze, Podejmowanie decyzji, Małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa
Sustainable development, Natural environment, Decision making, Small business
Uwagi
summ.
Firma/Organizacja
Grupa Wyszehradzka
Visegrad Group
Abstrakt

Purpose: The purpose of the article is to present results of pilot studies from survey research of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) from the electromechanical industry of the countries of the Visegrad Group, i.e.: Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary. Design/methodology/approach: As subject of research selected SMEs from electromechanical industry. Survey research was quantitative in nature. They were conducted in a written and electronic way using the MS FORMS platform.

Findings: In recent years, issues related to nature protection have become more and more priority for small and medium enterprises from the electromechanical industry of Visegrad countries. This is mainly due to the updated way of managing organisations and the increasing emphasis on the use of sustainable development tools. This pressure is exerted by competition but also by customers. It turned out that today it is not enough to ensure high quality of products, but in order to achieve the basic goals of the organisation, it is also necessary to invest in sustainable development. However, there is resistance in this area, related to awareness and costs.

Research limitations/implications: The article included initial research. In the future, the next research is planned in this area.

Originality/value: The article presented an analysis of the pilot survey research of approach to quality and environmental issues in SMEs. The article refers to enterprises from one industry, i.e.: the electromechanical industry of Visegrad Group - Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary. The conclusions from the research are important for national SMEs and organisations that support the development of this sector.

(original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Benito-Hernandez, S., López-Cózar-Navarro, C., Priede-Bergamini, T. (2023). The influence of government support over environmental protection investment on SMEs: R&D collaboration and financial aspects. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32, 836-846. doi: 10.1111/beer.12496.
  2. Braun, M. (2019). Postfunctionalism, Identity and the Visegrad Group. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(4), 925-940. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12994.
  3. Bryła, P. (2020). Znaczenie marki na rynku ekologicznych produktów żywnościowych. In: T. Domański (ed.), Strategie budowania marki i rozwoju handlu. Nowe trendy i wyzwania dla marketingu (pp. 30-58). doi: 10.18778/8142-903-0.03.
  4. Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M., Bełch, P., Siwiec, D., Bednarova, L., Pacana, A. (2022). Instruments used to improve the betterment of products quality. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 157, 157-171. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.157.10.
  5. Jaiswal, J. (2014). Environmental Impact on SMEs Growth and Sustainability- Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Studies in Dynamics and Change (JSDC), 1(2), 101-112.
  6. Jerzyk, E. (2015). Zrównoważone opakowanie jako czynnik procesu podejmowania decyzji zakupowych z perspektywy polskich i francuskich młodych konsumentów. Journal of Agriculture & Rural Development, 3(37), 1-8. doi: 7306/JARD.2015.46.
  7. Kużelewska, E., Bartnicki, A. (2017). Grupa Wyszehradzka - nowe wyzwania bezpieczeństwa i perspektywy współpracy. Roczniki Integracji Europejskiej, 11, 103-117.
  8. Liu, Y., Liu, L., Li, Y. (2023). Executive Hometown Identity and Green Innovation in Enterprises of Heavy Polluting Industries-A Dual Perspective Based on Conscious Motivation and Resource Access. Sustainability, 15, 6398. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ su15086398.
  9. Mishra, M.K., Choudhury, D., Rao, K.S.V.G. (2019). Impact of SMEs Green Supply Chain Practice Adoption on SMEs Firm and Environmental Performance. Theoretical Economics Letters, 9, 1901-1919. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2019.96121.
  10. Nulkar, G. (2014). SMEs and environmental performance - a framework for green business strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 130-140. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.177.
  11. Olejarz, T., Siwiec, D., Pacana, A. (2022). Method of Qualitative-Environmental Choice of Devices Converting Green Energy. Energies, 15, 8845. https://doi.org/10.3390/ en15238845.
  12. Pacana, A., Siwiec, D., Bednárová, L. (2020). Method of Choice: A Fluorescent Penetrant Taking into Account Sustainability Criteria. Sustainability, 12, 5854. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su12145854.
  13. Pimenowa, O., Pimenov, S., Fyliuk, H., Sitnicki, M.W., Kolosha, V., Kurinskyi, D. (2023). Sustainable Business Model of Modern Enterprises in Conditions of Uncertainty and Turbulence. Sustainability, 15, 2654. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032654.
  14. Pinget, A., Bocquet, R., Mothe, C. (2015). Barriers to Environmental Innovation in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from French Firms. M@n@gement, 18(2), 132-155. doi: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.182.0132.
  15. Rodrigues, M., Franco, M. (2023). Green Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): A Qualitative Approach. Sustainability, 15, 4510. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054510.
  16. Saqib, Z.A., Qin, L., Menhas, R., Lei, G. (2023). Strategic Sustainability and Operational Initiatives in Small- and Medium-Sized Manufacturers: An Empirical Analysis. Sustainability, 15, 6330. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076330.
  17. Siwiec, D., Bełch, P., Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M., Pacana, A., Bednarova, L. (2022). Determinants of making decisions in improving the quality of products. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 157, 497-507, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.157.31.
  18. Siwiec, D., Pacana, A. (2021). Model Supporting Development Decisions by Considering Qualitative-Environmental Aspects. Sustainability, 13, 9067. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su13169067.
  19. Siwiec, D., Pacana, A., Gazda, A. (2023). A New QFD-CE Method for Considering the Concept of Sustainable Development and Circular Economy. Energies, 16, 2474. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052474.
  20. Szabó, R.Z., Szedmák, B., Tajti, A., Bera, P. (2023). Environmental Sustainability, Digitalisation, and the Entrepreneurial Perception of Distances as Drivers of SMEs' Internationalisation. Sustainability, 15, 2487. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032487.
  21. Wysocki, J. (2018). Działalność proekologiczna dużych przedsiębiorstw produkcyjnych w Polsce - wyniki badań ankietowych. In: K. Poznańska (ed.), Nowe formy innowacji (pp. 82-109). Warszawa.
  22. Yasir, N., Babar, M., Mehmood, H.S., Xie, R., Guo, G. (2023). The Environmental Values Play a Role in the Development of Green Entrepreneurship to Achieve Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention. Sustainability, 15, 6451. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ su15086451.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1641-3466
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.172.33
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu