BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Kamińska Katarzyna (Warsaw School of Economics, Poland)
Tytuł
Quality of Institutions and International Competitiveness of the Visegrad Countries in the Second Decade of the Twenty-first Century
Źródło
Social Entrepreneurship Review (SER), 2023, vol. 2, s. 47-59, tab., rys., bibliogr. 40 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Rozwój społeczno-gospodarczy, Konkurencyjność międzynarodowa, Instytucje
Social economic development, International competitiveness, Institutions
Uwagi
Klasyfikacja JEL: O43, P37, P48, P52.
summ.
Abstrakt
Background: The Visegrad countries are an interesting example of countries that underwent a systemic transition in the 1990s from a command economy to a market economy, which included institutional changes.
Research objectives: The article aims to determine the quality of institutions and the international competitiveness of the Visegrad countries.
Research design and methods: We conducted the research among the Visegrad countries by analysing changes in the Global Competitiveness Index and based on the currently available data from World Economic Forum reports (2011-2012 and 2019).
Results: The results of the analysis of the V4 group regarding the quality of existing institutions show a significant improvement in their position in the global ranking.
Conclusions: As a direct result of the research, we could identify areas characterised by high-quality institutions and those that still require change and special consideration by the governments of these countries. (original abstract)
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369-1401.
  2. Andriesse, E. (2008). Institutions and Regional Development in Southeast Asia. A comparative analysis of Satun(Thailand) and Perlis (Malaysia). Netherlands Geographical Studies.
  3. Aron, J. (2000). Growth and Institutions: A Review of the Evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(1), 99-135.
  4. Baumol, W. J., Litan, R. E., Schramm, C.J., & Negro, N. (2009). Capitalismo Buono Capitalismo Cattivo: L'imprendito-rialità e i suoi Nemici, Università Bocconi.
  5. Bengtsson, M., Berggren, N., & Jordahl, H. (2005). Trust and Growth in the 1990s: A Robustness Analysis. Ratio Working Papers 60. The Ratio Institute.
  6. Beugelsdijk, S., de Groot, H. L. F., & van Schaik, A. B. T. M. (2004). Trust and Economic Growth. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 118-134.
  7. Carlson, D. (2022). Why emerging markets might be worth owning in a diversified portfolio. Britannica Money. https://www.britannica.com/money/what-is-emerging-market-investing
  8. Czarny, E., & Śledziewska, K. (2012). Międzynarodowa współpraca gospodarcza w warunkach kryzysu. PWE.
  9. Dołęgowski, T. (2002). Konkurencyjność instytucjonalna i systemowa w warunkach gospodarki globalnej. Implikacje dla sektora usług. Monografie i Opracowania 505. Szkoła Główna Handlowa.
  10. Gabrisch, H. (2006). Vertical Intra-Industry Trade Between EU and Accession Countries. IHW Discussion Paper, 12, 3-24.
  11. Gabrisch, H., & Segnana, M. L. (2003). Vertical and Horizontal Patterns of Intra-Industry. Institut für Wirtschafts-forschung.
  12. Ganau, R. (2017). Institutions and Economic Growth in Africa: A Spatial Econometric Approach. Economia Poli-tica, 34, 425-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-017-0057-3
  13. Hall, R. E., Jones C. I. (1999). Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1) , 83-116.
  14. Jakóbik, W. (2006). Gospodarka polska na tle Unii Europejskiej. Determinanty dalszego jej wzrostu, In W. Jakóbik (Ed.), Gospodarka polska w procesie światowych przemian (pp. 72-92). Wyższa Szkoła Handlu i Prawa im. R. Łazarskiego.
  15. Kamińska, K. (2022). Influence of Institutions on the International Competitiveness of the Polish Economy in the Second Decade of the 21st Century. In A. M. Kowalski, M. A. Weresa (Eds.), Poland Competitiveness Report 2022. Towards a sustainable economy in a pandemic era (pp. 109-119). SGH Publishing House. https://doi.org/10.33119/978-83-8030-567-0.2022
  16. Kaminski, B. (2001). How Accession to the European Union has Affected External Trade and Foreign Direct Investment in Central European Countries. Policy Research Working Paper, 2578, 3-43.
  17. Kandogan, Y. (2003). Intra-Industry Trade of Transition Countries: Trends and Determinants. William Davidson Working Paper, 566, 1-24.
  18. Knack, S. (2003). Groups, Growth and Trust: Cross-Country Evidence on the Olson and Putnam Hypotheses. Public Choice, 117(3 - 4), 3 41-355.
  19. Kotyński J. (2002). Konkurencyjność Polski w UE i szanse jej podniesienia. Strategia dla Polski po wejściu do UE na lata 2004-2015. Komitet Prognoz 'Polska 2000 Plus' PAN.
  20. Landes, D. S. (1998). Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some are So Rich and Some So Poor. Abacus.
  21. Lissowska, M. (2008). Instytucje gospodarki rynkowej w Polsce. C.H. Beck.
  22. Miłaszewicz, D. (2011). Jakość instytucji a wzrost gospodarczy. Studia i prace wydziału nauk ekonomicznych i zarządzania, 19, 5-24.
  23. Molendowski, E. (2007). Liberalizacja wymiany handlowej krajów Europy Środkowowschodniej w okresie transformacji. Ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem doświadczeń krajów CEFTA. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie.
  24. Nawaz, S., Iqbal, N., & Khan, M. A. (2014). The Impact of Institutional Quality on Economic Growth: Panel Evidence. The Pakistan Development Review, 53(1), 15-31. www.jstor.org/stable/24397923
  25. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
  26. Olczyk, M., Kuc-Czarnecka, M., & Saltelli, A. (2022). Changes in the Global Competitiveness Index 4.0 Methodology: The Improved Approach of Competitiveness Benchmarking. Journal of Competitiveness, 14(1), 118-135. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2022.01.07
  27. Przesławska, G. (2009). Wpływ jakości instytucji w Polsce na międzynarodową konkurencyjność kraju. Polityka Gospodarcza nr 17-18. Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie.
  28. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., Trebbi, E. (2002), Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Inte-gration in Economic Development. NBER Working Paper 9305. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  29. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A. (2003). The Primacy of Institutions: (and what this does and does not mean), ht t p s: //www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/022/0040/002/article-A010-en.xml.
  30. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A. & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131-165.
  31. Rodrik, D. (2007). One Economics. Many Recipes. Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4jbh
  32. Rodrik, D. (2014). Green Industrial Policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 469-491. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru025
  33. Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2006). Better Rules or Stronger Communities? On the Social Foundations of Institutional Change and Its Economic Effects. Economic Geography, 82(1), 1-2 5.
  34. Schwab, C. (2011). The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012. World Economic Forum.
  35. Schwab, C. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. World Economic Forum.
  36. Stimson, R. J., Stough Roger, R., & Salazar, M. (2005). Leadership and Institutional Factors in Endogenous Regional Economic Development. Investigaciones Regionales, 7, 23-52.
  37. Talmaciu, M. (2012). Role of Institutions in the Economic Development of Central and Eastern EU Countries. Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business & Economics, 2 012, http://doi.org.10.5171/2012.328384
  38. Wojtyna, A. (2005). Alternatywne modele kapitalizmu. Gospodarka Narodowa, 9, 1 -23.
  39. Vijayaraghavan, M., & Ward, W. A. (2001). Institutions and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from a Cross-National Analysis. Working Paper 001302. Center for International Trade, Clemson University.
  40. World Bank. (2002). World Development Report 2002: Building Institutions for Markets. World Bank and Oxford University Press.
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
2720-7277
Język
eng
URI / DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/SER.2023.2.03
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu