BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Pietrzak Michał (Warsaw University of Life Sciences), Chlebicka Aleksandra (Warsaw University of Life Sciences)
Tytuł
Gemeinschaft Versus Gesellschaft : Cooperatives and the Problem of Free-riding in the Provision of Collective Goods
Źródło
Social Entrepreneurship Review (SER), 2023, vol. 2, s. 27-46, tab., rys., bibliogr. 63 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Spółdzielczość, Dobro wspólne, Organizacje hybrydowe
Cooperative movement, Common good, Hybrid organizations
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: B52, D02, D23, J54.
summ.
Abstrakt
Background: Cooperatives are unique entities that combine both non-profit and business attributes, reflecting the dual nature of Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft.
Research objectives: This article aims to explore the hybrid nature of cooperatives and the tension between community and business aspects in the context of the provision of collective goods. Specifically, we focused on the free-riding problem, which can harm the viability of cooperatives.
Research design and methods: We based the article on critical analysis and discussion of the literature. The research questions were as follows: What is the inherent nature of cooperatives? What is the essence of the free-rider problem in cooperatives? How could the dual nature of cooperatives help deal with the problem of free-riding?
Results: We discussed different Gemeinschaft-based approaches to mitigate free riding, such as kinship selection, direct reciprocity, and indirect reciprocity, which, however, create limitations on the size of the group of cooperators. There is tension between Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft, as increasing member-ship for economic growth can lead to the erosion of social capital. We discussed three possible solutions, including massification, privatization, and leveraging the possibilities of online communities.
Conclusions: Only the last approach, namely leveraging possibilities of online communities offers the solution to the difficult situation caused by the tension between Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft as it does not violate the cooperative identity while still allowing for increased scale of the operations. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (2006 [1961]). Some Economics of Property. In The Collected Works of Armen A. Alchian. Volume 2: Property Rights and Economic Behavior (pp. 3-51). Liberty Fund.
  2. Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. The American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.
  3. Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (2006 [1973]). The Property Rights Paradigm. In The Collected Works of Armen A. Alchian. Volume 2: Property Rights and Economic Behavior (pp. 84-95). Liberty Fund.
  4. Axelrod, R. (2006 [1984]). The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books.
  5. Bierówka, J. (2009). Zasada wzajemności w społeczeństwie informacyjnym. Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM.
  6. Bonus, H. (1991 [1986]). The Cooperative Association as a Business Enterprise: A Study in the Economics of Transactions. In E. G. Furubotn & R. Richter (Eds.), The New Institutional Economics: A Collection of Articles from the Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. Mohr.
  7. Burnicka, A., & Zygmuntowski, J. J. (2019). #CoopTech: Platform Cooperativism as the Engine of Solidarity Growth. Instrat.
  8. Cheung, S. N. S. (1983). The Contractual Nature of the Firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 1-21.
  9. Chlebicka, A., & Pietrzak, M. (2018). Size of Membership and Survival Patterns of Producers' Organizations in Agriculture - Social Aspects Based on Evidence from Poland. Sustainability, 10(7), 2293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072293
  10. Cook, M. L. (1995). The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo-Institutional Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77( 5 ) , 1153 -1159.
  11. Czarnik, S. (2007). Gry eksperymentalne i manowce racjonalistycznego egoizmu. Decyzje, 8, 27-52.
  12. Draheim, G. (1952). Die Genossenschaft als Unternehmungstyp. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  13. Dunbar, R. (1998). Theory of mind and the evolution of language. In J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & C. Knight (Eds.), Approaches to the Evolution of Language (pp. 92-110). Cambridge University Press.
  14. Dunbar, R. (2016). Człowiek - biografia. Copernicus Center Press.
  15. Dunn, J., Crooks, A., Frederick, D. A., Kennedy, T., & Wadsworth, J. (2003). Meeting the Challenge: Coops in the 21st Century. Rural Cooperatives, January/February, 4-6.
  16. Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(23), 785-791.
  17. Frederick, D. A. (1997). Co-ops 101: An Introduction to Cooperatives. Cooperative Information Report 55. U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/pub/cir55/cir55rpt.htm
  18. Furubotn, E., & Pejovich, S. (1974 [1970]). Property Rights and the Behavior of the Firm in a Socialist State: The Example of Yugoslavia. In E. Furubotn & S. Pejovich (Eds.), The Economics of Property Rights (pp. 227-251). Ballinger Publishing Company.
  19. Ghiselin, M. T. (1978). The Economy of the Body. American Economic Review, 68(2), 233-237.
  20. Ginder, R. G. (1993). Aaron Sapiro's Theory of Cooperatives: A Contemporary Assessment. Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, 8, 93 -102.
  21. Hansmann, H. (2000 [1996]). The Ownership of Enterprise. Harvard University Press.
  22. Henning, O. H. (2015). Food Economics: Industry and Markets. Routledge.
  23. Hirshleifer, J. (1978). Competition, Cooperation, and Conflict in Economics and Biology. American Economic Review, 68(2), 238 -243.
  24. Hołda-Róziewicz, H. (1992). 'Wspólnota i stowarzyszenie' Ferdinand Tönnies, Warszawa 1988: [recenzja]. Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki, 37(1), 16 4 -174.
  25. ICA (2023). Statement of the Cooperative Identity. https://www.ica.coop/en/cooperatives/cooperative-identity
  26. Iliopoulos, C. (2009). The Evolution of Solutions to the Free Rider Problem in US Agricultural Bargaining Cooperatives. In A. N. Rezitis (Ed.), Research Topics in Agricultural and Applied Economics (pp. 77-94). Bentham Science Publishers.
  27. Ingalsbe, G., & Groves, F. W. (1989). Historical Development. In D. Cobia (Ed.), Cooperatives in Agriculture (pp. 106 -120). Prentice Hall.
  28. Jakubowski, M. (2012). Dobra publiczne i dobra wspólne. In J. Wilkin (Ed.), Teoria wyboru publicznego. Główne nurty i zastosowania (pp. 42-65). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  29. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2000 [1979]). Rights and Production Functions: An Application to Labor Managed Firms and Codetermination. In A Theory of the Firm: Governance, Residual Claims and Organizational Forms. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper No. 2000. Harvard University Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=173460
  30. Kargol-Wasiluk, A. (2008). Teoria dóbr publicznych a paradygmat ekonomii sektora publicznego. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 3( 5 ) , 91-117.
  31. Konieczny, L., Roterman, I., & Spólnik, P. (2017). Biologia systemów. Strategia działania organizmu żywego. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  32. Lichbach, M. L. (1996). The Cooperator's Dilemma. The University of Michigan Press.
  33. Lichbach, M. L. (1998). Contending Theories of Contentious Politics and the Structure-Action Problem of Social Order. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 401- 424.
  34. Meyer, M. (2018). Economics and Biology - in Search of Common Ground. Acta Sci. Pol. Oeconomia, 17(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.22630/ASPE.2018.17.1.8
  35. Mierzwa, D. (2005). W poszukiwaniu nowego modelu spółdzielczości rolniczej. Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej we Wrocławiu.
  36. Nilsson, J. (1999). Cooperative Organisational Models as Reflections of the Business Environments. Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 48(4), 449-470.
  37. Nilsson, J., & Hendrikse, G. (2011). Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft in Cooperatives. In M. Tuunanem, J. Windsper-ger, G. Cliquet, & G. Hendrikse (Eds.), New Developments in the Theory of Networks: Franchising, Alliances and Cooperatives (pp. 339-352). Physica-Verlag.
  38. North, D. C. (1981). Structure and Change in Economic History. W. W. Norton.
  39. North, D. C. (2011 [1990]). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
  40. Nourse, E. G. (1992 [1945]). The Place of the Cooperative in Our National Economy. Journal of Agricultural Coop-eration, 7, 105 -111.
  41. Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation. Science, 314, 1560-1563.
  42. Olson, M. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press.
  43. Ostrom, E. (2003). How Types of Good and Property Rights Jointly Affect Collective Action. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 239 -270.
  44. Ostrom, E. (2011 [1990]). Governing The Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
  45. Pejovich, S. (2015 [1969]). The Firm, Monetary Policy and Property Rights in a Planned Economy. In B. Horvat (Ed.), Self-Governing Socialism (pp. 261-271). Routledge.
  46. Pietrzak, M. (2006). Efektywność finansowa spółdzielni mleczarskich - koncepcja oceny. Wydawnictwo SGGW.
  47. Pietrzak, M. (2022). Fenomen spółdzielni rolników. Pomiędzy rynkiem, hierarchią i klanem. CeDeWu.
  48. Porter, P. K., & Scully, G. W. (1987). Economic Efficiency in Cooperatives. Journal of Law and Economics, 30, 489-512.
  49. Riolo, R. L., Cohen, M. D., & Axelrod, R. (2001). Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity. Nature, 414, 441-443.
  50. Scholz, T. (2016). Platform Cooperativism vs. the Sharing Economy. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung.
  51. Schubert, C. (2012). Is Novelty Always a Good Thing? Towards an Evolutionary Welfare Economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22, 585 - 619. https://doi.org/10.10 07/s 0 0191- 011- 02 57-x
  52. Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. Penguin.
  53. Szabo, G. G. (2005). 'Cooperative identity' - a Concept for Economic Analysis and Evaluation of Cooperative Flexibility: The Case of the Dutch Dairy Cooperatives. XXI International Cooperative Research Conference: The contribution of cooperatives to community culture. University College. htttp://www.ucc.ie/acad/foodbus/CCS/ICA/Ppr.Szabo.pdf
  54. Szacki, J. (1988). Wstęp do wydania polskiego. In F. Tönnies, Wspólnota i stowarzyszenie. Rozprawa o komunizmie i socjalizmie jako empirycznych formach kultury (pp. XIII-LII). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  55. Sztompka, P. (2007). Socjologia. Analiza społeczeństwa. Wydawnictwo Znak.
  56. Tönnies, F. (1988). Wspólnota i stowarzyszenie. Rozprawa o komunizmie i socjalizmie jako empirycznych formach kultury. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  57. Valentinov, V. (2004). Toward a Social Capital Theory of Cooperative Organization. Journal of Cooperative Studies, 37(3), 5-20.
  58. van Bekkum, O. F. (2001). Cooperative Models and Farm Policy Reform. Van Gorcum.
  59. Vitaliano, P. (1983). Cooperative Enterprise: An Alternative Conceptual Basis for Analyzing a Complex Institution. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(5), 1078 -1083.
  60. Williamson, O. E. (1998). Ekonomiczne instytucje kapitalizmu. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  61. Załęski, P. (2011). Tönnies i społeczeństwo cywilne. Źródła nowoczesnej koncepcji społeczeństwa. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, VII(2), 72-83.
  62. Zeuli, K. A., & Cropp, R. (2004). Cooperatives: Principles and practices in the 21st century. Cooperative Extension Publishing of the University of Wisconsin, Madison.
  63. Zygmuntowski, J. J. (2018). Commoning in the Digital Era: Platform Cooperativism as a Counter to Cognitive Capitalism. Praktyka Teoretyczna, 1(27), 168-192. https://doi.org/10.14746/prt.2018.1.7
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2720-7277
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/SER.2023.2.02
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu