BazEkon - Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie

BazEkon home page

Meny główne

Autor
Pilc Michał (Poznań University of Economics and Business)
Tytuł
Determinants of labour market institutions and their reforms from the perspective of economics and political science
Determinanty instytucji rynku pracy i ich reform z perspektywy ekonomii i politologii
Źródło
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 2024, nr 4, s. 185-207, bibliogr. 98 poz.
Słowa kluczowe
Rynek pracy, Reformy gospodarcze, Przegląd literatury
Labour market, Economic reforms, Literature review
Uwagi
streszcz., summ.
Abstrakt
Opracowanie jest integracyjnym przeglądem 101 artykułów wybranych z bazy Web of Science: Social Science Citation Index, z czasopism należących do dyscyplin ekonomia oraz nauki o polityce, które dotyczą przyczyn zróżnicowania instytucji rynku pracy zarówno w przestrzeni, jak i w czasie. Celem pracy była identyfikacja luk w literaturze ekonomicznej przez porównanie jej z literaturą należącą do innej dyscypliny nauk społecznych. Lukę taką znaleziono w ramach ekonomii głównego nurtu, która wskazuje, że instytucje rynku pracy są optymalną odpowiedzią reprezentatywnego wyborcy na zawodności rynku lub preferowanym (przez tego wyborcę) sposobem redystrybucji dochodów. Analiza ekonomiczna skupiona jest na zróżnicowaniu instytucji w przestrzeni (między krajami), ale prawie zupełnie pomija ewolucję instytucji w czasie. Natomiast nauki o polityce są mocno skupione na badaniu wybranych przypadków zmian instytucjonalnych, włączając do analizy nie tylko wyborców, ale przede wszystkim działania i preferencje związków zawodowych, organizacji pracodawców i partii politycznych. Na podstawie dokonanego przeglądu rekomenduje się, aby w ramach ekonomii głównego nurtu uwzględnić możliwość wpływania na wybór społeczny przez racjonalne podmioty nie tylko drogą głosowania, lecz także za pośrednictwem grup interesu. Pozwoliłoby to ekonomistom głównego nurtu lepiej wyjaśniać reformy rynku pracy bez konieczności zmiany stosowanego paradygmatu. (abstrakt oryginalny)

This presented study is an integrative review of 101 journal articles selected from the Web of Science Social Science Citation Index database in the field of economics and political science, focusing on the determinants of the heterogeneity of labour market institutions, both spatial and temporal. It aims to identify research gaps in the economics literature by comparing it with another social science discipline. The main limitation is found within the mainstream economics, which indicates that labour market institutions are an optimal response of a representative voter to market failures, or the preferred way (by that voter) to redistribute income. The analysis focuses on the spatial heterogeneity of institutions (between countries), with minimal consideration of their temporal evolution. In contrast, political science strongly focuses on selected cases of institutional change, incorporating the preferences and actions of not only voters but also of trade unions, employers' associations, and political parties. The study concludes that allowing the rational agent to have an impact on the institutional choice through both voting and interest groups would enable mainstream economists to better explain labour market reforms without compromising the discipline's defining features. (original abstract)
Dostępne w
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach
Biblioteka Główna Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu
Pełny tekst
Pokaż
Bibliografia
Pokaż
  1. Afonso, A., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2015). How the populist radical right transformed Swiss welfare politics: From compromises to polarization. Swiss Political Science Review, 21(4), 617-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12182
  2. Alesina, A., Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., & Giuliano, P. (2015). Family values and the regulation of labor. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(4), 599-630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12121
  3. Algan, Y., & Cahuc, P. (2009). Civic Virtue and Labor Market Institutions. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 1(1), 111-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.1.1.111
  4. Allan, J. P., & Scruggs, L. (2004). Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 496-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00083.x
  5. Armingeon, K. (2007). Active labour market policy, international organizations and domestic politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(6), 905-932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701497923
  6. Anderson, K. M. (2001). The politics of retrenchment in a social democratic welfare state: Reform of Swedish pensions and unemployment insurance. Comparative Political Studies, 34(9), 1063-1091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034009005
  7. Arpaia, A., & Mourre, G. (2009). Institutions and performance in European labour markets: Taking a fresh look at evidence. European Economy. Economic Papers, No. 391.
  8. Becher, M. (2009). Constraining ministerial power: The impact of veto players on labor market reforms in industrial democracies, 1973-2000. Comparative Political Studies, 43(1), 33-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009341716
  9. Becker, G. S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(3), 371-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1886017
  10. Berg, J. (Ed.). (2015). Labour markets, institutions and inequality: Building just societies in the 21st century. Edward Elgar; International Labour Office. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784712105
  11. Bittschi, B., & Wigger, B. U. (2023). Who wants (them) to work longer? Economics Letters, 227, 111122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111122
  12. Blanchard, O., & Wolfers, J. (2000). The role of shocks and institutions in the rise of European unemployment: The aggregate evidence. The Economic Journal, 110(462), 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00518
  13. Boeri, T. (2010). Institutional reforms and dualism in European labor markets. In D. Card & O. Ashenfelter (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4B, pp. 1173-1236). North Holland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02411-7
  14. Boeri, T., Börsch-Supan, A., Tabellini, G., Moene, K. O., & Lockwood, B. (2001). Would you like to shrink the welfare state? A survey of European citizens. Economic Policy, 16(32), 9-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00069
  15. Boeri, T., Conde-Ruiz, J. I., & Galasso, V. (2012). The political economy of flexicurity. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(4), 684-715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01065.x
  16. Boeri, T., & Jimeno, J. F. (2016). Learning from the Great Divergence in unemployment in Europe during the crisis. Labour Economics, 41, 32-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2016.05.022
  17. Boeri, T., & Van Ours, J. (2021). The economics of imperfect labor markets (3rd ed.). Princeton University Press.
  18. Bonoli, G. (2010). The political economy of active labor-market policy. Politics & Society, 38(4), 435-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329210381235
  19. Boulhol, H. (2009). Do capital market and trade liberalization trigger labor market deregulation? Journal of International Economics, 77(2), 223-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.12.001
  20. Bridgen, P., & Meyer, T. (2009). The politics of occupational pension reform in Britain and the Netherlands: The power of market discipline in liberal and corporatist regimes. West European Politics, 32(3), 586-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380902779105
  21. Brinkman, J., Coen-Pirani, D., & Sieg, H. (2018). The political economy of municipal pension funding. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 10(3), 215-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20160400
  22. Casamatta, G., Cremer, H., & Pestieau, P. (2005). Voting on pensions with endogenous retirement age. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(1), 7-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-6392-2
  23. Ciani, E., Delavande, A., Etheridge, B., & Francesconi, M. (2023). Policy uncertainty and information flows: Evidence from pension reform expectations. The Economic Journal, 133(649), 98-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac050
  24. Cioffi, J. W., & Dubin, K. A. (2016). Commandeering crisis: Partisan labor repression in Spain under the guise of economic reform. Politics & Society, 44(3), 423-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329216656840
  25. Clarivate. (2024). Web of Science: Social Sciences Citation Index. Retrieved on 26 March 2024, from https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/webofscience-ssci/
  26. Clegg, D., Durazzi, N., Heins, E., & Robertson, E. (2023). Policy, power and pandemic: varieties of job and income protection responses to Covid-19 in Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(11), 3515-3538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2242907
  27. Cox, J. C., & Oaxaca, R. L. (1982). The political economy of minimum wage legislation. Economic Inquiry, 20(4), 533-555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1982.tb00365.x
  28. Cremer, H., & Pestieau, P. (2000). Reforming our pension system: Is it a demographic, financial or political problem? European Economic Review, 44(4), 974-983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(99)00054-9
  29. Cronin, M. A., & George, E. (2020). The why and how of the integrative review. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 168-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120935507
  30. Dahlström, C., Lindvall, J., & Rothstein, B. (2013). Corruption, bureaucratic failure and social policy priorities. Political Studies, 61(3), 523-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00998.x
  31. Dargent Bocanegra, E. (2022). The limits of neoliberal policy feedback: Private pension fund reforms in Peru (2014-2021). Journal of Politics in Latin America, 14(2), 190-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X221107147
  32. Davidsson, J. B., & Marx, P. (2013). Losing the issue, losing the vote: Issue competition and the reform of unemployment insurance in Germany and Sweden. Political Studies, 61(3), 505-522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00997.x
  33. De la Porte, C., Dagnis Jensen, M., & Kvist, J. (2023). Going Nordic - Can the Nordic model tackle grand challenges and be a beacon to follow? Regulation & Governance, 17(3), 595-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12494
  34. Dixon, A. D., & Sorsa, V.-P. (2009). Institutional change and the financialisation of pensions in Europe. Competition & Change, 13(4), 347-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/102452909X12506915718111
  35. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. J. (2002). The determination of unemployment benefits. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(2), 404-434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/338690
  36. DiSalvo, D., & Kucik, J. (2018). Unions, parties, and the politics of state government legacy cost. Policy Studies Journal, 46(3), 573-597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12232
  37. Dooley, N. (2023). The politics of structural reform in Ireland: Dominant growth coalitions, domestic business elites, and internal devaluation. Competition & Change, 10245294231194694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294231194694
  38. Duval, R., & Furceri, D. (2018). The effects of labor and product market reforms: The role of macroeconomic conditions and policies. IMF Economic Review, 66(1), 31-69. Ebbinghaus, B. (2019). Multipillarisation remodelled: The role of interest organizations in British and German pension reforms. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(4), 521-539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1574875
  39. Elmelund-Præstekær, C., & Emmenegger, P. (2013). Strategic re-framing as a vote winner: Why vote-seeking governments pursue unpopular reforms. Scandinavian Political Studies, 36(1), 23-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00295.x
  40. Etchemendy, S. (2001). Constructing reform coalitions: The politics of compensations in Argentina's economic liberalization. Latin American Politics and Society, 43(3), 1-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2001.tb00177.x
  41. Fleckenstein, T., Saunders, A. M., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2011). The dual transformation of social protection and human capital: Comparing Britain and Germany. Comparative Political Studies, 44(12), 1622-1650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011407473
  42. Fondazione Rodolfo Debenedetti. (2010). fRDB-IZA Social Reforms Database. Retrieved on 11 September 2023, from https://www.frdb.org/en/dati/frdb-iza-social-reforms-database/
  43. Ford, M., Gillan, M., & Ward, K. (2021). Authoritarian innovations in labor governance: The case of Cambodia. Governance, 34(4), 1255-1271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12559
  44. Gabriel, O. W., & Trüdinger, E.-M. (2011). Embellishing welfare state reforms? Political trust and the support for welfare state reforms in Germany. German Politics, 20(2), 273-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2011.582098
  45. Gabszewicz, J. J., & van Ypersele, T. (1996). Social protection and political competition. Journal of Public Economics, 61(2), 193-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(95)01542-6
  46. Gaston, N., & Rajaguru, G. (2008). The rise (and fall) of labour market programmes: Domestic vs. global factors. Oxford Economic Papers, 60(4), 619-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpn002
  47. Gilardi, F. (2010). Who learns from what in policy diffusion processes? American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 650-666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00452.x
  48. Golosov, M., & Iovino, L. (2021). Social insurance, information revelation, and lack of commitment. Journal of Political Economy, 129(9), 2629-2665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/715022
  49. Grodzicki, M. J., & Możdżeń, M. (2021). Central and Eastern European economies in a Goldilocks age: A model of labor market institutional choice. Economic Modelling, 104, 105626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105626
  50. Hassler, J., Rodríguez Mora, J. V, Storesletten, K., & Zilibotti, F. (2005). A positive theory of geographic mobility and social insurance. International Economic Review, 46(1), 263-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-6598.2005.00318.x
  51. Hieda, T. (2021). Linking electoral realignment to welfare politics: An assessment of partisan effects on active labour market policy in post-industrial democracies. Comparative European Politics, 19(5), 555-575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-021-00246-5
  52. Holland, A. C., & Schneider, B. R. (2017). Easy and hard redistribution: The political economy of welfare states in Latin America. Perspectives on Politics, 15(4), 988-1006. Hopia, H., Latvala, E., & Liimatainen, L. (2016). Reviewing the methodology of an integrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 30(4), 662-669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12327
  53. King, D. S., & Rothstein, B. (1993). Institutional choices and labor market policy: A British-Swedish comparison. Comparative Political Studies, 26(2), 147-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414093026002001
  54. Lacomba, J. A., & Lagos, F. M. (2007). Political election on legal retirement age. Social Choice and Welfare, 29(1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0199-7
  55. Larsen, C. A., & Andersen, J. G. (2009). How new economic ideas changed the Danish welfare state: The case of neoliberal ideas and highly organized social democratic interests. Governance, 22(2), 239-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01434.x
  56. Lazear, E. P. (1979). Why is there mandatory retirement? Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1261-1284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260835
  57. Lehmann, H., & Muravyev, A. (2012). Labour market institutions and labour market performance: What can we learn from transition countries? Economics of Transition, 20(2), 235-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2012.00435.x
  58. Lipsmeyer, C. S., & Zhu, L. (2011). Immigration, globalization, and unemployment benefits in developed EU states. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 647-664. Mabbett, D. (2016). The minimum wage in Germany: What brought the state in? Journal of European Public Policy, 23(8), 1240-1258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00509.x
  59. Marx, P. (2015). The political behaviour of temporary workers. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137394873
  60. Marx, P., & Starke, P. (2017). Dualization as destiny? The political economy of the German minimum wage reform. Politics & Society, 45(4), 559-584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329217726793
  61. Meinke, S. R. (2005). Long-term change and stability in house voting decisions: The case of the minimum wage. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(1), 103-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3162/036298005X201473
  62. Meyer, B. (2016). Learning to love the government: Trade unions and late adoption of the minimum wage. World Politics, 68(3), 538-575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887116000058
  63. Milojević, S. (2020). Practical method to reclassify Web of Science articles into unique subject categories and broad disciplines. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 183-206. Myles, J., & Quadagno, J. (2002). Political theories of the welfare state. Social Service Review, 76(1), 34-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00014
  64. Nickell, S., & Layard, R. (1999). Labor market institutions and economic performance. In O. C. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (3C ed., pp. 3029-3084). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(99)30037-7
  65. Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups (revised ed.). Harvard University Press.
  66. OECD. (2020). Employment outlook.
  67. OECD. (2021). Employment outlook.
  68. Palley, T., Caldentey, E. P., & Vernengo, M. (2023). Varieties of capitalism: Second-generation perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035312757
  69. Picot, G. (2009). Party competition and reforms of unemployment benefits in Germany: How a small change in electoral demand can make a big difference. German Politics, 18(2), 155-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000902874257
  70. Pilc, M. (2015). Determinants of the labour market institutions in post-socialist economies. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 48(2-3), 97-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2015.06.008
  71. Pilc, M. (2017). Cultural, political and economic roots of the labor market institutional framework in the OECD and post-socialist countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(4), 713-731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i4.37
  72. Pinggera, M. (2023). Place and policy preferences - Spatial divides in attitudes towards social policies in Germany. Swiss Political Science Review, 29(1), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12546
  73. Pontusson, J., & Weisstanner, D. (2018). Macroeconomic conditions, inequality shocks and the politics of redistribution, 1990-2013. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 31-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310280
  74. Potrafke, N. (2010). Labor market deregulation and globalization: empirical evidence from OECD countries. Review of World Economics, 146(3), 545-571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-010-0056-8
  75. Profeta, P. (2002). Retirement and social security in a probabilistic voting model. International Tax and Public Finance, 9(4), 331-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016539016693
  76. Pula, B. (2020). Disembedded politics: Neoliberal reform and labour market institutions in Central and Eastern Europe. Government and Opposition, 55(4), 557-577. Rasmussen, M. B., & Pontusson, J. (2018). Working-class strength by institutional design? Unionization, partisan politics, and unemployment insurance systems, 1870 to 2010. Comparative Political Studies, 51(6), 793-828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017710269
  77. Rehm, P. (2011). Social policy by popular demand. World Politics, 63(2), 271-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887111000037
  78. Rueda, D. (2006). Social democracy and active labour-market policies: Insiders, outsiders and the politics of employment promotion. British Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 385-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123406000214
  79. Rueda, D. (2008). Social democracy inside out: Partisanship and labor market policy in industrialized democracies. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216352.001.0001
  80. Saint-Paul, G. (1998). A framework for analyzing the political support for active labor market policy. Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), 151-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00069-8
  81. Saint-Paul, G. (2000). The political economy of labour market institutions. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198293321.001.0001
  82. Schmillen, A., Stops, M., & Wang, D. (2023). The determinants of China's minimum wage rates. China & World Economy, 31(3), 59-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12489
  83. Scorsone, E., & Klammer, S. (2021). An institutional perspective on unemployment insurance programs: Historical debates and future policy reforms in the coronavirus recession. Journal of Economic Issues, 55(2), 509-515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2021.1913377
  84. Seltzer, A. J. (1995). The political economy of the fair labor standards act of 1938. Journal of Political Economy, 103(6), 1302-1342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/601456
  85. Silberman, J. I., & Durden, G. C. (1976). Determining legislative preferences on the minimum wage: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 84(2), 317-329. Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113-5142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
  86. Sobel, R. S. (1999). Theory and evidence on the political economy of the minimum wage. Journal of Political Economy, 107(4), 761-785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/250078
  87. Swank, D., & Martin, C. J. (2001). Employers and the welfare state: The political economic organization of firms and social policy in contemporary capitalist democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(8), 889-923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034008003
  88. Tepe, M., & Vanhuysse, P. (2012). Parties, unions and activation strategies: The context-dependent politics of active labour market policy spending. Political Studies, 61(3), 480-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00996.x
  89. Thomas, J., Harden, A., & Newman, M. (2012). Synthesis: Combining results systematically and appropriately. In D. Gough, S. Oliver & J. Thomas (Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews (pp. 179-226). Sage.
  90. Turrini, A., Koltay, G., Pierini, F., Goffard, C., & Kiss, A. (2015). A decade of labour market reforms in the EU: Insights from the LABREF database. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 4(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40173-015-0038-5
  91. Vindigni, A., Scotti, S., & Tealdi, C. (2015). Uncertainty and the politics of employment protection. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(1), 209-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/678306
  92. Vlandas, T. (2013). The politics of temporary work deregulation in Europe: Solving the French puzzle. Politics & Society, 41(3), 425-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213493754
  93. Voigt, L. (2019). Get the party started: The social policy of the grand coalition 2013-2017. German Politics, 28(3), 426-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2019.1585810
  94. Walker, A., & Foster, L. (2006). Caught between virtue and ideological necessity: A century of pension policies in the UK. Review of Political Economy, 18(3), 427-448. Whitaker, E. A., Herian, M. N., Larimer, C. W., & Lang, M. (2012). The determinants of policy introduction and bill adoption: Examining minimum wage increases in the American States, 1997-2006. Policy Studies Journal, 40(4), 626-649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00467.x
  95. Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
  96. Wiedemann, A. (2022). How credit markets substitute for welfare states and influence social policy preferences: Evidence from US States. British Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 829-849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000708
  97. Wiese, R., Jalles, J. T., & de Haan, J. (2024). Structural reforms and income distribution: New evidence for OECD countries. Oxford Economic Papers, 76(4), 1017-1088. Wright, R. (1986). The redistributive roles of unemployment insurance and the dynamics of voting. Journal of Public Economics, 31(3), 377-399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpae002
  98. Zohlnhöfer, R., & Voigt, L. (2021). The partisan politics of employment protection legislation: Social democrats, Christian democrats, and the conditioning effect of unemployment. European Political Science Review, 13(3), 331-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773921000114
Cytowane przez
Pokaż
ISSN
0035-9629
Język
eng
URI / DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2024.86.4.11
Udostępnij na Facebooku Udostępnij na Twitterze Udostępnij na Google+ Udostępnij na Pinterest Udostępnij na LinkedIn Wyślij znajomemu