BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Espolov Tlektes (Kazakh National Agrarian University, Department of Management and Organization of Agribusiness, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan), Espolov Aidos (Kazakh National Agrarian University, Department of Management and Organization of Agribusiness, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan), Aitkozhina Dariga (University named after D.A. Kunaeva, Department of Jurisprudence, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan), Tireuov Kanat (Kazakh National Agrarian University, Department of Management and Organization of Agribusiness, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan), Raiymbekov Sailaukhan (Kazakh National Agrarian University, Department of Management and Organization of Agribusiness, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan), Suleimenov Zhenisbek (Kazakh National Agrarian University, Department of Management and Organization of Agribusiness, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan)
Tytuł
Comparing COVID-19 Budgeting Responses: New Budgeting Principles that Resulted from the Pandemic
Porównanie reakcji na COVID-19: nowe zasady budżetowania, będące efektem pandemii
Źródło
Comparative Economic Research, 2023, vol. 26, nr 4, s. 7-25, rys., tab., bibliogr. 36 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Transformacja cyfrowa, Polityka gospodarcza, Administracja publiczna, Budżet, COVID-19
Digital transformation, Economic policy, Public administration, Budget, COVID-19
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: E60, H61, H83
summ., streszcz.
Abstrakt
Niniejsze opracowanie stanowi analizę porównawczą ograniczeń budżetowych członków Wspólnoty Niepodległych Państw, skupiając się na reakcjach fiskalnych na kryzys wywołany przez pandemię COVID-19 i na możliwościach poprawy ich konstrukcji. Metodologia obejmuje podejście statystyczne oparte na ocenach wskaźników makroekonomicznych dla lat 2020-2021, a także na światowych rankingach i kilku systemach pomiarowych. W wyniku analizy porównawczej administracji publicznej sformułowano nowe zasady budżetowania. Proponowane zasady koncentrują się na monitorowaniu, ocenie i prognozowaniu danych dotyczących długoterminowego zarządzania zrównoważonym rozwojem i innych rodzajów ryzyka fiskalnego. Zaproponowane zasady budżetowania mogą zapewnić krajowi nowe możliwości potrzebne do rozszerzenia jego potencjału w trakcie dalszego rozwoju gospodarczego w polityce globalnej. Głównym rezultatem tych badań jest odnowione podejście do zarządzania budżetem z wykorzystaniem danych dotyczących rzeczywistej sytuacji gospodarczej i zdolności adaptacyjnych do zmian. Proponowany system zarządzania budżetem kładzie podwaliny pod przyszły rozwój potencjału kraju i wpisuje się w priorytetowe cele państw WNP w zakresie demokratyzacji. Wartość tych badań polega na przedstawieniu i podsumowaniu analizy systemu zarządzania budżetem oraz uszczegółowieniu polityk budżetowych w celu identyfikacji i odzwierciedlenia priorytetów politycznych państw. Pomaga to sformułować zalecenia i sugestie dotyczące usprawnienia procesu budżetowego, osiągnięcia zrównoważonego podziału zasobów i strategicznych celów rozwojowych. Praktyczne zastosowanie wyników badań pozwoli specjalistom ds. polityki budżetowej, ekonomistom i statystykom zapoznać się ze zmianami w krajobrazie instytucjonalnym w czasie pandemii COVID-19 i ocenić sytuację w ich regionie z punktu widzenia władz administracyjnych. (abstrakt oryginalny)

This study provides a comparative analysis of the budget limits of the Commonwealth of Inde-pendent States members, focusing on fiscal responses to the COVID crisis and options for im-proving the structure. The methodology comprised a statistical approach based on assessments of macroeconomic indicators for 2020-2021, as well as world rankings and several measurement systems. The following new budgeting principles were formulated as a result of the compara-tive analysis of public administration. The proposed principles focus on monitoring, assessing, and forecast data of long-term sustainability management and other fiscal risks. The proposed budgeting principles could provide a country with the new opportunities needed to expand its potential during further economic advancement in global politics. The central result of this work is a renewed approach to budget management using data on the actual economic situa-tion and adaptability to changes. The proposed budget management scheme lays the foundation for the future development of a country's potential and aligns with the priority goals of the CIS member states in terms of democracy. The value of this research lies in presenting and summa-rizing the analysis of the budget management system and the detailing of budgetary policies to identify and reflect the political priorities of countries. This helps formulate recommendations and suggestions for improving the budgetary process, achieving a balanced distribution of re-sources, and attaining strategic development goals. The practical application of the findings will allow budget policy specialists, economists, and statisticians to become familiar with the chang-es in the institutional landscape amid COVID-19 and assess the situation in their region through the prism of administrative sovereignties. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation (2020), Operational report on the execution of the federal budget and budgets of state extra budgetary funds for 2020, https://ach.gov.ru/upload/iblock/e37/e371835371389756c2d319de62f0bd12.pdf (accessed: 21.12.2022).
  2. Al Mandhari, A., Kodama, C., Abubakar, A., Brennan, R. (2020), Solidarity in response to COVID-19 outbreak in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, "Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal", 26 (5), pp. 492-494.
  3. Alsharari, N.M. (2019), Accounting changes and beyond budgeting principles (BBP) in the public sector: Institutional isomorphism, "International Journal of Public Sector Management", 33 (2/3), pp. 165-189, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-10-2018-0217
  4. Analytical Review (2022), About Us. Climate Action Network, https://caneecca.org/en/about us/ (accessed: 21.12.2022).
  5. Andrew, J., Baker, M., Guthrie, J., Martin Sardesai, A. (2020), Australia's COVID-19 public budgeting response: the straitjacket of neoliberalism, "Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management", 32 (5), pp. 759-770, https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2020-0096
  6. Argento, D., Kaarbøe, K., Vakkuri, J. (2020), Constructing certainty through public budgeting: budgetary responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland, Norway and Sweden, "Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management", 32 (5), pp. 875-887, https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2020-0093
  7. Beazley, I., Downes, R., Nicol, S. (2019), Budgeting in Kazakhstan: A roadmap for continued budgetary governance reform, "OECD Journal on Budgeting", 18 (3), pp. 9-80, https://www.oecd ilibrary.org/governance/budgeting in kazakhstan_08310b83 en (accessed: 21.12.2022).
  8. Clemens, J., Veuger, S. (2020), Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for state government tax revenues, "National Tax Journal", 73 (3), pp. 619-644, https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2020.3.01
  9. Downes, R., Moretti, D., Nico, S. (2017), Budgeting and Performance in the European Union: A review by the OECD in the context of EU Budget Focused on Results, OECD, https://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/budgeting and performance in the eu oecd review.pdf (accessed: 21.12.2022).
  10. Drew, J., Miyazaki, M. (2022), The moral justification and practice of intergovernmental equalization grants to local government - A subsidiarity perspective, "Australian Journal of Public Administration", 81 (1), pp. 3-17, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12445
  11. Executive Committee of the Commonwealth of Independent States (2022), https://cis.minsk.by/ (accessed: 21.12.2022).
  12. Frieden, J. (2020), The political economy of economy policy, International Monetary Fund, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2020/06/political economy of economic policy jeff frieden (accessed: 21.12.2022).
  13. Gigineishvili, M.N., Teodoru, I.R., Karapetyan, N., Ustyugova, M.Y., Houtte, M.J. van, Jonas, J., Shi, W., Arzoumanian, S., Tintchev, K., Tintchev, K.I., Tuuli, M., Saliba, F., Talishli, F., El Said, M., Brollo, F. (2023), Paving the Way to More Resilient, Inclusive, and Greener Economies in the Caucasus and Central Asia, International Monetary Fund, Washington.
  14. Grossi, G., Mauro, S.G., Vakkuri, J. (2018), Converging and diverging pressures in PBB development: the experiences of Finland and Sweden, "Public Management Review", 20 (12), pp. 1836-1857, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1438500
  15. Gruber, J., Sommers, B.D. (2020), Paying for Medicaid - State Budgets and the Case for Expansion in the Time of Coronavirus, "New England Journal of Medicine", 382 (24), pp. 2280-2282, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2007124
  16. Hasanova, V., Korzovatykh, Z. (2016), The concept and essence of budgeting in modern conditions, "Vestnik Universiteta", 2, pp. 134-140.
  17. HSE (2020), Analytical Bulletin of the National Research University Higher School of Economics on the economic and social consequences of the coronavirus in Russia and the world, https://www.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/381715657.pdf (accessed: 21.12.2022).
  18. Kittelmann, K., Tirpak, M., Schweickert, R., Vinhas de Souza, L. (2006), From Transition Crises to Macroeconomic Stability? Lessons from a Crises Early Warning System for Eastern European and CIS Countries, "Comparative Economic Studies", 48, pp. 410-434, https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100162
  19. Krafchik, W. (2020), Open Budget Survey 2019, 7th edition, International Budget Partnership, Nairobi.
  20. Melnychuk, N. (2020), Scientific approach to assessing the effective management of budgetary funds, "Innovative Economy", 1-2, pp. 151-156, https://doi.org/10.37332/2309-1533.2020.1-2.22
  21. Michelon, P.S., Lunkes, R.J., Bornia, A.C. (2020), Capital budgeting: a systematic review of the literature, "SciELO, Brazil", 30, e20190020, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20190020
  22. Moloney, С. (2021), Deconcentrated global governance, transnational administration, and the public administration discipline, "Global Public Policy and Governance", 1 (2), pp. 175-201, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508 021 00013 y
  23. Moser, B., Korac, S. (2020), Introducing Gender Perspectives in the Budgetary Process at the Central Government Level, "International Journal of Public Administration", 44 (14), pp. 1274-1285, https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1755683
  24. Muth, K. (2019), The Potential and Limits of Administrative Sovereignty, [in:] D. Stone, K. Moloney (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 59-74, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198758648.013.2
  25. Nielsen, P.A., Moynihan, D.P. (2017), How do Politicians Attribute Bureaucratic Responsibility for Performance? Negativity Bias and Interest Group Advocacy, "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory", 27 (2), pp. 269-283, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw060
  26. Norman, J. (2020), Budget 2020: delivering on our promises to the British people, HM Treasury, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/871799/Budget_2020_Web_Accessible_Complete.pdf (accessed: 21.12.2022).
  27. OECD (2019), Reforming Kazakhstan: progress, challenges and opportunities, https://www.oecd.org/eurasia/countries/Eurasia Reforming Kazakhstan Progress Challenges Opport.pdf (accessed: 21.12.2022).
  28. Plaček, M., Ochrana, F., Půček, M.J., Nemec, J. (2020), Fiscal Decentralization Reforms and Local Government Efficiency: An Introduction, [in:] M. Plaček, F. Ochrana, M.J. Půček, J. Nemec, Fiscal Decentralization Reforms, Springer, Cham, pp. 1-49, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46758-6_1
  29. Sicilia, M., Steccolini, I. (2017), Public budgeting in search for an identity: state of the art and future challenges, "Public Management Review", 19 (7), pp. 905-910, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1243809
  30. Siripurapu, A., Masters, J. (2021), How COVID-19 is Harming State and City Budgets, Council on Foreign Relations, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/how COVID-19 harming stateand city budgets (accessed: 21.12.2022).
  31. Sullivan, H. (2021), Reflecting on AJPA, 2015-2021: Revisiting the relationship between policy academics and public servants - Distances from learning, "Australian Journal of Public Administration", 80 (4), pp. 652-660, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12527
  32. Waheduzzaman, W., Khandaker, S. (2022), E-participation for combating corruption, increasing voice and accountability, and developing government effectiveness: A cross-country data analysis, "Australian Journal of Public Administration", 81 (4), pp. 549-568, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12544
  33. Wendling, С., Doherty, L., Curristin, T., Raheem, F., Tang, V., Amber, B. (2020), Crisis budgeting: recommendations for preparation budget for 2021, IMF, Washington.
  34. World Bank (2021), Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/Home/Documents#wgiDataCrossCtry (accessed: 21.12.2022).
  35. World Health Organization (2021), Indicators Explorer, https://gateway.euro.who.int/ru/hfaexplorer/# (accessed: 21.12.2022).
  36. Zhyber, T. (2020), Genesis of budgeting at the macro level, "Herald of Knute", 6, pp. 66-76, https://doi.org/10.31617/visnik.knute.2020(134)07
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
1508-2008
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.26.28
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu